Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 7–15 | Cite as

The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identity: A Commentary on Corporate Identity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics

  • John M. T. Balmer
  • Kyoko Fukukawa
  • Edmund R. Gray


In this paper we open up the topic of ethical corporate identity: what we believe to be a new, as well as highly salient, field of inquiry for scholarship in ethics and corporate social responsibility. Taking as our starting point Balmer’s (in Balmer and Greyser, 2002) AC2ID test model of corporate identity – a pragmatic tool of identity management – we explore the specificities of an ethical form of corporate identity. We draw key insights from conceptualizations of corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory. We argue ethical identity potentially takes us beyond the personification of the corporation. Instead, ethical identity is seen to be formed relationally, between parties, within a community of business and social exchange. Extending the AC2ID test model, we suggest the management of ethical identity requires a more socially, dialogically embedded kind of corporate practice and greater levels of critical reflexivity.


AC2ID test corporate social responsibility corporate identity stakeholders ethical identity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous: 2003, ‘Co-op has Credibility but Needs Fresh Look’, Marketing, June 23, 13Google Scholar
  2. Antonacopoulou E. P., J. Méric 2005, A Critique of Stake-holder Theory: Management Science of a Sophisticated Ideology of Control? Corporate Governance, 5(2):22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle: 1998, Politics. Trans. by C. D. C. Reeve. (Indianapolis: Hackett)Google Scholar
  4. Balmer, J. M. T. and S. A. Greyser 2002, ‹Managing the Multiple Identities of the Corporation’, California Management Review, 44(3), 72–86Google Scholar
  5. Balmer J. M. T., E. R. Gray 1999, Corporate Identity and Corporate Communications: Creating Competitive Advantage, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4):171–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balmer J. M. T., G. B. Soenen 1999, The Acid Test of Corporate Identity Management, Journal of Marketing Management 15:69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen H. R. 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchholz R. A., S. B. Rosenthal 2005, Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory, Journal of Business Ethics, 58:13–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchholz R. A. 2004, The Natural Environment: Does it Count? Academy of Management Executive 18(2):130–133Google Scholar
  10. Carroll A. B. 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4):497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, N.: 2006, ‘Going the Extra Mile’, Marketing, May 4, 18Google Scholar
  12. Croft N 2005, Authentic Business. Capstone Publishing Limited, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray E. R., K. Petropoulos 2002, Tom’s of Maine. Loyola Marymount University Case Study, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray E. R., J. M. T. Balmer 1998, Managing Corporate Image and Corporate Reputation Long Range Planning 31(5), 695–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hay R. D., E. R. Gray 1974, Social Responsibilities of Business Managers. Academy of Management Journal, 17(1):135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henriques I, P. Sadorsky 1999, The Relationship between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1):89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maignan, I. and O. C. Ferrell: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32(1), 3–19Google Scholar
  18. McAfee N. 2000, Habermas, Kristeva, and Citizenship. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Monks, R.: 2004, Interview in the Corporation, Film directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott (2 Disc Special Edition), Big Picture Media CorporationGoogle Scholar
  20. Swanson D. L. 1995, Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20(1):43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Riel C. B. M. 1995, Principles of Corporate Communication. Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Wicks A. C., D. R. Gilbert, R. H. Freeman 1994, A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4):475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. T. Balmer
    • 1
  • Kyoko Fukukawa
    • 1
  • Edmund R. Gray
    • 2
  1. 1.Bradford University School of ManagementBradfordUK
  2. 2.Loyola Marymount UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations