Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 85, Issue 4, pp 479–499 | Cite as

The Action Logics of Environmental Leadership: A Developmental Perspective

  • Olivier Boiral
  • Mario Cayer
  • Charles M. BaronEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article examines how the action logics associated with the stages of consciousness development of organizational leaders can influence the meaning, which these leaders give to corporate greening and their capacity to consider the specific complexities, values, and demands of environmental issues. The article explores how the seven principal action logics identified by Rooke and Torbert (2005, Harvard Business Review 83(4), 66–76; Opportunist, Diplomat, Expert, Achiever, Individualist, Strategist and Alchemist) can affect environmental leadership. An examination of the strengths and limitations of these action logics reveals the relevance of the so-called post-conventional stages of consciousness to the recognition and effective management of complex environmental issues. Suggestions are also made for promoting organizational contexts conducive to the development of a post-conventional environmental leadership.

Keywords

environmental leadership consciousness development corporate greening social and environmental responsibilities post-conventional stages 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson L., T. Bateman: 2000. Individual Environmental Initiative: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 548–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragón-Correa J. A.: 1998. Strategic Proactivity and the Firm Approach to the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal 41(5), 556–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal P.: 2003. From Issues to Actions: The Importance of Individual Concerns and Organizational Values in Responding to Natural Environmental Issues. Organizational Science 14(5), 510–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bansal P., K. Roth: 2000. Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 717–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, D. and C. Cowan: 1996, Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and Change (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA)Google Scholar
  6. Boiral O.: 2005. The Impact of Operator Involvement in Pollution Reduction: Case Studies in Canadian Chemical Companies. Business Strategy and the Environment 14(6), 339–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boiral O.: 2006. Global Warming: Should Companies Adopt a Proactive Strategy?. Long Range Planning 39(3), 315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boiral O.: 2007. Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: a Rational Myth?. Organization Science 18(1), 127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulding K. E.: 1969. Beyond Economics, Essays on Society, Religion and Ethics. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  10. Bushe G., B. Gibbs: 1990. Predicting Organization Development Consulting Competence from a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Stage of Ego Development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 26 (3), 337–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Branzei O, T. J. Ursacki-Bryant, I. Vertinsky, W. Zhang: 2004. The Formation of Green Strategies in Chinese Firms: Matching Corporate Environmental Responses and Individual Principles. Strategic Management Journal 25, 1075–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catton W. R., R. E. Dunlap: 1980. A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology. American Behavioral Scientist 24(1), 15–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cayer M., C. Baron: 2006. Developing Post-Conventional Leadership Through a Mindfulness Training Program. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie 27(1), 257–271Google Scholar
  14. Christmann P.: 2000. Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christmann P.: 2004. Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy Standardization. Academy of Management Journal 47(5), 747–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christmann P., G. Taylor: 2006. Firm Self-Regulation Through International Certifiable Standards: Determinants of Symbolic Versus Substantive Implementation. Journal of International Business Studies 37(4), 863–878. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cook-Greuter S.: 1990. ‹Maps for Living: Ego-Development Stages from Symbiosis to Conscious Universal Embeddedness’, in: M. L. Commons, C. Armon, L. Kohlberg, F. A. Richards, T. A. Grotzer and J. D. Sinnott (Eds), Adult Development, Models and Methods in the Study of Adolescent and Adult Thought. (Praeger, New York), pp. 79–104.Google Scholar
  18. Cook-Greuter, S.: 1994, ‹Rare Forms of Self-Understanding in Mature Adults’, in M. Miller and S. Cook-Greuter (eds.), Transcendence and Mature Thought in Adulthood (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD), pp. 119–146Google Scholar
  19. Cook-Greuter, S.: 1999, ‹Postautonomous Ego Development: A Study of Its Nature and Measurement’, Unpublished dissertation, Harvard, Boston.Google Scholar
  20. Cook-Greuter, S.: 2000, ‹Mature Ego Development: A Gateway to Ego Transcendence’, Journal of Adult Development 7(4), 227–240Google Scholar
  21. Cook-Greuter. S.: 2004, Making the Case for a Developmental Perspective Industrial and Commercial Training 36(7), 275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cordano M., H. Frieze: 2000. Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 627–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crane A.: 2000. Corporate Greening as Amoralization. Organization Studies 21(4), 673–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dechant K., B. Altman: 1994, Environmental Leadership: From Compliance to Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Executive 8(3), 7–20Google Scholar
  25. Delmas M.: 2001, Stakeholders and Competitive Advantage: The Case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management 10(3), 343–358Google Scholar
  26. Dispensa J. M., R. J. Brulle: 2003. Media’s Social Construction of Environmental Issues: Focus on Global Warming. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23(10), 74–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dunlap R. E., K. D. Van Liere: 1978. The New Environmental Paradigm: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results. Journal of Environmental Education 9, 10–19Google Scholar
  28. Ebreo A., J. Hershey, J. Vining: 1999. Reducing Solid Waste: Linking Recycling to Environmentally Responsible Consumerism. Environment and Behavior 31(1), 107–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Egri C. P., P. J. Frost: 1994. Leadership for Environmental and Social Change. Leadership Quarterly 5(3–4), 195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Egri C., S. Herman: 2000. Leadership in the North American Environmental Sector: Values, Leadership Styles and Contexts of Environmental Leaders and Their Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 571–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fisher D., W. Torbert: 1991. Transforming Managerial Practice: Beyond the Achiever Stage. Research in Organizational Change Development, 5, 143–173Google Scholar
  32. Fernandez E., B. Junquera, M. Ordiz: 2006. Managers’ Profile in Environmental Strategy: A Review of the Literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13(5), 261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Flannery B. L., D. R. May: 2000. Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the U.S. Metal-Finishing Industry. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 642–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Forte A.: 2004. Business Ethics: A Study of the Moral Reasoning of Selected Business Managers and the Influence of Organizational Climate. Journal of Business Ethics 51, 167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fowler S. J., C. Hope: 2007. Incorporating Sustainable Business Practices into Company Strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gonzàlez-Benito J., O. Gonzàlez-Benito: 2006. A Review of Determinant Factors of Environmental Proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment 15(2), 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gladwin T. M., J. J. Kennelly, T. S. Krause: 1995. Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review 20(4), 874–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Guerette R. H.: 1986. Environmental Integrity and Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 5, 409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harris L. C., A. Crane: 2002. The Greening of Organizational Culture: Managers’ Views on the Depth, Degree and Diffusion of Change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 15(3), 214–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hart S.: 1995. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review 20(4), 986–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hawken P., A. Lovins, L. H. Lovins: 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution. Little Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  42. Henriques A., J. Richardson: 2004. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Henriques I., P. Sadorsky: 1999. The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal 42(1), 87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoffman A. J.: 1999. Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(4), 351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howard-Grenville J. A.: 2006. Inside the Black Box: How Organizational Culture and Subcultures Inform Interpretations and Actions on Environmental Issues. Organization and Environment 19(1), 46–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Immordino G.: 2003. Looking for a Guide to Protect the Environment: The Development of the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Economic Surveys 17(5), 629–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kerr I. R.: 2006. Leadership Strategies for Sustainable SME Operations. Business Strategy and the Environment 15, 30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kohlberg L.: 1969. Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization. In: D. Goslin (ed), Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research. Rand McNally, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Loevinger J.: 1976. Ego Development: Conceptions and Theories. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  50. Loevinger J., Wessler, R.: 1970, Measuring Ego Development: Volume I. Construction and Use of a Sentence Completion Test. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  51. Manners J., K. Durkin, A. Nesdale.: 2004. Promoting Advanced Ego Development Among Adults. Journal of Adult Development 11(1), 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marrewijk M. V.: 2003. Concepts and Definitions of CSR and Corporate Sustainability: Between Agency and Communion. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3), 95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marrewijk M. V.: 2004. A Value Based Approach to Organization Types: Towards a Coherent Set of Stakeholder-Oriented Management Tools. Journal of Business Ethics 55(2), 147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marrewijk M. V., M. Were: 2003. Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2/3), 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mccauley C. D., W. H. Drath, C. J. Palus, P. M. G. O’Connor, B. A. Baker: 2006. The Use of Constructive-Developmental Theory to Advance the Understanding of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 17, 634–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meehan Souvaine, E.: 1999, ‹Developmentally Constructive Action: A Case for the Mutually Informing Potential of Action Science and Constructive-Developmental Theory’, Unpublished dissertation, Harvard, BostonGoogle Scholar
  57. Organ D., P. Podsakoff, S. MacKenzie: 2006, Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  58. Painter-Morland, M.: 2006. Redefining Accountability as Relational Responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Parker L. D.: 2005. Social and Environmental Accountability Research: A View from the Commentary Box. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(6), 842–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porter M., C. van der Linde: 1995. Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review 73(5), 120–134Google Scholar
  61. Purser R. E., C. Park, A. Montuori: 1995. Limits to Anthropocentrism: Toward an Ecocentric Organization Paradigm?. Academy of Management Review 20(4), 1053–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rasche A., D. E. Esser: 2006. From Stakeholder Management to Stakeholder Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 65(3), 251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rooke D.: 1997. Organisational Transformation Requires the Presence of Leaders who are Strategists and Magicians. Organisations and People 4(3), 16–23Google Scholar
  64. Rooke D., W. R. Torbert: 1998. Organisational Transformation as a Function of the CEO’s Developmental Stage. Organizational Development Journal 16(1), 11–28Google Scholar
  65. Rooke D., W. Torbert: 2005. Seven Transformations of Leadership. Harvard Business Review 83(4), 66–76Google Scholar
  66. Rugman A. M., A. Verbeke: 1998. Corporate Strategies and Environmental Regulations: An Organizing Framework. Strategic Management Journal 19(4), 363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A., J. Bunge, A. Freeman-Gallant, E. Cohen-Rosenthal: 1996, Employee Participation in Pollution Reduction: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment 5(3), 137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shafer W. E.: 2006. Social Paradigms and Attitudes Toward Environmental Accountability. Journal of Business Ethics 65, 121–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sharma S.: 2000. Managerial Interpretations and Organizational Context as Predictors of Corporate Choice of Environmental Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 43(4), 681–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sharma S., H. Vredenburg: 1998. Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organizational Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 19(8), 729–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shrivastava P.: 1994. Voices on Change. Ecocentric Leadership in the 21st Century. Leadership Quarterly 5(3/4), 223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shrivastava P.: 1995. The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability. Academy of Management Review 20(4), 936–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Springett D.: 2003. Business Conceptions of Sustainable Development: A Perspective from Critical Theory. Business Strategy and the Environment 12(2), 71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Standards Council of Canada: 2004. Environmental Management Systems: Requirements with Guidance for Use. CSA, Mississauga, Ontario. Google Scholar
  75. Stubbs, W. and C. Cocklin: 2006, ‹An Ecological Modernist Interpretation of Sustainability: the Case of Interface Inc.’, Business Strategy and the Environment, in press, published online July 20, 2006Google Scholar
  76. Sweet S., N. Roome, P. Sweet: 2003. Corporate Environmental Management and Sustainable Enterprise: The Influence of Information Processing and Decision Styles. Business Strategy and the Environment 12, 265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Teal E. J., A. B. Carroll: 1999. Moral Reasoning Skills: Are Entrepreneurs Different?. Journal of Business Ethics 19, 229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Torbert W.: 1987. Managing the Corporate Dream: Restructuring for Long-Term Success. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, ILGoogle Scholar
  79. Torbert W.: 1991, The Power of Balance: Transforming Self, Society and Scientific Inquiry. Sage, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  80. Torbert W.: 2004, Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  81. Torbert W., D. Fisher: 1992. Autobiographical Awareness as a Catalyst for Managerial and Organisational Development. Management Education and Development 23(3), 184–198Google Scholar
  82. Winter G.: 1995, Blueprint for Green Management. McGraw-Hill. Berkshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  83. Young J. E.: 2002. A Spectrum of Consciousness for CEOS: A Business Application of Wilber’s Spectrum of Consciousness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 10(1), 30–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Boiral
    • 1
  • Mario Cayer
    • 1
  • Charles M. Baron
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.ManagementLaval UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations