Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 485–500 | Cite as

The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners



This study explores the relationship between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and public relations practitioners’ perceptions of corporate social respon- sibility (CSR) in South Korea. The survey on Korean public relations practitioners revealed that, although Hofstede’s dimensions significantly affect public relations practitioners’ perceptions of CSR, social traditionalism values had more explanatory power than cultural dimensions in explaining CSR attitudes. The results suggest that practitioners’ fundamental ideas about the corporation’s role in society seem to be more important than their cultural values to understand public relations practitioners’ CSR attitudes in Korea.

Key words

corporate social responsibility public relations Hofstede’s cultural dimensions social traditionalism values South Korea 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berkowitza, D., & Lee, J. (2004). Media Relations in Korea: Cheong Between Journalist and Public Relations Practitioner. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 431–437. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blodgett, J.G., Lu, L.-C., Rose, G.M., & Vitell, S.J. (2001). Ethical Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interests: A Cross-cultural Comparison. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 190–202. doi: 10.1177/03079459994551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boardman, C.M., & Kato, H.K. (2003). The Confucian Roots of Business Kyosei. Journal of Business Ethics, 48(4), 317–333. doi: 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000005799.31770.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boynton, L.A. (2002). Professionalism and Social Responsibility: Foundations of Public Relations Ethics. Communication Yearbook, 26, 230–265. doi: 10.1207/s15567419cy2601_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of Ambiguity as a Personality Variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1962.tb02303.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christie, P. M., I. G. Kwon, P. A. Stoeberl and R. Baumhart: 2003, ‹A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Ethical Attitudes of Business Managers. India, Korea and the United States’, Journal of Business Ethics 46(3), 263–287. doi: 10.1023/A:1025501426590 Google Scholar
  7. Clark, C.E. (2000). Differences between Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: An Analysis. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 363–380. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00053-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Culture and Religion Vital to Middle East CSR Model: 2007, Business & the Environment with ISO 14000 Updates 18(1), 6–7Google Scholar
  9. Cutlip, S.M., Center, A.H., & Broom, G.M., 1985 Effective Public Relations, 6th edition. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  10. Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate Citizenship: A Stakeholder Approach for Defining Corporate Social Performance and Identifying Measures for Assessing It. Business & Society 39(2), 210. doi: 10.1177/000765030003900205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esrock, S.L., & Leichty, G.B. (1998). Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-presentation or Agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80142-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frederick, W.C. 2006, Corporation, Be Good!: The Story of Corporate Social Responsibility (Dog Ear Publishing, Indianapolis, IN)Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, R.E. 1984, Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Pitman, Boston, MA)Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, M.: 1970, ‹The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, September 13Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. 1995, Trust (The Free Press, New York, NY)Google Scholar
  16. Gordon, L.V. 1976, Survey of Interpersonal Values-revised Manual (Science R esearch Associates, Chicago)Google Scholar
  17. Grunig, J.E., & Hunt, T. 1984, Managing Public Relations (Rinehart and Winston, New York)Google Scholar
  18. Haruta, A., & Hallahan, K. (2003). Cultural Issues in Airline Crisis Communications. Asian Journal of Communication, 13(2), 122–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstede, G.: 1984, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Abbreviated edition (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA)Google Scholar
  20. Hofstede, G. 1991, Culture and Organization: Software of the Mind (McGraw Hill, London)Google Scholar
  21. Hofstede, G. 2001, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)Google Scholar
  22. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J., 2005 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edition (McGraw Hill, New York, NY).Google Scholar
  24. Jo, S., & Kim, Y. (2004). Media or Personal Relations? Exploring Media Relations Dimensions in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 292–306Google Scholar
  25. John, O.P., & Benet-Martinez, V., 2000 ‹Measurement: Reliability, Construct, Validation, and Scale Construction’. in Reis and Judd (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY) pp. 339-369Google Scholar
  26. Joyner, B.E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311. doi: 10.1023/A:1021237420663 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Judd, L.R. (1989). Credibility, Public Relations and Social Responsibility. Public Relations Review, 15(2), 34–40. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(89)80052-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Just Good Business: A Special Report on Corporate Social Responsibility (2008, January 19). The Economist Google Scholar
  29. Kim, Y. (2003). Ethical Standards and Ideology among Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 209–223. doi: 10.1023/A:1022281507601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, Y., Cha, H., & Kim, J. (2008). Developing a Crisis Management Index: Applications in South Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 20(3), 328–355. doi: 10.1080/10627260801962962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y., & Hon, L.C. (1998). Craft and Professional Models of Public Relations and Their Relation to Job Satisfaction among Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10(3), 155–175. doi: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1003_01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim, S.-Y., & Reber, B.H. (2008). ‹Public Relations’ Place in Corporate Social Responsibility: Practitioners Define Their Role’. Public Relations Review, 34, 337–342. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. L’Etang, J. 2006. ‹Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations Ethics’, in L’Etang and Pieczka (eds.), Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice (LEA, NJ), pp. 405-421Google Scholar
  34. Maignan, I. (2001). ‹Consumers’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibilities: A Cross-cultural Comparison’. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57–72. doi: 10.1023/A:1006433928640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, J.N., & Nakayama, T.K., 2000 Intercultural Communication in Contexts. (Mayfield, London)Google Scholar
  36. Matten, D. 2006. ‹Why do Companies Engage in Corporate Social Responsibility? Background, Reasons and Basic Concepts’, in Hennigfeld, Pohl and Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex), pp. 3-46Google Scholar
  37. McSweeney, B. (2002). ‹Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and Their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith – A Failure of Analysis’. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118Google Scholar
  38. Merkin, R. 2005, ‹Measuring Culture: The Utility of Verifying Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions’, in Starosta and Chen (eds.), International and Intercultural Annual (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), pp. 257-274Google Scholar
  39. Moon, Y., & Franke, G.R. (2000). ‹Cultural Influences on Agency Practitioners’ Ethical Perceptions: A Comparison of Korea and the U.S.’. Journal of Advertising, 29(1), 51–65Google Scholar
  40. Mudrack, P. (2007). Individual Personality Factors that Affect Normative Beliefs about the Rightness of Corporate Social Responsibility. Business & Society, 46(1), 33–62. doi: 10.1177/0007650306290312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norton, R.W. (1975). Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(6), 607–619. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nunnally, J.C. 1994, Psychometric Theory, 3rd edition (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY)Google Scholar
  43. Pohl, M. 2006. ‹Corporate Culture and Csr – How They Interrelate and Consequences for Successful Implementation’, in Hennigfeld, Pohl and Tolhurst (eds.), The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex), pp. 47-59Google Scholar
  44. Rhee, Y. (2002). Global Public Relations: A Cross-cultural Study of the Excellence Theory in South Korea. Journal of Public Relations Research, 14(3), 159–184. doi: 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1403_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robin, D.P., & Reidenbach, R.E. (1987). Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap between Concept and Application. Journal of Marketing, 51, 44–58. doi: 10.2307/1251143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ryan, M. (1986). ‹Public Relations Practitioners’ Views of Corporate Social Responsibility’. The Journalism Quarterly, 63(4), 740–762Google Scholar
  47. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shin, H. J.: 2006 Analysis of the Perception and Reality of Integrated Communications (IMC) in Corporate Public Relations: A Study of South Korea, unpublished master’s thesis (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL)Google Scholar
  49. Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S.J., & Leelakulthanit, O. (1994). A Cross-cultural Study of Moral Philosophies, Ethical Perceptions and Judgments: A Comparison of American and Thai Marketers. International Marketing Review, 11(6), 65–78. doi: 10.1108/02651339410073015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sriramesh, K., & White, J., 1992 ‹Societal Culture and Public Relations’. in J. E. Grunig (ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. (Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ), pp. 597-614Google Scholar
  51. Su, S. (2006). Cultural Differences in Determining the Ethical Perception and Decision-making of Future Accounting Professionals: A Comparison between Accounting Students from Taiwan and the United States. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(1), 147–158Google Scholar
  52. The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-free Dimensions of Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164. doi: 10.1177/0022002187018002002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323–338. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vasquez, G.M., & Taylor, M. (1999). What Cultural Values Influence American Public Relations Practitioners? Public Relations Review, 25(4), 433–449. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)00030-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vitell, S.J., Nwachukwu, S.L., & Barnes, J.H. (1993). ‹The Effects of Culture on Ethical Decision-making: An Application of Hofstede’s Typology’. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 753–760. doi: 10.1007/BF00881307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vitell, S.J., Paolillo, J.G.P., & Thomas, J.L. (2003). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 63–86Google Scholar
  57. Voich, D. 1995, ‹Comparative Empirical Analysis of Cultural Values and Perceptions of PoliticalEconomy Issues’, (Praeger Press, Westport, CT)Google Scholar
  58. Wicks, A. C.: 1996, ‹Overcoming the Separation Thesis: The Need for a Reconsideration of Business and Society Research’, Business and Society 35(1), 89–118Google Scholar
  59. Williamson, D. (2002). ‹Forward from a Critique of Hofstede’s Model of National Culture’. Human Relations, 55(11), 1373–1395Google Scholar
  60. Wu, M., Taylor, M., & Chen, M. (2001). Exploring Societal and Cultural Influences on Taiwanese Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 27, 317–336. doi: 10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00089-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamaguchi, S., 1994 ‹Collectivism among the Japanese: A Perspective from the Self’. in Kim, Triandis, Kagitcibasi, Choi and Yoon (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications. (Sage Publications, London), pp. 175-188Google Scholar
  62. Yum, J.O. 1987. ‹Korean Philosophy and Communication’, in D. L. Kincaid (ed.), Communications Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives (Academic Press, San Diego, CA), pp. 71-86Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of CommunicationEwha Womans UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.College of Journalism and CommunicationsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations