Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 59, Issue 1–2, pp 155–162 | Cite as

Stopping the Exploitation of Workers: An Analysis of the Effective Application of Consumer or Socio-Political Pressure

  • Gina L. S. Pines
  • David G. Meyer
Article

Abstract

Commodity chain analysis (Bair and Ramsay, 2003 Multinational Companies and Global Human Resource Strategies) is used to explore where economic pressure (from consumers) or socio-political pressure (from governments and NGOs) can be applied to reduce worker exploitation. Six paths are illustrated with examples of successful and unsuccessful application of pressure. Three conclusions are reached :Economic pressure on companies and brand owners is more likely to lead to improved workplace conditions than socio-political pressure; Brand owners are more likely to implement improved workplace conditions than retailers; and Retailers who are under extreme consumer price pressure will resist improving workplace conditions.

Keywords

brand value commodity chains price pressure successful boycotts unsuccessful boycotts worker exploitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T., Louviere, J. 2003‘What Will Consumers Pay for Social Product Features’Journal of Business Ethics42281304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bair, J., Ramsay, H. 2003‘MNCs and Global Commodity Chains: Implications for Labor Strategies’Cooke, W. eds. Multinational Companies and Global Human Resource StrategiesQuorumWestport, CTGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran, P., Sweezy, P. 1966Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social OrderPenguinHarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnet, R., Miller, R. 1974Global Reach. The Power of the Multinational CorporationsSimon and SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedman, M. 1985‘Consumer Boycotts in the United States, 1970–1980: Contemporary Events in Historical Perspective’The Journal of Consumer Affairs1996117Google Scholar
  6. Gereffi, G. 1999‘International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain’Journal of International Economics483770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golub, S. 1997‘Are International Labor Standards Necessary to Prevent Social Dumping?’Finance & Development342024Google Scholar
  8. Greenhouse, S.: 1997, ‘Sporting Goods Concerns Agree to Combat Sale of Soccer Balls Made by Children’, New York Times February 14, 1997, 12.Google Scholar
  9. Hemphill, T. 2004‘Monitoring Global Corporate Citizenship: Industry Self–regulation at a Crossroads’The Journal of Corporate Citizenship148192Google Scholar
  10. Herbert, B.: 1997, ‘Nike’s Boot Camps’, New York Times, March 31, 1997, A–15.Google Scholar
  11. Hymer, S. 1971‘The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development’Baghwati, J. eds. Economics and the World OrderWorld Law FundNew York11340Google Scholar
  12. John, A., Klein, J. 2003‘The Boycott Puzzle: Consumer Motivations for Purchase Sacrifice’Management Science4911961209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaufman, A., Tiantubtim, E., Pussayapibul, N., Davids, P. 2004‘Implementing Voluntary Labour Standards and Codes of Conduct in the Thai Garment Industry’The Journal of Corporate Citizenship1391100Google Scholar
  14. Knickerbocker, B.: 1997, ‘Nike Fights Full–Court Press on Labor Issue. Shareholder meeting yesterday was marred by charges that Asian labor is underpaid’, Christian Science Monitor, September 23, 1997, 9.Google Scholar
  15. Liubicic, R. 1998‘Corporate Codes of Conduct and Product Labeling Schemes: The Limits and Possibilities of Promoting International Labor Rights through Private Initiatives’Law and Policy in International Business30111159Google Scholar
  16. Marketing Week 2004, ‘How the American Dream Became a Global Nightmare’, June 3, 2004, 32.Google Scholar
  17. Narayan, N. 1997‘Stolen Childhoods: Tackling the Health Burdens of Child Labor’Harvard International Review195054Google Scholar
  18. Porter, M. 1985Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior PerformanceFree PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Sen, S., Gurhan–Canli, Z., Morwitz, V. 2001‘Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts’Journal of Consumer Research28399417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sethi, S. P. 1996‘Working with International Codes of Conduct: Experience of U.S. Companies Operating in South Africa Under the Sullivan Principles’Business & the Contemporary WorldIII129150Google Scholar
  21. Sethi, S. P.: 1999, ‘Codes of Conduct for Multinational Corporations: An Idea Whose Time Has Come’, First Annual Lecture in Global Business Ethics. Fairfield University,March, 1999.Google Scholar
  22. Varley, P. eds. 1998The Sweatshop QuandaryInvestor Responsibility Research CenterWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  23. Wotruba, T. 1997‘Industry Self–regulation: A Review and Extention to a Global Setting’Journal of Public Policy and Marketing163854Google Scholar
  24. www.beneaththelabel.org, 2/16/2004Google Scholar
  25. www.fairlabor.org, 2/16/2004Google Scholar
  26. www.nlcnet.org, 2/24/2004 The National Labor Committee in Support of Human and Worker Rights. Toys of Misery.Google Scholar
  27. www.sweatshops.org, 2004Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gina L. S. Pines
    • 1
  • David G. Meyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Business Strategy and PolicyUniversity of HartfordWest HartfordUSA
  2. 2.Management and OrganizationCentral Connecticut State UniversityNew BritainUSA

Personalised recommendations