Abstract
International business faces a host of difficult moral conflicts. It is tempting to think that these conflicts can be morally resolved if we gained full knowledge of the situations, were rational enough, and were sufficiently objective. This paper explores the view that there are situations in which people in business must confront the possibility that they must compromise some of their important principles or values in order to protect other ones. One particularly interesting case that captures this kind of situation is that of Google and its operations in China. In this paper, I examine the situation Google faces as part of the larger issue of moral compromise and integrity in business. Though I look at Google, this paper is just as much about the underlying or background views Google faces that are at work in business ethics. In the process, I argue the following: First, the framework Google has used to respond to criticisms of its actions does not successfully or obviously address the important ethical issues it faces. Second, an alternative ethical account can be presented that better addresses these ethical and human rights questions. However, this different framework brings the issue of moral compromise to the fore. This is an approach filled with dangers, particularly since it is widely held that one ought never to compromise one’s moral principles. Nevertheless, I wish to propose that there may be a place for moral compromise in business under certain conditions, which I attempt to specify.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amnesty International 2006 Undermining Freedom of Expression in China. London: Amnesty International UK
Anonymous 2006a The Party, the People and the Power of Cyber-talk. The Economist 379: 27–30
Anonymous: 2006b, ‘Amnesty International Blasts Yahoo, Microsoft, Google for China Dealings’, www.foxnews.com. July 21, 2006
Anonymous: 2006c, ‘Internet Censorship in the People’s Republic of China’, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_China. Downloaded September 22, 2006
Barnett, R.: 2005, ‘How Business Ethics Failed Corporate America’, www.projectmagazine.com/v3i7/ethicsv3i7.html. November 3, 2005
Benditt, T. M.: 1979, ‘Compromising Interests and Principles’, in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics, NOMOS XXI (New York University Press, New York), pp. 26–37
Benjamin M. 1990. Splitting the Difference: Compromise and Integrity in Ethics and Politics. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press
Bridis, T.: 2006, ‘Brin Says Google Compromised Principles’, http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/14755205.htm. Downloaded September 21, 2006
Bowden, T. A.: 1999. ‘Blacklists are not Censorship’, http://www.aynrand.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5242&news_iv_ctrl=1021
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights: n.d., ‘A Guide for Integrating Human Rights into Business Management’, http://www.blihr.org/Pdfs/GIHRBM.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2006
Business and Human Rights Resource Center: 2006, ‘Google Response Regarding Amnesty International Action on Censorship in China’, www.business-humanrights.org. Accessed February 25, 2008
CNN: 2006, ‘Web Firms Criticized over China’, http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/07/20/china.internet.ap/. July 20, 2006
Congressional Executive Commission: 2006, ‘Freedom of Expression, Speech and the Press’, http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAcad/exp/. Accessed May 8, 2008
De George, R. 1991 Green and Everybody’s Doing It. Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1): 95–100
De George R. T. 1993 Competing with Integrity in International Business. New York: Oxford University Press
De George R. T. 1999 Business Ethics. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Delaney, K. J.: 2006, ‘Google to Launch Service in China’, Wall Street Journal, January 25, p. B2
Donaldson T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. New York: Oxford University Press
Donaldson T., T. W. Dunfee 1999. Ties that Bind. Boston: Harvard University Press
Green R. M. 1991. When is “Everyone’s Doing It” a Moral Justification? Business Ethics Quarterly 1(1): 75–93
Halfon M. S. 1989. Integrity: A Philosophical Inquiry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press
Hampshire S. 1983. Morality and Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Human Rights Watch: 2006, ‘Race to the Bottom’, Vol. 18, No. 8(C) (August), http://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/china0806/china0806webwcover.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2008
Internet Society of China: 2002, ‘Public Pledge of Self-Regulation and Professional Ethics for China Internet Industry’, www.isc.org.cn/200020417/ca102762.htm. Accessed August 14, 2006
Joint NGO Letter in Response to Interim Report: 2006, www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/Joint_NGO_Response_to_Interim_Report.pdf. Accessed May 8, 2008
Kavka G. S. 1983. When Two ‘Wrongs’ Make a Right: An Essay on Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 2: 61–66
Khan, I.: 2006, Amnesty International Letter to John Ruggie (April 27, 2006)
Kirby, C.: 2005, ‘Chinese Internet vs. Free Speech. Hard Choices for U.S. Tech Giants’, San Francisco Chronicle, www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/artilce.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/09/18/MNGDUEPNLA1.DTL. Downloaded August 28, 2006
Kirchgaessner, S.: 2006, ‘Yahoo Wants United Front on China Censorship’, www.FT.com (February 13, 2006. http://news.ft.com/cms/s/d14aef8c-9c0d-11da-8baa-0000779e234o,s01=1.html
Kuflik, A.: 1979, ‘Morality and Compromise’, in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds.), Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics, NOMOS XXI (New York University Press, New York), pp. 38–65
Leisinger, K.: 2006, ‘On Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights’, Basel (April)
Ma, Y.: 2006, ‘Google “Congress and Hypocrisy’’, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/02/opinion/main1272920.shtml. Accessed February 25, 2008
Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review March–April, 106–117
Pan, P. P.: 2006, ‘The Click that Broke a Government’s Grip’, Washington Post February 19, p. A01
Parr, M.: 2006, ‘Google’s China Problem and China’s Google Problem’, New York Times Magazine (April 23, 2006), pp. 64–71, 86, 154, 155, 156
Pennock, J. R. and J. W. Chapman (eds.): 1979, Compromise in Ethics, Law and Politics, NOMOS XXI (New York University Press, New York)
Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgment of the Tribunal: 1950, http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/7_1_1950.pdf. Accessed April 13, 2008
Rand A. 1964. The Virtue of Selfishness. New York: The New American Library, Inc
Rasch, M.: 2005, ‘Human Rights and Wrongs Online’, www.securityfocus.com/print/columnists/392
Reporters Without Borders: 2006a, ‘Google Launches Censored Version of Its Search-Engine’, www.rsf.org/print.php3?id_article=16262. Downloaded January 25, 2006
Reporters Without Borders: 2006b, ‘Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Internet’, http://www.rsf.org/fonds-investissement-en.php3. Accessed February 25, 2008
Rudolf, G.: 2003, ;Censorship of the Internet’, www.vho.org/tr/2003/2/Rudolf220-22.html (July 18, 2006)
Santoro M. A. 1998. Engagement with Integrity: What We Should Expect Multinational Firms to do About Human Rights in China. Business & the Contemporary World X(1), 25–54
Schrage, E.: 2002, ‘Why CSR is a Corporate Governance Challenge’, Ethical Performance (October 1, 2002)
Schrage, E.: 2006, ‘Testimony of Google Inc. Before the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific, and the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Human Rights, and International Operations’, http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/02/testimony-internet-in-china.html. Accessed February 15, 2006 (11 pages)
Sher G. 1981. Subsidized Abortion: Moral Rights and Moral Compromise. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10(4): 361–372
Solely L. 2002. Censorship, Inc. New York: Monthly Review Press
Smith, C.: 2006, ‘Internet Should not Become Tool of Repression, Lawmaker Says’, http://usinfo.state.gov/dhr/Archive/2006/Mar/21-178338.html. Accessed February 25, 2008
Thompson, C.: 2006, ‘Google’s China Problem (and China’s Google Problem)’, The New York Times (April 23)
UN Global Compact: n.d., ‘The Ten Principles’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html. Accessed May 8, 2008
UN Global Compact/Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR): 2004, Embedding Human Rights in Business Practice (New York)
Vogel D. 2006. The Market for Virtue. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press
Walzer M. 1973. Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2(2), 160–180
Williams B. 1972. Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York, Harper and Row
Williams B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wu, T.: 2005, ‘The Filtered Future’, http://www.slate.com/id/2122270. Accessed February 25, 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brenkert, G.G. Google, Human Rights, and Moral Compromise. J Bus Ethics 85, 453–478 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9783-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9783-3