Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 341–359 | Cite as

Relationships among Perceived Organizational Core Values, Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Performance Outcomes: An Empirical Study of Information Technology Professionals

  • K. Gregory Jin
  • Ronald G. Drozdenko


This study is an extension of our recent ethics research in direct marketing (2003) and information technology (2007). In this study, we investigated the relationships among core organizational values, organizational ethics, corporate social responsibility, and organizational performance outcome. Our analysis of online survey responses from a sample of IT professionals in the United States indicated that managers from organizations with organic core values reported a higher level of social responsibility relative to managers in organizations with mechanistic values; that managers in both mechanistic and organic organizations which were perceived as more socially responsible were also perceived as more ethical; and that perceived ethical attitudes and social responsibility were significantly associated with organizational performance outcome measures. Our article discusses research premises, conceptual framework, hypotheses, research methodology, data analysis, recommendations for further research, and conclusions.

Key words

organic and mechanistic organizational core values organizational ethics Corporate Social Responsibility organizational performance information technology professionals 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61-89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agle, B. R, Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 507-525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argandona, A. (2003). Fostering values in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 15-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A Critical Perspective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, 235-246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking, Academy of Management Review , 33(1), 122-136.Google Scholar
  7. Bennis, W. (1977). Bureaucracy and social change: An anatomy of a training failure. In Mirvis, P. H. and Berg, D. N. Failures in Organization Development and change: Cases and essays for learning , New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  8. Beurden, P. V. & Gossling, T. (2008) The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H. M. (1981) Managerial Ideologies and the Use of Discipline. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 2-5, (San Diego, California).Google Scholar
  10. Bhallacharya, C. B., Smith, N. C., & Vogel, D. (2004). Integrating Social Responsibility and Marketing Strategy. California Management Review, 47(1), 1-8.Google Scholar
  11. Birge, E. M. K. (1999). How to measure IT Performance. Beyond Computing, 8 (January-February), 67-71.Google Scholar
  12. Bone, P. F. & Coley, R. J. (1998). Moral reflections in marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 18(2), 104-115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brunsson, N.. (1982). The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality: Decisions, Ideologies and Organizational Actions. Journal of Management Studies, 19, 1, 29-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Social Science Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  15. Business Week, ‹We Have Reinvented Ourselves Many Times’, Issue 3824 (3/17/2003), 88, 2/3p, 1cGoogle Scholar
  16. Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Cochran, P. L. & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal (pre-1986), 27(1), 42-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drozdenko, R. & Jin, K. G. (2008). The Effects of Ethics Code Enforcement and Organizational Value Systems on Employee Ethics: A Study of Two Professional Groups. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 5 (2), 11-19.Google Scholar
  19. Ferratt, O. C., & Short, L. (1986). Are Information Systems People Different: An Investigation of Motivational Differences. MIS Quarterly , 10(4), 377-388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrell, O. C. & Skinner, S. J. (1988). Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(February), 103-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Finegan, J. E. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 149-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forcht, K. A. (1987). Survey of College Students Concerning Computer Ethics: Practitioner’s Views. James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA: Survey Instrument .Google Scholar
  23. Ginzberg, M. J. (1981). Key Recurrent Issues in the IS Implementation Process. MIS Quarterly, 5(2), 47-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, R.: 1988, Diagnosing Organizational Ideology, Study Instrument (Development Research Associates Wiltshire, England)Google Scholar
  25. Heinze, D., Sibary, S. & Sikula, A. (1999). Relations among corporate social responsibility, financial soundness, and investment value in 22 manufacturing industry groups. Ethics & Behavior, 9(4), 331-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hemp, P. and T. A. Stewart: 2004, ‹Leading Change When Business is Good: An Interview with Samuel J. Palmisano (IBM CEO)’, Harvard Business Review (December), 1–11Google Scholar
  27. Howard, R.: 1990, ‹Values Make the Company’, Harvard Business Review (September–October), 133–144Google Scholar
  28. Hummel, R. P. (1982). The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hummel, R. P. (2008). The Bureaucratic Experience: the Post Modern Challenge. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  30. Hunt, S. D. & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Marketing Research, 22 (February), 74-80.Google Scholar
  31. IBMers Value Accessed 4 May 2009
  32. Ives, B. & Olson, M. H. (1984). User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research. Management Science, 30(5), 586-603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jin, K. G. (1991). On a Positive MIS Ideology. In J.M. Carey, (ed.), Human Factors in Information Systems: An Organizational Perspective (195-216). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  34. Jin, K. G. (1997). A Conceptual Framework and Research Strategy: Considerations in the Study of MIS Professional Ideology. in: J.M. Carey (ed.). Human Factors in Information Systems: Relationship Between User Interface Design and Human Performance. Chapter 11 (137-156). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  35. Jin, K. G. (2000). Power-Based Arbitrary Decisional Actions In the Resolution of MIS Project Issues: A Project Manager’s Action Research Perspective. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 13(3), 345-390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jin, K. G. & Drozdenko, R. (2003). Managers’ organizational values and ethical attitudes in the direct marketing industry. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 22(4), 43-66.Google Scholar
  37. Jin, K. G. & Drozdenko, R. (2005). Values, Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Organizational Outcomes,” the 12th Annual International Promoting Business Ethics Conference Proceedings , St. John’s University, New York City Campus.Google Scholar
  38. Jin, K. G., Drozdenko, R. & Bassett, R. (2007). Information technology professionals’ perceived organizational values and managerial ethics: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 149-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jin, K. G. and R. Drozdenko: 2008, The Policy Implications of Our Empirical Research on Values, Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: A Study of Information Professionals. International Technology, Education and Development Conference Proceedings, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  40. Kaiser, K. M. & Bostrom, R. P. (1982). Personality Characteristics of IS Project Teams: An Empirical Study and Action Research Design. MIS Quarterly, 6(4), 43-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. F. (1992). The balanced scoreboard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70 (January-February), 71-79.Google Scholar
  42. Lucas, H. C. (1981). Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  43. Lucas, H. C. (1999). Information Technology and the Productivity Paradox: Assessing the Value of Investing in IT. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Marin, L., Ruiz, S., & Rubio, A. (2009). The Role of Identity Salience in the Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. 84, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Markus, M. L.: 1981, Implementation Politics: Top Management and User Involvement. Information and Management, 1Google Scholar
  46. Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, Politics and IS Implementation. Communication of the ACM, 26(6), 430-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, E. W., Brown, C. V., DeHays, D. W., Hoffer, J. A., & Perkins, W. C. (2005). Managing Information Technology. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  49. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakamura, K.: October 2003, Accessed 20 Jan 2006
  51. Neff, T. J. & Citrin, J. M. (1999). Lessons from the TOP: Search for America’s Best Business Leaders. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  52. Panasonic, Code of Conduct. Accessed 20 Jan 2006
  53. Paradice, D.B. (1990). Ethical Attitudes of Entry-Level MIS Personnel. Information and Management, 18, 143-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pascale, R. T., & Athos, A. G. (1981). The Art of Japanese Management: Applications for American Executives. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  55. Posner, B. Z. & Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Values and the American Manager: An Update. California Management Review, 26(3), 202-216.Google Scholar
  56. Posner, B. Z. & Schmidt, W. H. (1992). Values and the American Manager: An Update Updated. California Management Review, 35(1), 80-94.Google Scholar
  57. Ravlin, E.C. & Meglino, B.M. (1987). Effect of Values on Perception and Decision Making: A Study of Alternative Work Values Measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4),666-673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shneiderman, B.: 1990, Human Values and the Future of Technology: Declaration of Empowerment. Keynote Address for ACM SIGCAS ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  59. Singhapakdi, A., Kraft, K. L., Vitell, S., & Rallapalli, K. C. (1995). The perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility on organizational effectiveness: A survey of marketers. Academy of Marketing Journal, 23 (1), 49-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sjoberg, G., Vaughan, T. R., & Williams, N. (1984). Bureaucracy as a Moral Issue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(4), 441-453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, W. J., Wokutch, R. E., Harrington, K. V, & Dennis, B. S. (2004). Organizational Attractiveness and Corporate Social Orientation: Do Our Values Influence Our Preference for Affirmative Action and Managing Diversity? Business & Society, 43(1), 69-96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sproull, L.S. (1981). Beliefs in Organizations. In P.C. Nystrom and W.H. Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design: Remodeling Organizations and Their Environments, 203-204. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stephenson, A.K.(2009). The Pursuit of CSR and Business Ethics Policies: Is it a Source of Competitive Advantage for Organizations? The Journal of American Academy of Business, 14(2), 251-262.Google Scholar
  64. Swanson, E. B. (1988). Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
  65. Tait, P., & Vassey, I. (1988). The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach. MIS Quarterly, 12(1) (March), 91-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verschoor, C. C. (1999). Corporate Performance Is Closely Linked To A Strong Ethical Commitment. Business and Society Review, 104(4), 407-415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verschoor, C. C. (2005). Ethical Culture: Most Important Barrier to Ethical Misconduct. Strategic Finance, 87 (6), 19-20.Google Scholar
  68. Vitell, S. J. & Davis, D. L. (1990). Ethical Beliefs of MIS Professionals: The Frequency and Opportunity for Unethical Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 63-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vitell, S. J. & Festervand, T. A. (1987). Business ethics: Conflicts, practices, and beliefs of industry executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 111-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vitell, S. J. & Paolillo, J. G. P. (2004). Cultural study of the antecedents of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2/3), 185- 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vitell, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Thomas, J. L. (2003). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 63-86.Google Scholar
  72. Wang, Y. (2009). Examination on Philosophy-Based Management of Contemporary Japanese Corporations: Philosophy, Value Orientation and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 65-78.Google Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  74. Weill, P. (1990). Do Computers Pay Off? Washington, D.C.: ICIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zand, D. E. (1981). Information, Organization, and Power. New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ancell School of BusinessWestern Connecticut State UniversityDanburyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations