Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 545–556 | Cite as

Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers

  • Heungsik Park
  • John BlenkinsoppEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article explores the relevance of the Theory of Planned Behavior to whistleblowing research, and considers whether its widely tested validity as a model of the link between attitudes, intention, and behavior might make it an appropriate candidate for a general theory to account for whistleblowing. This proposition is developed through an empirical test of the theory’s predictive validity for whistleblowing intentions. Using a sample of 296 Korean police officers, the analysis showed that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control all had significantly positive main effects on internal whistleblowing intentions, but for external whistleblowing intentions only subjective norm was significant. The implications of these findings for applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to whistleblowing research are discussed.

Keywords

whistleblowing theory of planned behavior 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen I. 1987, Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Social Psychology. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 20, 1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen I. 1991, The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford, C. F.: 2001, Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power (Cornell University Press, London)Google Scholar
  4. Beck L., I. Ajzen 1991, Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blenkinsopp J., M. S. Edwards 2008, On Not Blowing the Whistle: Quiescent Silence as an Emotion Episode. In W. J. Zerbe, C. E. J. Hartel, N. M. Ashkanasy (eds), Research on Emotions in Organizations Volume 4: Emotions, Ethics and Decision-Making. Bradford: EmeraldGoogle Scholar
  6. Bobek D. D., R. C. Hatfield 2003, An Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Moral Obligation in Tax Compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15, 13–38. doi: 10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchan H. F. 2005, Ethical Decision Making in the Public Accounting Profession: An Extension of Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 165–181. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-0277-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Callahan E. S., T. M. Dworkin 2000, The State of State Whistleblower Protection. American Business Law Journal, 38(1), 99–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter T. D., J. L. Reimers 2005, Unethical and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 115–129. doi: 10.1007/s10551-004-7370-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang M. K. 1998, Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825–1834. doi: 10.1023/A:1005721401993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dworkin T. M., M. S. Baucus 1998, Internal vs. External Whistleblowers: A Comparison of Whistleblowing Processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(12), 1281–1298. doi: 10.1023/A:1005916210589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dworkin T. M., E. S. Callahan 1991, Internal Whistleblowing: Protecting the Interests of the Employee, the Organization and Society. American Business Law Journal, 29(2), 267–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1991.tb00634.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukukawa K. 2002, Developing a Framework for Ethically Questionable Behavior in Consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 99–119. doi: 10.1023/A:1021354323586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorta A., Forell, S. 1995, Layers of Decision: Linking Social Definitions of Corruption and Willingness to Take Action. Crime, Law & Social Change, 23, 315–343. doi: 10.1007/BF01298447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grant C. 2002, Whistle Blowers: Saints of Secular Culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(4), 391–399. doi: 10.1023/A:1019771212846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gundlach M. J., S. C. Douglas, M. J. Martinko 2003, The Decision to Blow the Whistle: A Social Information Processing Framework. Academy of Management Review, 28, 107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMillan B., M. Conner 2003, Applying an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Illicit Drug Use Among Students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8), 1662–1683. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01968.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mesmer-Magnus J. R., C. Viswesvaran 2005, Whistleblowing in Organizations: An Examination of Correlates of Whistleblowing Intentions, Actions, and Retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 277–297. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1988, Individual and Situational Correlates of Whistleblowing. Personnel Psychology, 41, 267–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02385.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1992, Blowing the Whistle – The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. New York, NY: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, H., J. Blenkinsopp, M. K. Oktem and U. Omurgonulsen: 2008, ‘Cultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the UK’, Journal of Business Ethics doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9603-1
  22. Parker D., A. S. R. Manstead, S. G. Strading, J. T. Reason, J. S. Baxter 1992, Intentions to Commit Driving Violations: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 94–101. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randall D. M., A. M. Gibson 1991, Ethical Decision Making in the Medical Profession: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(2), 111–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00383614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Teo M. M. M., M. Loosemore 2001, A Theory of Waste Behavior in the Construction Industry. Construction Management and Economics, 19(7), 741–751. doi: 10.1080/01446190110067037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tonglet M. 2002, Consumer Misbehavior: An Exploratory Study of Shoplifting. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1(4), 336–354. doi: 10.1002/cb.79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wated G., J. I. Sanchez 2005, The Effects of Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Attributions, and Individualism-Collectivism on Managers’ Responses to Bribery in Organizations: Evidence from a Developing Nation. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 111–127. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-8712-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Political Science & EconomicsChung-Ang UniversityDongjak-guKorea
  2. 2.Teesside Business SchoolUniversity of TeessideMiddlesbroughU.K.

Personalised recommendations