Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, 63:195 | Cite as

Apologies and Transformational Leadership

  • Sean Tucker
  • Nick Turner
  • Julian Barling
  • Erin M. Reid
  • Cecilia Elving
Article

Abstract

This empirical investigation showed that contrary to the popular notion that apologies signify weakness, the victims of mistakes made by leaders consistently perceived leaders who apologized as more transformational than those who did not apologize. In a field experiment (Study 1), male referees who were perceived as having apologized for mistakes made officiating hockey games were rated by male coaches (n = 93) as more transformational than when no apology was made. Studies 2 (n = 50) and 3 (n = 224) replicated this effect in two vignette studies to enhance internal and ecological validity. Contrary to expectations in Study 3, there were no apology×leader gender interactions. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Key Words

apologies moral leadership transformational leadership 

References

  1. Avolio, B. 1999Full Leadership Development: Building the␣Vital Forces in OrganizationsSage PublicationsLondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Barling, J., Loughlin, C., Kelloway, E. K. 2002Development and Test of a Model Linking Safety-specific Transformational Leadership and Occupational SafetyJournal of Applied Psychology87488496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barling, J., Weber, T., Kelloway, E. K. 1996Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experimentJournal of Applied Psychology81827832Google Scholar
  4. Bass, B., Steidlmeier, P. 1999Ethics, Character and Authentic Transformational Leadership BehaviourLeadership Quarterly10181217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass, B. M. 1998Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational ImpactErlbaumHillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Atwater, L. 1996The Transformational and Transactional Leadership of Men and WomenInternational Review of Applied Psychology45534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. 1995The Multifactor Leadership QuestionnaireConsulting Psychologists PressPalo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, P., Luckman, T. 1966The Social Construction of RealityAnchor BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard, K., McBride, M. 2003The One Minute ApologyHarperCollinsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S. E., Murnighan, J. K. 2002When Talk is not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding CooperationOrganization Science13497513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brand, R., Ness, W. 2004Rule Administration and Game Management: Qualifying Characteristics of Referees in Sport GamesZeitschrift für Sportpsychologie11127136Google Scholar
  12. Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., Mann, L. 2000A Short Measure of Transformational LeadershipJournal of Business and Psychology14389405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charbonneau, D., Barling, J., Kelloway, K. E. 2001Transformational Leadership and Sports Performance: The Mediating Role of Intrinsic MotivationJournal of Applied Social Psychology3115211534Google Scholar
  14. Chen, C. C., Meindl, J. R. 1991The Construction of Leadership Images in the Popular Press: The Case of Donald Burr and People ExpressAdministrative Science Quarterly36521551Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, W. H., Richardson, A. J. 1986Unfair ComparisonsJournal of Applied Psychology71179184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Engen, M. 2003Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-analysis Comparing Women and MenPsychological Bulletin129569591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K., Finkel, E. J. 2004Too Proud to Let Go: Narcissistic Entitlement as a Barrier to ForgivenessJournal of Personality and Social Psychology87894912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folger, R., Skarlicki, D. P. 2001Fairness as a Dependent Variable: Why Tough Times Can Lead to Bad ManagementCropanzano, R. eds. Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to PracticeErlbaumMahwah, NH97118Google Scholar
  19. Folkes, V. S., Whang, Yun-Oh 2003Account-giving for a Corporate Transgression Influences Moral Judgment: When those Who “Spin” Condone Harm-doingJournal of Applied Psychology887986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giacalone, R. A., Payne, S. L. 1995Evaluation of Employee Rule Violations: The Impact of Impression Management Effects in Historical ContextJournal of Business Ethics14477487Google Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. 1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public OrderBasic Books IncNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gonzales, M. H., Pederson, J. H., Manning, D. J., Wetter, D. W. 1990Pardon my Gaffe: Effects of Sex, Status, and Consequence Severity on AccountsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology58610621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonzales, M. H., Debra, J. M., Julie, A. H. 1992Explaining Our Sins: Factors Influencing Offender Accounts and Anticipated Victim ResponsesJournal of Personality and Social Psychology62958971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgins, H. S., Liebeskind, E. 2003Apology Versus Defense: Antecedents and ConsequencesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology39297316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodgins, H. S., Liebeskind, E., Schwartz, W. 1996Getting Out of Hot Water: Facework in Social PredicamentsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology71300314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ittenbach, R. F., Eller, B. F. 1988A Personality Profile of Southeastern Conference Football OfficialsJournal of Sports Behavior11115125Google Scholar
  27. Irvin, D. 1997Tough Calls: NHL Referees and Linesmen Tell Their StoryMcClelland & Stewart Inc.TorontoGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackall, R. 1988Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate ManagersOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Judge, T., Bono, J. 2001Five-factor Model of Personality and Transformational LeadershipJournal of Applied Psychology85751765Google Scholar
  30. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., Dirks, K. T. 2004Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence-versus Integrity-based Trust ViolationsJournal of Applied Psychology89104118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lazare, A. 2004On ApologyOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu, J., Wilson, D. 2001The Unchanging Perception of Women as ManagersWomen in Management Review16163174Google Scholar
  33. Mills, N 2001‘The New Culture of Apology’Dissent (Fall)48113116Google Scholar
  34. Neckers, B. W. 2002The Art of the ApologyMichigan Bar Journal811011Google Scholar
  35. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., Agarie, N. 1989Apology as Aggression Control: Its Role in Mediating Appraisal of Response to HarmJournal of Personality and Social Psychology56219227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaubroeck, J., May, D. R., Brown, F. W. 1994Procedural Justice Explanations and Employee Reactions to Economics Hardship: A Field ExperimentJournal of Applied Psychology79455460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlenker, B. R. 1980Impression Management: The Self-concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal RelationsBrooks/ColeMonterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott, M., Lyman, S. 1968AccountsAmerican Sociological Review334662Google Scholar
  39. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Förster, N., Montada, L. 2004Effects of Objective and Subjective Account Components on ForgivingJournal of Social Psychology144465485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sigal, J., Hsu, L., Foodim, S., Betman, J. 1988Factors Affecting Perceptions of Political Candidates Accused of Sexual and Financial MisconductPolitical Psychology9273280Google Scholar
  41. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., Gee, J. O. 2004‘When Social Accounts Backfire: Effects of a Polite Message or an Apology on Reactions to an Unfair Outcome’Journal of Applied Social Psychology34322341Google Scholar
  42. Tata, J. 1998The Influence of Gender on the Use and Effectiveness of Managerial AccountsGroup and Organization Management23267288Google Scholar
  43. Tata, J. 2000She Said, He Said. The Influence of Remedial Accounts on Third-party Judgments of Coworker Sexual HarassmentJournal of Management2611331156Google Scholar
  44. Timson, J.: 2003, ‘The Sorry State of Apology’, The Globe and Mail, March 19: C1 and C6.Google Scholar
  45. Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J. 2004The Road to Reconciliation: Antecedents of Victim Willingness to Reconcile Following a Broken PromiseJournal of Management30165187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turner, N., Barling, J., Epitropaki, O., Butcher, V., Milner, C. 2002Transformational Leadership and Moral ReasoningJournal of Applied Psychology87304311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wann, D. L., Metcalf, L. A., Brewer, K. R., Whiteside, H. D. 2000Development of the Power in Sport QuestionnaireJournal of Sport Behavior23423443Google Scholar
  48. Weeks, H.: 2003, The art of the Apology, Harvard Management Update (on-line edition), http://hbswk.hbs. edu/pubitem.jhtml?id=3481&t=career_effectiveness
  49. Witvliet, C. V. O., Worthington, E. L.,Jr., Wade, N. G. 2002Victims’ Heart Rate and Facial EMG Responses to Receiving an Apology and RestitutionPsychophysiology39S88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean Tucker
    • 1
  • Nick Turner
    • 1
  • Julian Barling
    • 1
  • Erin M. Reid
    • 1
  • Cecilia Elving
    • 1
  1. 1.Queen’s School of BusinessQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations