Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 78, Issue 1–2, pp 109–120 | Cite as

Biblical Safeguards and Traditions as Potential Guidance for the Lending of Monies

  • Ellen J. Lippman
Article

Abstract

Some individuals and businesses have become increasingly dependent upon multiple financing sources for economic survival. Certain currently used lending policies, such as interest-only loans and revolving credit lines, may encourage borrower dependency on the lender. The paper reviews religious teachings, specifically religious safeguards on lending identified in primary Jewish sources including the Tanach and rabbinic teachings, and finds that the safeguards in place centuries ago may still be relevant for lending practices today to both protect the borrower while still providing a profitable means to help borrowers.

Keywords

interest Jewish loans religious teachings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author thanks Rabbis Michael Paley and David Rosenberg and the participants at the 12th Annual International Conference Promoting Business Ethics, and in particular Joshua Fogel, for their useful comments.

References

  1. Breitowitz, Y.: 1998, ‘Bankruptcy: A Halakhic Perspective’, in Jewish Law: Examining Halacha, Jewish Issues, and Secular Law: Retrieved on December 20, 2005: http://jlaw.com/Articles/bank.htmlGoogle Scholar
  2. Gamoran H. (1981) The Talmudic Law of Mortgages in View of the Prohibition Against Lending on Interest. Hebrew Union College Annual 52: 153–162Google Scholar
  3. Joselit J. W. (1992) Lending Dignity: The First Hundred Years of the Hebrew Free Loan Society of New York. Hebrew Free Loan Society of New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Kahr, A.: 2004, October 10. ‘Interview with Andrew Kahr’, Retrieved October 20th, 2005: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/credit/interviews/kahr.html
  5. Levine A. (1980) Free Enterprise and Jewish Law’, Aspects of Jewish Business Ethics. Ktav Publishing House, Inc., Yeshiva University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewison M. (1999) Conflicts of Interest? The Ethics of Usury. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (4): 327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Neufeld E. (2004) The Prohibitions against Loans in Ancient Hebrew Laws. Hebrew Union College Annual 26.01: 355–370Google Scholar
  8. Novak, D.: 1990, ‘Economics and Justice: A Jewish example’, in Peter L. Berger (ed.), Capitalist Spirit:Towards a Religious Ethic of Wealth Creation (ICS Pr., San Francisco), pp. 31–50Google Scholar
  9. Schein A. (2003) Of Biblical Interest, Brotherhood, and Clarity. International Journal of Social Economics, Bradford 30(7/8): 788–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Soloveitchik, H.: 1970, ‘Pawnbroking; A Study in Ribbit and of the Halakah in Exile’, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 38–39, 203–268Google Scholar
  11. Talmud Bavli Metzia, The Schottenstein Edition.: 1997, (Mesorah Publications, Ltd., Brooklyn, NY) Chapter 5Google Scholar
  12. The Tanakh, The Holy Scriptures.: 1985, (The Jewish Publication Society, Philadelphia)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dr. Robert B. Pamblin School of Business Administration, University of PortlandPortlandU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations