Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 82, Issue 1, pp 171–187 | Cite as

A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions

  • Eva Hofmann
  • Erik Hoelzl
  • Erich Kirchler
Article

Abstract

As moral decision making in financial markets incorporates moral considerations into investment decisions, some rational decision theorists argue that moral considerations would introduce inefficiency to investment decisions. However, market demand for socially responsible investment is increasing, suggesting that investment decisions are influenced by both financial and moral considerations. Several models can be applied to explain moral behavior. We test the suitability of (a) multiple attribute utility theory (MAUT), (b) theory of planned behavior, and (c) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. In an experimental setting, 141 participants traded company shares in a computerized asset market. Over 12 periods, companies varied in morality (i.e., treatment of employees) and in profitability (i.e., expected dividends per share). Participants’ bids and asks for shares were recorded. Results indicate that moral considerations influence investment decisions, controlling for profit. Differences between the three models are discussed.

Keywords

ethics decision theory behavioral economics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nicole Fabbro and Silvia Hansbauer for helping with data collection and the ‹Verein zur Foerderung der Wirtschaftspsychologie’ for financial support.

References

  1. Ajzen I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J., Beckmann J. (eds.), Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 11–39Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand P., Cowton C. J. (1993). The Ethical Investor: Exploring Dimensions of Investment Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 14, 377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bamberg S., Rolle D., Weber C. (2003). Does Habitual Car Use not Lead to More Resistance to Whom It May Concern: Change of Travel Mode? Transportation 30, 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron J. (2000). Thinking and Deciding (3rd edition). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg J. E., Daley L. A., Dickhaut J. W., O’Brien J. R. (1986). Controlling Preferences for Lotteries on Units of Experimental Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 281–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bobek D., Hatfield R. (2003). An Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Role of Moral Obligation in Tax Compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15, 13–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borrello, M. G., M. Morricone, A. Pedon and P. Benevene: 2004, Ethical Finance between Saving and Investment. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Economic Psychology/SABE-IAREP Conference, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Bortz J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler (5th ed). Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. (1999). The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital–Labor–Production Framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 7–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlson D. S., Kacmar K. M., Wadsworth L. L. (2002). The Impact of Moral Intensity Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making: Assessing the Relevance of Orientation. Journal of Managerial Issues 14, 15–30Google Scholar
  12. Carswell A. (2002). Crisis of Conscience. Australian CPA 72, 26–27Google Scholar
  13. Chapman G. B., Elstein A. S., Kuzel T. M., Nadler R. B., Sharifi R., Bennett C. L. (1999). A Multi-Attribute Model of Prostate Cancer Patients’ Preferences for Health States. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 8, 171–180Google Scholar
  14. East R. (1993). Investment Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology 14, 337–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flannery B. L., May D. R. (2000). Environmental Ethical Decision Making in the US Metal-Finishing Industry. Academy of Management Journal 43, 642–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Addison Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallup: 2000, One in Nine Investor Households Have “Socially Responsible” Investments (Gallup, Princeton).Google Scholar
  18. Hofmann, E., E. Penz and E. Kirchler: 2004, Ethical Investment: An Explorative Study for the Explanation of Ethical Behaviour on Asset Markets. Paper presented at the 29th Annual Colloquium of the International Association for Economic Psychology/SABE-IAREP Conference, Philadelphia, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16, 366–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasubek, W. and K. M. Aschenbrenner: 1978, Optimierung subjektiver Urteile. Anwendung der multiattributen Nutzentheorie bei medizinischen Therapieentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 25, 594–616. [Optimization of subjective judgments. Application of the MAUT for decisions of medical therapy.]Google Scholar
  21. Kant, I.: 1959, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (translated by L. W. Beck) (Liberal Arts Press, New York), (Original published 1781).Google Scholar
  22. Kim T-Y., Kwak S.-J., Yoo S. H. (1998). Applying Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Decision Making in Environmental Planning: A Case Study of the Electric Utility in Korea. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41, 597–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwak S-J., Yoo S. H., Kim T-Y. (2001). A Constructive Approach to Air-Quality Valuation in Korea. Ecological Economics 38, 327–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis A. (2001). A Focus Group Study of the Motivation to Invest: ‹Ethical/Green’ and ‹Ordinary’ Investors Compared. Journal of Socio-Economics 30, 331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lewis A., Mackenzie C. (2000). Morals, Money, Ethical Investing and Economic Psychology. Human Relations 53, 179–191Google Scholar
  26. Lewis A., Webley P. (1994). Social and Ethical Investing. Beliefs, Preferences and the Willingness to Sacrifice Financial Return. In: Lewis A., Wärneryd K.-E. (eds), Ethics and Economic Affairs. Routhledge, London, pp.171–182Google Scholar
  27. Lewis A., Webley P., Winnett A., Mackenzie C. (1998). Morals and Markets: Some Theoretical and Policy Implications of Ethical Investing. In: Taylor-Goodby P. (ed.), Choice and Public Policy: The Limits of Welfare Markets. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp.164–182Google Scholar
  28. Loe T. W., Ferrell L., Mansfield P. (2000). A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision Making in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 25, 185–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markowitz H. M. (1952a). The Utility of Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 60, 151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markowitz H. M. (1952b). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance 7, 77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May D. R., Pauli K. P. (2002). The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making. Business and Society 41, 84–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michelson G., Wailes N., van der Laan S., Frost G. (2004). Ethical Investment Processes and Outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montalvo-Corral C. (2002). Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Why Do Firms Adopt or Reject New Technologies? Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  34. Raftery A. E. (1996). Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research. In: Marsden P. V. (ed.), Sociological Methodology Vol. 25. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 111–163Google Scholar
  35. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Rest J. (1986). Moral Development. Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Roth A. E., Malouf M. W. K. (1979). Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining. Psychological Review 86, 574–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schifter D. B., Ajzen I. (1985). Intention, Perceived Control and Weight Loss: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 843–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith V. (1962). An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. The Journal of Political Economy LXX, 111–137Google Scholar
  40. Smith V. (1994). Economics in the Laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 113–131Google Scholar
  41. Sparkes R., Cowton C. J. (2004). The Maturing of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review of the Developing Link with Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stata Corporation: 2005, Stata Base Reference Manual, Release 9 Vol. 1 (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
  43. Stewart, M.: 1983, On Least Squares Estimation When the Dependent Variable Is Grouped. Review of Economic Studies 50, 737–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor R. (2000). How New Is Socially Responsible Investment? Business Ethics: A European Review 9, 174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weber J. (1996). Influences upon Managerial Moral Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences. Human Relations 49, 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webley P., Lewis A., Mackenzie C. (2001). Commitment among Ethical Investors: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations