Abstract
In this paper we open up the topic of ethical corporate identity: what we believe to be a new, as well as highly salient, field of inquiry for scholarship in ethics and corporate social responsibility. Taking as our starting point Balmer’s (in Balmer and Greyser, 2002) AC2ID test model of corporate identity – a pragmatic tool of identity management – we explore the specificities of an ethical form of corporate identity. We draw key insights from conceptualizations of corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory. We argue ethical identity potentially takes us beyond the personification of the corporation. Instead, ethical identity is seen to be formed relationally, between parties, within a community of business and social exchange. Extending the AC2ID test model, we suggest the management of ethical identity requires a more socially, dialogically embedded kind of corporate practice and greater levels of critical reflexivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anonymous: 2003, ‘Co-op has Credibility but Needs Fresh Look’, Marketing, June 23, 13
Antonacopoulou E. P., J. Méric 2005, A Critique of Stake-holder Theory: Management Science of a Sophisticated Ideology of Control? Corporate Governance, 5(2):22–33
Aristotle: 1998, Politics. Trans. by C. D. C. Reeve. (Indianapolis: Hackett)
Balmer, J. M. T. and S. A. Greyser 2002, ‹Managing the Multiple Identities of the Corporation’, California Management Review, 44(3), 72–86
Balmer J. M. T., E. R. Gray 1999, Corporate Identity and Corporate Communications: Creating Competitive Advantage, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4):171–176
Balmer J. M. T., G. B. Soenen 1999, The Acid Test of Corporate Identity Management, Journal of Marketing Management 15:69–92
Bowen H. R. 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row, New York
Buchholz R. A., S. B. Rosenthal 2005, Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Business Ethics, 58:13–148
Buchholz R. A. 2004, The Natural Environment: Does it Count? Academy of Management Executive 18(2):130–133
Carroll A. B. 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4):497–505
Clark, N.: 2006, ‘Going the Extra Mile’, Marketing, May 4, 18
Croft N 2005, Authentic Business. Capstone Publishing Limited, Chichester
Gray E. R., K. Petropoulos 2002, Tom’s of Maine. Loyola Marymount University Case Study, Los Angeles
Gray E. R., J. M. T. Balmer 1998, Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation Long Range Planning 31(5), 695–702
Hay R. D., E. R. Gray 1974, Social Responsibilities of Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17(1):135–143
Henriques I, P. Sadorsky 1999, The Relationship between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1):89–99
Maignan, I. and O. C. Ferrell: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3–19
McAfee N. 2000, Habermas, Kristeva, and Citizenship. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London
Monks, R.: 2004, Interview in the Corporation, Film directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott (2 Disc Special Edition), Big Picture Media Corporation
Swanson D. L. 1995, Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20(1):43–64
Van Riel C. B. M. 1995, Principles of Corporate Communication. Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Wicks A. C., D. R. Gilbert, R. H. Freeman 1994, A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4):475–497
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
John M. T. Balmer is Professor of Corporate Brand/Identity Management at Bradford University School of Management. His research focuses on a range of corporate-level marketing issues and has a particular interest in the management of corporate brands and identities. His work has been published in leading journals such as California Management Review and Long Range Planning. With Stephen Greyser he co-authored Revealing the Corporation (Routledge, 2003).
Kyoko Fukukawa is a lecturer in marketing at Bradford University School of Management and holds a Ph.D. from University of Nottingham, UK. Her research interests include ethical decision-making in consumption and business practices; corporate social responsibility (CSR) of MNCs concerning their policies and strategic communication; and CSR and corporate branding. Her publications appear in Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Corporate Citizenship and others.
Edmund R. Gray is Professor and Chair in the Department of Management at Loyola Marymount University. He is author or co-author of five textbooks and numerous scholarly articles. He holds a Ph.D. from UCLA. His research interests centre around issues of corporate identity, corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Currently, he is conducting research on entrepreneurial firms with environmental/social goals that are an integral part of their mission.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balmer, J.M.T., Fukukawa, K. & Gray, E.R. The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identity: A Commentary on Corporate Identity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics. J Bus Ethics 76, 7–15 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9278-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9278-z