Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 285–300 | Cite as

Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index

  • M. Victoria López
  • Arminda Garcia
  • Lazaro Rodriguez


The goal of this paper is to examine whether business performance is affected by the adoption of practices included under the term Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). To achieve this goal, we analyse the relation between CSR and certain accounting indicators and examine whether there exist significant differences in performance indicators between European firms that have adopted CSR and others that have not. The effects of compliance with the requirements of CSR were determined on the basis of firms included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI), and specific accounting indicators were applied to measure performance. For the purposes of this study, we selected one group of firms belonging to the DJSI and another comprised of firms quoted on the Dow Jones Global Index (DJGI) but not on the DJSI. The sample was made up of two groups of 55 firms, studied for the period 1998–2004. Empirical analysis supports the conclusion that differences in performance exist between firms that belong to the DJSI and to the DJGI and that these differences are related to CSR practices. We find that a short-term negative impact on performance is produced.


competitive advantage value creating sustainable development performance Dow Jones Sustainability Index 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams C. (2002). Internal Organizational Factors Influencing Corporate Social and Ethical Reporting: Beyond Current Theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 15(2):223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams C., Zutshi A. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Business Should Act Responsibly and Be Accountable. Australian Accounting Review 14(3):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agle R. B., Mitchell R. K., Sonnenfeld J. A. (1999). Who Matters to CEOs? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance, and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal 42(5):507–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander E. C. (2002). Consumer Reactions to Unethical Service Recovery. Journal of Business Ethics 36(3):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansal P. (2002). The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development. Academy of Management Executive 16(2):122–131Google Scholar
  6. Baucus M. S. (1989). Why Firms Do It and What Happens to Them: A Reexamination of the Theory of Illegal Corporate Behavior. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 11:93–118Google Scholar
  7. Bebbington J. (2001). Sustainable Development: A Review of the International Development, Business and Accounting Literature. Accounting Forum 25(2):128–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bendell, J. and K. Kearins: 2004. ‚The Political Bottom Line: The Emerging Dimension to Corporate Responsibility for Sustainable Development’, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper 2004, C1–C6.Google Scholar
  9. Bernhut, S.: 2002, ‚Corporate Social Responsibility with Pratima Bansal’, IVEY Business Journal 66(4), 18–19, 59.Google Scholar
  10. Blyth A. (2005). Finding the Measure. Accountancy 135:28–29Google Scholar
  11. Bond S. (2005). The Global Challenge of Sustainable Consumption. Consumer Policy Review 15(2):38–44Google Scholar
  12. Bromiley P., Marcus A. (1989). The Deterrent to Dubious Corporate Behaviour: Profitability, Probability, and Safety Recalls. Strategic Management Journal 10(3):233–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchholz R. A., Rosenthal S. B. (2005). Toward a Contemporary Conceptual Framework for Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 58(1):137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgess J. (2003). Sustainable Consumption: Is It Really Achievable? Consumer Policy Review 13(3):78–84Google Scholar
  15. Campbell D., Craven B., Shrives P. (2002). Voluntary Social Reporting in Three FTSE Sectors: A Comment on Perception and Legitimacy. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 16(4):558–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll A. B. (2000). A Commentary and an Overview of Key Questions on Corporate Social Performance Measurement. Business & Society 39(4):466–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen K. H., Metcalf R.W. (1980). The Relationship between Pollution Control Record and Financial Indicators Revisited. Accounting Review 55(1):168–177Google Scholar
  18. Cheney, G.: 2004, The Corporate Conscience and the␣Triple BottomLine’, Accounting Today July(12), 13–14.Google Scholar
  19. Cochran P. L., Wood R. A. (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 27(1):42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, J. C. and J. I. Porras: 1994. Built To Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, Edit. HarperBusiness, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson W. N., Worrell D. L. (1988). The Impact of Announcements of Corporate Illegalities on Shareholder Returns. Academy of Management Journal 31(1):195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Deegan C., Gordon B. (1996). A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26(3):187–199Google Scholar
  23. Deegan C. (2000). Financial Accounting Theory. Irwin McGraw-Hill, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  24. Deephouse D. L. (1996). Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal 39(4):1024–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dovers S. (1989). Sustainability: Definitions, Clarifications and Contexts. Development 2(3):33–36Google Scholar
  26. Dye R. A. (1985). Disclosure of Non-Proprietary Information. Journal of Accounting Research 23(1):123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans C. (2003). Sustainability: The Bottom Line. Accountancy 131(1313): 16Google Scholar
  28. Fishman M. J., Hagerty K. M. (1989). Disclosure Decisions by Firms and the Competition for Price Efficiency. Journal of Finance 44(3):633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fogler H. R., Nutt F. (1975). A Note on Social Responsibility and Stock Valuation. Academy of Management Journal 18(1):155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fombrun C., Shanley M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33(2):233–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frankel R., McNichols M., Wilson G. P. (1995). Discretionary Disclosure and External Financing. The Accounting Review 70(1):135–150Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, `Strategic Management: A strategic Approach’ (Ed. Pitman, Boston)Google Scholar
  33. Friedman, M.: 1970. ‚The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine 32–33, 122, 126.Google Scholar
  34. Frooman J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2):191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gelb D. S., Strawser J. A. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics 33(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gladwin T. N., Kennelly J. J., Krause T. (1995). Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review 20(4):874–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gomez E., Rodriguez L. (2004). An Empirical Study on the Size Factor as a Business Determinant. Revista de Contabilidad 7(13):167–198Google Scholar
  38. Gray R., Kouhy R., Lavers S. (1995). Methodological Themes: Constructing a Research Database of Social and Environmental Reporting by UK Companies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(2):78–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Griffin J. J., Mahon J. F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business and Society 36(1):5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Guthrie J. E., Parker L. D. (1989). Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting and Business Research 9(76):343–352Google Scholar
  41. Hardjano T., Klein P. de (2004). Intrduction on the European Corporate Sustainability Framework.Journal of Business Ethics 55(2):99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hart, S. L. and M. B. Milstein: 1999, ‚Global Sustainability and the Creative Destruction of Industries’, Sloan Management Review Fall, 23–33.Google Scholar
  43. Hart S. L., Milstein M. B. (2003). Creating Sustainable Value. Academy of Management Executive 17(2):56–69Google Scholar
  44. Hedstrom, G., S. Poltorzycki, and P. Stroh: 1998, ‚Sustainable Development: The Next Generation of Business Opportunity’, Prism, Fourth Quarter, 5–19, [online] (cited 24 may 2006). Available at: www. Scholar
  45. Ho C. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corporate Competitiveness: An International Analysis. Corporate Governance 13(2):211–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoffer G. E., Pruitt S. W., Reilly R. J. (1988). The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers: A Reexamination. Journal of Political Economy 96(3):663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ingram R., Skinner S. J., Taylor V. A. (2005). Consumers’ Evaluation of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 62(3):237–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kettinger, W., V. Grover, S. Guha and A. Segar: 1994, ‚Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance’, MIS Quarterly March, 31–58.Google Scholar
  49. King, A.: 2002, ‚How to Get Started in Corporate Social Responsibility’, Financial Management October, 5Google Scholar
  50. Korac-Kakabadse N., Kakabadse A. K., Kouzmin A. (2001). Board Governance and Company Performance: Any Correlations?. Corporate Governance 1(1):24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lang M., Lundholm R. (2000). Voluntary Disclosures and Equity Offerings: Reducing Information Asymmetry or Hyping the Stock. Contemporary Accounting Research 17(4):623–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lindblom, C. K.: 1994, ‚The Implications of Organizational Legitimacy for Corporate Social Performance and Disclosure’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Majumdar S. K., Marcus A. A. (2001). Rules versus Discretion: The Productivity Consequences of Flexible Regulations. Academy of Management Journal 44(1):170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Makower, J.: 1994, Beyond The Bottom Line: Putting Social Responsibility to Work for Your Business and the World (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  55. Markides C. C., Williamson P. J. (1994). Related Diversification, Core Competences and Corporate Performance. Strategic Management Journal 15(Summer):149–165Google Scholar
  56. Marquardt C., Wiedman C. (1998). Voluntary Disclosure, Information Asymmetry, and Insider Selling Through Secondary Equity Offerings. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(4):505–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGuire J. B., Sundgren A., Schneeweis T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 31(4):854–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McWilliams A., Siegel D. (2000). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal 21(5):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Michael B., Gross R. (2004). Running Business like a Government in the New Economy: Lessons for Organizational Design and Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance 4(3):32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nobes, C.: 1994, Interpreting European Financial Statements (Butterworth & Co, UK).Google Scholar
  61. Ogrizek M. (2002). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Branding of Financial Services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 6(3):215–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rynes S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis. Organizational Studies 24(3):403–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Patten D. M. (1992). Intra-Industry Environmental Disclosures in Response to the Alaskan Oil Spill: A Note on Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(5):471–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Preston L. E., O’Bannon D. P. (1997). The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship: A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society 36(4):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reed, L., K. Getz, D. Collins, W. Oberman and R. Toy: 1990, ‚Theoretical Models and Empirical Results: A␣Review and Synthesis of JAI volumes 1–10’, In Lee␣Preston (ed.), Corporation and Society Research: Studies in Theory and Measurement (Greenwich, CT, JAI␣Press) pp. 27–62.Google Scholar
  66. Rodriguez L., Gomez E. (2002). Activity: Has It Any Effect on the Economic and Finantial Situation of the Firms? Revista de Contabilidad 5(10):137–178Google Scholar
  67. Rumelt R. (1991). How Much Does Industry Matter?. Strategic Management Journal 12(3):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sage A. P. (1999). Sustainable Development: Issues in Information, Knowledge, and Systems Management. Information, Knowledge and System Management 1(3–4):185–223Google Scholar
  69. Schmalensee R. (1985). Do Markets Differ Much?. American Economic Review 75(3):341–351Google Scholar
  70. Scott, M., and H. Rothman: 1994, Companies with a Conscience: Intimate Portraits of Twelve Firms That Make a Difference (Ed. Citadel Press, New York).Google Scholar
  71. Sengupta P. (1998). Corporate Disclosure Quality and the Cost of Debt. The Accounting Review 73(4):459–474Google Scholar
  72. Serageldin, I.: 1994, Making Development Sustainable: From Concept to Action (Ed. World Bank, Washington, D.C)Google Scholar
  73. Simpson W. G., Kohers T. (2002). The Link between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 35(2):97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Social Investment Forum: 2003, ‚Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States’, [online] (cited 31 august 2006). Available at: Scholar
  75. Stanwick P. A., Stanwick S. D. (1998). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Size, Financial Performance, and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 17(2):195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. SustainAbility: 2004, ‚Values for Money: Reviewing the Quality of SRI Research’, [online]. Available at: Scholar
  77. Verrecchia R. (1983). Discretionary Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(3):179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vitell S., Muncy J. (1992). Consumer Ethics: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing Ethical Judgments of the Final Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics 11(8):585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weigelt K., Camerer C. (1988). Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications. Strategic Management Journal 9(5):443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wenzel L., Thiewes H. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Does It Pay?. Journal of Accounting and Finance Research 7(4):48–58Google Scholar
  82. Wokutch R. E., McKinney E. W. (1991). Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 12:309–330Google Scholar
  83. World Commission On Environment And Development: 1987, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  84. Zyglidopoulos S. C. (2002). The Social and Environmental Responsibilities of Multinationals: Evidence from the Brent Spar Case. Journal of Business Ethics 36(1–2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Victoria López
    • 1
  • Arminda Garcia
    • 1
  • Lazaro Rodriguez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Financial Economy and AccountingUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations