Constructing Illegitimacy? Cartels and Cartel Agreements in Finnish Business Media from Critical Discursive Perspective
- 350 Downloads
During the last decade, any questionable or illegal behaviour on the part of businesses has received considerable attention in the media. Using a critical discursive perspective, we here investigate how the media constructs one type of questionable business as illegitimate. Our data draw upon articles dealing with cartels and cartel agreements in Finnish business media covering the five year period 2002–2007. Our contributions are following: We add to the current literature on CSR and national businesses, suggesting that regardless of globalization socio-cultural history plays an important role in constructing the illegitimacy of business practices. We therefore emphasize the importance of media as an arena where social actors construct the social contract between business and society. We further contribute to studies on questionable business by reconstructing a discursive framework used to construct cartels and cartel agreements.
Keywordsbusiness media cartels critical discourse analysis Finland questionable business social legitimacy whistleblowing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multi-level Theory of Social Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.Google Scholar
- Child, J. (2002). The International Crisis of Confidence in Organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 145–147.Google Scholar
- Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2004 Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Deetz, S. 1992, Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonialization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life (State university of New York press, Albany NY).Google Scholar
- Donaldson, T. 1982, Corporations and Morality (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
- Elkington, J. 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Oxford, Capstone).Google Scholar
- Eurobarometer: 2003, Trust in Institutions. 59.1. ZA Study Number 3904. January/February 2003.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. 1995, Media Discourse (London: Edward Arnold).Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. 2003, Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fear, J.: 2006, Cartels and Competition: Neither Market Nor Hierarchies. HBS Working Paper Series 07-011.Google Scholar
- Fellman, S. and J. Itkonen: 2008, Domestic Models, International Influences and Outside Pressures – Cartel Legislation in Finland, 1958–1988. Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C. 1996, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).Google Scholar
- Gitlin, T. 1980, The Whole World is Watching (Berkeley, University of California Press).Google Scholar
- Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schmidpeter, R. (Eds.). 2005, Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Berlin, Springer.Google Scholar
- Harrington, J.E. (2008). Optimal Corporate Leniency Programs. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 56(2), 215–246.Google Scholar
- Helkama, K., & Seppälä, T. 2006, ‹Arvojen muutos Suomessa 1980–2000’, in R. Heiskala and E. Raekallio (eds.), Uusi jako: kuinka Suomesta tuli kilpailukyky-yhteiskunta (pp. 131–155) (Helsinki, Gaudeamus).Google Scholar
- International competition network: 2006, Drafting and Implementing an Effective Leniency Program. Anti-cartel Enforcement Manual.Google Scholar
- Iyengar, S. 1991, Is Anyone Responsible? How television Frames Political issues (Chigago, University of Chigago Press).Google Scholar
- Levinson, M. 2006, The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger (Princeton: EH.Net Economic History Services).Google Scholar
- Mathews, M.R. 1993, Socially Responsible Accounting (London, Chapman and Hall).Google Scholar
- Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.Google Scholar
- Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‹Implicit’ and ‹Explicit’ CSR - A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
- OECD Reviews: 2003, Regulatory Reform Finland: A New Consensus for Change. ISBN 9264102671, i-133 (134).Google Scholar
- Ola, K: 2002, ‹An Introduction to Cartels’, in Finnish Competition Authority Yearbook, pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
- Pollock, T. and V. Rindova: 2003, ‹Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings’, Academy of Management Journal 46(5), 631–642.Google Scholar
- Reisigl, M. and R. Wodak: 2001, Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism (London and New York, Routledge).Google Scholar
- Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‹Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.Google Scholar
- Sustainable society index, 2008, http://www.sustainablesocietyindex.com/pressrelease_ssi2008.pdf.
- Transparency international: 2006–2008, ‹Global Corruption Reports’, http://www.transparency.org/publications/gcr. Checked 28 Feb 2009.
- Vaara, E. and J. Tienari: 2008, ‹A Discursive Perspective on Legitimation Strategies in Multinational Corporations’, Academy of Management Review 33(4), 985-993.Google Scholar
- Van Dijk T. A.: 1998, Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach (London, Sage).Google Scholar
- Wodak, R.: 2001, ‹The Discourse-historical Approach’, in R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94) (London, Sage).Google Scholar
- Wodak, R. and M. Meyer (Eds.): 2001, Methods of critical discourse analysis, (London, Sage).Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum reports: 2005–2009, http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness%20Report/PastReports/index.htm. Checked 28 Feb 2009.