Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 91, Issue 3, pp 319–327 | Cite as

The Political Dimension: Added Value for Cross-Cultural Analysis. Nozawa and Smits, Two CEOs and Their Public Statements

  • Robert van Es
  • Thomas Pels
Article
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

Work-related cultural differences, which were familiarized by scholars such as Hall and Hofstede, offer important concepts to help us understand various forms of cooperation and communication. However, the predominant focus of cultural analysis on collectivistic harmony prevents us from gaining an understanding of strategy and conflict. In an attempt to grasp how conflicts are handled, a political analysis can provide new insights. This is illustrated by a comparative study of two CEOs who gave public statements concerning management failure: Shouhei Nozawa of Yamaichi and Paul Smits of KPN. Their statements were strikingly different in several ways, but the classical insights of cross-cultural analysis can only partly explain the differences. This is where political analysis comes in, focusing on interest relationships, responsibilities and virtues, tactics and strategy.

Keywords

cultural differences political analysis public statements responsibility makoto spijt CEO Nozawa Yamaichi Smits KPN 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akiyama, M.M. (1984). Are Language-Acquisition Strategies Universal? Developmental Psychology, 20, 219–228. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.20.2.219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amyx, J.A. 2004. Japan’s Financial Crisis: Institutional Rigidity and Reluctant Change Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benedict, R. 1946. Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  4. Buruma, I. 2003. Inventing Japan, 1853-1964. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, R.E. 2001. Encounter with Enlightment: A Study of Japanese Ethics. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. 2006 Power and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Fennema, E. 1996. Hoe Japan werkt. Antwerpen: Atlas.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, E.T. 1976. Beyond Culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Hofstede, G., & Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius Connection: from Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G.J.2005. Cultures and Organization: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Holden, N.J. 2002. Cross-Cultural Management: A Knowledge Management Perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  13. Miyanaga, K. 1991. The Creative Edge: Emerging Individualism in Japan. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organization. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Mumby, D. 2000. “Power and Politics” pp. 585-623 in The New Handbook of Organizational Communication, ed. F. Jablin and L. Putnam. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Pels, T. J.: 2002, Nozawa en Smits. Het nemen van morele verantwoordelijkheid bij Yamaichi en KPN. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson, J.B. 1997. “Scandal and social theory” in Media Scandal. Morality and Desire in the Popular Culture Marketplace, ed. Lull, J. & S. Hinerman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ting-Toomey, S. 1999. Communication Across Cultures. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Berg, van den, H. 1997. De Ritselaars. Beknopte Nederlandse schandaalwijzer. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
  20. Van Es, R. 1996. Negotiating Ethics. On ethics in negotiation and negotiating in ethics. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  21. Van Es, R. 2004. Communicatie en ethiek. Organisaties en hun publieke verantwoordelijkheid. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
  22. Yoshimura, N., & Anderson, P. 1997. Inside the Kaisha: Demystifying Japanese Business Behavior. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations