Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, 91:145 | Cite as

The Moral Floor: A Philosophical Examination of the Connection Between Ethics and Business

  • Brian K. Burton
  • Michael G. Goldsby
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the philosophical basis for the argument that there is a connection between ethical behavior and profitability. Both sides of this argument – that good ethics is good business and that bad ethics is bad business – are explored. The possibility of a moral floor above which ethical behavior is not rewarded is considered, and an economic experiment testing such a proposition is discussed. Johnson & Johnson suffers a potentially devastating blow when some cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules cause several deaths. Johnson & Johnson voluntarily pulls Tylenol off the shelf, to universal acclaim. When Tylenol is returned to the marketplace, its share of the over-the-counter painkiller market becomes greater than it was before the tragedy. Arthur Andersen, the venerable accounting firm, is caught in the web surrounding the downfall of Enron, Inc. As Enron’s various sins are discovered, it is found that Arthur Andersen auditors had signed off on flawed audits and had shredded documents to cover themselves. Andersen is prosecuted for, and convicted of, obstructing justice (although the conviction is later overturned). Today the firm barely exists and has no resemblance to the Big Five accounting giant of 1999. These stories seem to indicate that ethical (or unethical) behavior leads to positive (or negative) financial results. But the philosophical arguments underpinning such statements are seldom subjected to proper analysis. They are perhaps wishful thinking, or perhaps based on examples such as the above without considering other examples that may reinforce a contrary position. This paper will explore the philosophical arguments and empirical evidence regarding these statements and state some research questions for exploration in this area. In particular we will propose the possibility that a moral floor exists above which firms that engage in ethical activities will not reap rewards, but below which firms that engage in unethical activities will be punished by actors in the economic marketplace. We will discuss an economic experiment to determine if such actors indeed form a moral floor.

Keywords

ethical behavior corporate social performance corporate financial performance 

References

  1. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. 2005. Neuroeconomics: Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carroll A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeGeorge, R.T. 1995. Business ethics (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A., and Barnett, M.L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105 (1): 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fombrun, C., and Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frooman, J. 1997. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36: 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fryxell, G., and Wang, J. 1994. The Fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management, 20: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Griffin, J.J., and Mahon, J.F. 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & Society, 36: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, C.E. Jr. 1997. Applying moral theories (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  11. Hillman, A.J., and Keim, G.D. 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22: 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutton, R.B., D’Antonio, L., and Johnsen, T. 1998. Socially responsible investing: Growing issues and new opportunities. Business & Society, 37: 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93: 1449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koys, D.J. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lakoff, G. 1996. Moral politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Margolis, J.D., and Walsh, J.P. 2001. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance. Mahwah, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Mattingly, J. E. 2004. Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies. Business and Society, 43, 1: 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21: 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orlitzky, M. 1998. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  20. Orlitzky, M. 2002. People and profits? The search for a link between a company’s social and financial performance [review]. International journal of organizational analysis, 10: 191–194.Google Scholar
  21. Orlitzsky, M., Schmidt, F.L., and Rynes, S.L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Payne, L.S. 2003. Value shift: Why companies must merge social and financial imperatives to achieve superior performance. New York: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
  23. Petrick, J.A., Scherer, R.F., Brodzinski, J.D., Quinn, J.F., and Ainina, M.F. 1999. Global leadership skills and reputational capital: Intangible resources for sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 13 (1): 58–69.Google Scholar
  24. Preston, L.E., and O’Bannon, D.P. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Business & Society, 36: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roman, R.M., Hayibor, S., and Agle, B.R. 1999. The relationship between social and financial performance: Repainting a portrait. Business & Society, 38: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowley, T.J., and Berman, S. 2000. A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39: 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M., Janney, J.J., and Paul, K. 2001. An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Surroca, J. and J. A. Tribo: 2005. ‹The Corporate Social and Financial Performance Relationship: What’s the Ultimate Determinant’? Academy of Management Proceedings, E1–E6Google Scholar
  29. Waddock, S.A., and Graves, S.B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waddock, S., and Graves, S.B. 2000. Performance characteristics of social and traditional investments. Journal of Investing, 9: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Business and EconomicsWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamU.S.A.
  2. 2.The Entrepreneurship Center, Miller College of BusinessBall State UniversityMuncieU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations