Abstract
This paper considers ethical decision making by blending three streams of related research: cognitive moral development of the decision maker, rational choice theory and a subjective expected utility model. Ethical dilemmas can be defined as situations where moral certainty is compromised by rational cognition. In this paper, the authors assume that some people use a morality-first perspective and others a rationality-first perspective. Ethical scenarios were written and used to test hypotheses derived from this perspective. The instrument developed was shown to be in need of further refinement. Results are discussed in terms of relationships between participant-characteristics variables overall and subscale responses to the ethical scenarios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. S. Coleman (1990) Foundations of Social Theory Harvard University Press Cambridge
R. S. Fudge J. L. Schlacter (1999) ArticleTitle‘Motivating Employees to Act Ethically: An Expectancy Theory Approach’ Journal of Business Ethics 18 IssueID3 295–304 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005801022353
E. D. Honeycutt M. Glassman SuffixJr. M. T. Zugelder K. Karande (2001) ArticleTitle‘Determinants of ethical behavior: A study of autosalespeople’ Journal of Business Ethics 32 IssueID1 69–79 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010704409683
L. Kohlberg (1976) ‘Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive Developmental Approach’ T. Lickona (Eds) Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues Holt Rinehart, dc Winston New York 31–53
L. Kohlberg (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages Harper & Row San Francisco
C. H. Lawshe (1975) ArticleTitle‘A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity’ Personnel Psychology 28 563–575
R. Louden (1984) ArticleTitle‘On Some Vices of Virtue Ethics’ American Philosophical Quarterly 21 227–36
E. Marnburg (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings’ Journal of Business Ethics 32 IssueID4 275–283 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1010643309056
D. S. Nagin R. Paternoster (1993) ArticleTitle‘Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime’ Law and Society Review 27 467–496
D. S. Nagin R. Paternoster (1994) ArticleTitle‘Personal Capital and Social Control: The Deterrence Implications of a Theory of Individual Differences in Criminal Offending’ Criminology 32 IssueID4 581–598
J. R. Rest (1979) Development in Judging Moral Issues University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
I. Roozen D. Pelzsmacker Particlede F. Bostyn (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Ethical Dimensions of Decision Processes of Employees’ Journal of Business Ethics 33 IssueID2 87–99 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017536222355
V. H. Vroom (1964) Work and Motivation John Wiley & Sons New York NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McCullough, P.M., Faught, S. Rational Moralists and Moral Rationalists Value-Based Management: Model, Criterion and Validation. J Bus Ethics 60, 195–205 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8317-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8317-x