Whistleblowing as Planned Behavior – A Survey of South Korean Police Officers
- 1.1k Downloads
This article explores the relevance of the Theory of Planned Behavior to whistleblowing research, and considers whether its widely tested validity as a model of the link between attitudes, intention, and behavior might make it an appropriate candidate for a general theory to account for whistleblowing. This proposition is developed through an empirical test of the theory’s predictive validity for whistleblowing intentions. Using a sample of 296 Korean police officers, the analysis showed that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control all had significantly positive main effects on internal whistleblowing intentions, but for external whistleblowing intentions only subjective norm was significant. The implications of these findings for applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to whistleblowing research are discussed.
Keywordswhistleblowing theory of planned behavior
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alford, C. F.: 2001, Whistleblowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power (Cornell University Press, London)Google Scholar
- Blenkinsopp J., M. S. Edwards 2008, On Not Blowing the Whistle: Quiescent Silence as an Emotion Episode. In W. J. Zerbe, C. E. J. Hartel, N. M. Ashkanasy (eds), Research on Emotions in Organizations Volume 4: Emotions, Ethics and Decision-Making. Bradford: EmeraldGoogle Scholar
- Miceli M. P., J. P. Near 1992, Blowing the Whistle – The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Employees. New York, NY: Lexington BooksGoogle Scholar
- Park, H., J. Blenkinsopp, M. K. Oktem and U. Omurgonulsen: 2008, ‘Cultural Orientation and Attitudes Toward Different Forms of Whistleblowing: A Comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the UK’, Journal of Business Ethics doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9603-1
- Wated G., J. I. Sanchez 2005, The Effects of Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Attributions, and Individualism-Collectivism on Managers’ Responses to Bribery in Organizations: Evidence from a Developing Nation. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 111–127. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-8712-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar