Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Efficacy as an Intrapersonal Predictor for Internal Whistleblowing: A US and Canada Examination

  • Corporate Governance
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examining intrapersonal factors theorized to influence ethics reporting decisions, the relation of self-efficacy as a predictor of propensity for internal whistleblowing is investigated within a US and Canadian multi-regional context. Over 900 professionals from a total of nine regions in Canada and the US participated. Self-efficacy was found to influence participant reported propensity for internal whistleblowing consistently in both the US and Canada. Seasoned participants with greater management and work experience demonstrated higher levels of self-efficacy while gender was also found to be influential to self-efficacy. These individual traits, although related to self-efficacy, did not directly relate to propensities for internal whistleblowing. The findings demonstrate that self-efficacy could represent an important individual trait for examining whistleblowing issues. Internal whistleblowing is becoming an important organizational consideration in many areas of North America, yet there is relatively little research on the topic. Organizations seeking effective internal reporting systems should consider the influence of self-efficacy along with its potential reporting influence. By empirically testing an under-examined component of theory related to internal whistleblowing, this effort contributes to management literature, extending the knowledge beyond a US context, and provides recommendation for managing individual bias with internal reporting systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Adams S. (1963) Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(5):422–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review 84(2):191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1997) Self-Efficacy. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett T. (1992) Will Your Employees Blow the Whistle? HR Magazine 37(7):76–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz N., Hackett G. (1981) The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 28(5):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betz N., Hackett G. (1986) Applications of Self-Efficacy Theory to Understanding Career Choice Behavior. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K. (1989) Structural Equations with Latent Variables. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K., Long J. (1993) Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabeck M. (1984) Ethical Characteristics of Whistleblowers. Journal of Research in Personality 18:21–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin R. (1981) Cross-Cultural Encounters: Face-to-Face Interaction. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin R. (2000) Understanding Culture’s Influence on Behavior, 2nd Ed. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin R., MacNab B., Bechtold D. (2004) Translation. Encyclopaedia of Applied Psychology 3:287–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody R., Coulter J., Mihalek P. (1998) Whistle-Blowing: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Ethical Perceptions of US and Japanese Accounting Students. American Business Review 16(2):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody R., Coulter J., Lin S. (1999) The Effect of National Culture on Whistle-Blowing Perceptions. Teaching Business 3(4):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman M. (2000) The Diversity of Diversity: Canadian – American Differences and their Implications for Clinical Training and APA Accreditation. Canadian Psychology 41(4):230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch T. (1995) Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance Among Students of Business Administration. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 39:211–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko L., Hunt S. (1985) Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Research 13:239–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtemanche G. (1988) The Ethics of Whistle Blowing. The Internal Auditor 45(1):36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • England P. (1979) Women and Occupational Prestige: A Case of Vacuous Sex Equality. Signs 5(2):252–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez M., Early C. (1993) Culture, Self-Efficacy and Work. Oxford, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing D. (1983) Do It My Way or You’re Fired! Employee Rights and the Changing Role of Management Prerogatives. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O., LeClair D., Ferrell L. (1998) The Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations: A Framework for Ethical Compliance. Journal of Business Ethics 17(4):353–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intensions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M. (1979) A Theory of Reasoned Action: Some Applications and Implications. In: Howe H., Page M. (eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp 65–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. Harper-Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith D., Hu M., Ryans J. (2000) Process Standardization Across Intra and Inter Cultural Relationships. Journal of International Business Studies 60(1):303–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett G., Betz N. (1989) An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/ Mathematics Performance Correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20(3):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn S. (1999) Whistleblowing: Implementing and Employee Hotline. Management Accounting 77(2):35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (1980) Culture’s Consequence: International Differences of Work Related Values. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (1997) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G. (2001) Culture’s Consequence: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions And Organizations Across Cultures, 2nd Ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Jex S., Gudanowski D. (1992) Efficacy Beliefs and Work Stress: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13(5):509–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jex S., Bliese P. (1999) Efficacy Beliefs as a Moderator of the Impact of Work-Related Stressors: A Multi-Level Study. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(3):349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D.: 2000, Public Service Whistleblowing Act. Legislative History of Bill S-13. Legislative Summaries, Library of Parliament. 18 January 2000. http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/bills

  • Jos P., Tompkins M., Hays S. (1989) In Praise of Difficult People: A Portrait of the Committed Whistleblower. Public Administration Review 49(6):552–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubb P. (1999) Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation. Journal of Business Ethics 21(1):77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan B., Kleiner B. (2000) New Developments Concerning Discrimination for Whistle Blowing. Equal Opportunities. 19(6–7):75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. (1998) Ethics Management: Auditing and Developing the Ethical Content of Organizations. Kluwar, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M. (2002) Guidelines for Developing an Ethics Safety Net. Journal of Business Ethics. 41(3):217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan J. (1990) Upper-Level Managers and Whistleblowing: Determinants and Perceptions of Company Encouragement and Information about Where to Blow the Whistle. Journal of Business and Psychology 5(2):223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan J., Krueger C. (1992) Whistle Blowing and the Professional. Management Accounting 74(2):21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • King G. (2000) The Implications of Differences in Cultural Attitudes and Styles of Communication on Peer Reporting Behavior. Cross-Cultural Management 7(2):11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S. (1989) Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the US and Canada. C.D. Howe Institute, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke E., Latham P. (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb S., Cory S. (1989) Whistleblowing and Management Accounting: An Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 8(12):903–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald G. (2000) Cross-Cultural Methodology Issues in Ethical Research. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1&2):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney B. (2002) Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Differences and their Consequences: A Triumph of Faith, a Failure of Analysis. Human Relations 55(1):89–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M., Dozier J., Near J. (1991) Blowing the Whistle on Data Fudging: A Controlled Field Experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 21(4):301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli M., Near J. (1992) Blowing the Whistle. Lexington Books, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N., Feltz D., Short S. (2004) Collective Efficacy and Team Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Collegiate Football Teams. Group Dynamics 8(2):126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near J., Miceli M. (1986) Retaliation against Whistle-Blowers: Predictions and Effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 7(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitte N. (1996) The Decline of Deference: Canadian Value Change in Cross-National Perspective. Broadview Press, Peterborough, OT

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel C. (2003) Some Cross-Cultural Evidence on Whistle Blowing as an Internal Control Mechanism. Journal of International Accounting Research 2:29–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesqas F., Kleiner B. (2001) The Difficulties of Whistleblowers Finding Employment. Management Research 24(3–4):97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild J., Miethe T. (1999) Whistleblower Disclosures and Management Retaliation: The Battle to Control Information about Organization Corruption. Work and Occupations 26(1):107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter J. (1966) Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs 80(1):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagiv L., Schwartz S. (2000) A New Look at National Culture. In: Ashkianasy N., Wilderom C., Peterson M. (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz S. (1990) Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and Proposed Refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21(2):139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer R. (1994) Optimistische Kompetenzerwartung: Zur Erfassung einer personellen Bewaltigungsressource. / Generalized Self-Efficacy: Assessment of a personal coping resource. Diagnostica 40(2):105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton S. (1990) Developing the Concept of General Self-Efficacy. Psychological Reports 66:287–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherer M., Maddux J., Mercadante B., Prentice-Dunn S., Jacobs B., Rogers R. (1982) The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports 51:663–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson J. (2000) Star-Spangled Canadians. Harper-Collins, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. and J. Keenan: 1998, ‚Predictors of External Whistleblowing: Organizational and Intrapersonal Variables’, 17(4), 411–421

  • Sims R., Keenan J. (1999) A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Managers’ Whistleblowing Tendencies. International Journal of Value Based Management 12(2):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer A. (1996) The Whistle Blower: Patriot or Bounty Hunter? Across the Board 29(11):16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Streiner D., Norman G. (1989) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Measurement and Use, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli A., Keenan J., Crnjak-Karanovic B. (2003) Culture and Whistleblowing: An Empirical Study of Croatian and United States Managers Utilizing Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics 43(1&2):49–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakolian H. (1994) Whistle Blowing: Preventative Strategies. Management Research News 17(1–2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L., Weaver G., Gibson D., Toffler B. (1999) Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Works and What Hurts. California Management Review 41(2):131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars F. (1993) Riding the Waves of Culture. Economist Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor B., Trevino L., Shapiro D. (1993) Peer-Reporting of Unethical Behavior: The Influence of Justice Evaluations and Social Context Factors. Journal of Business Ethics 12(4):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinten G. (1992) Whistle Blowing: Corporate Help or Hindrance? Management Decision 30(1):44–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin A. (1981) Whistleblowing: Loyalty and Dissent in the Corporation. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise T. (1995) An Analysis of Factors Proposed to Affect the Decision to Blow the Whistle on Unethical Acts. Doctoral Dissertation. Louisiana Tech. University, Ruston, LA

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellars K., Hochwarter W., Perrewe P., Miles A., Keiwitz C. (2001) Beyond Self-Efficacy: Interactive Effects of Role Conflict and Perceived Collective Efficacy. Journal of Managerial Issues 13(4):483–500

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Business, University of Sydney, Building H03, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia

    Brent R. MacNab

  2. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Reginald Worthley

Authors
  1. Brent R. MacNab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Reginald Worthley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brent R. MacNab.

Additional information

Brent R. MacNab is a faculty member in the discipline of International Business with the University of Sydney. Brent’s research interests focus on examination of cross-cultural and intra-cultural phenomena as related to management and human interaction issues like cultural intelligence, ethics management and workplace motivation. He has received two Fulbright Awards (Canada, 2002 and NAFTA focus 2003) for examination of his research in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. In addition to faculty duties Brent also acts as a consultant to organizations examining issues related to cultural training and ethics management.

Reginald Worthley is a faculty member with the University of Hawai'i at Manoa where he teaches coursework in applied quantitative analysis. He specializes in survey research on various cross-cultural issues. Recent studies include a web survey quantifying motivational drivers in the Japanese workplace, a comparative longitudinal study of managerial values in six countries and a NAFTA study of cultural identity as related to defined areas of ethics management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacNab, B.R., Worthley, R. Self-Efficacy as an Intrapersonal Predictor for Internal Whistleblowing: A US and Canada Examination. J Bus Ethics 79, 407–421 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9407-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9407-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation