Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 135–146 | Cite as

The Social Dimension of Organizations: Recent experiences with Great Place to Work® assessment practices

  • Marcel van Marrewijk
Article

Abstract

This paper elaborates on conceptual, empirical and practical arguments why corporations need to focus on their social dimensions, in order to further enhance organizational performance. The paper starts with an introduction on the general trend towards inclusiveness and connectedness. It then elaborates on the phase-wise development of cultures and organizational structures. Managing corporate improvement by building cultures of trust is the central focus of this contribution. By showing the cultural dimensions of Great Places to Work and their workplace practices, worthwhile experiences leading to organizational improvement and superior financial performance are demonstrated.

organizational culture trust Great Place to Work best companies to work for 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, R.: 1998, Liberating the Corporate Soul: Building a Visionary Organization (Butterworth Heinemann).Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, R.: 2000, Building a Values-Driven Organization. (www.corptools.com)Google Scholar
  3. Beck, D. and C. Cowan: 1996, Spiral Dynamics (Black-well Publishers).Google Scholar
  4. Buyens D., and K. De Stobbeleir (in press): The added value of the HR department in difficult times.Google Scholar
  5. Greenleaf, R.: 1973, The Servant as Leader (Newton Center, MA).Google Scholar
  6. Huselid, M. A.: 1995, 'The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity and Corporate Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 38(3), 635–672.Google Scholar
  7. Jaworski, J.: 1996, Synchronicity, the Inner Path of Leadership (Barrett-Koehler Publishers).Google Scholar
  8. Lyman, A.: 2003, Building Trust in the Workplace, Strategic HR Review, Vol. 3, issue 1.Google Scholar
  9. van Marrewijk, M.: 2003, 'Concepts arid Definitions of Corporate Sustainability', Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 95–105.Google Scholar
  10. van Marrewijk, M. and M. Were: 2003, 'Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability', Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 107–119.Google Scholar
  11. van Marrewijk, M. and Hardjono, T. W.: 2003, 'European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Change', Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 121–132.Google Scholar
  12. van Marrewijk, M. and Timmers, J.: 2003, 'Human Capital Management', Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 171–184.Google Scholar
  13. van Marrewijk, M.: 2004, 'A Value Based Approach to Organization Types: Towards a Coherent Set of Stakeholder-Oriented Management Tools', Journal of Business Ethics Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  14. Moskowitz, M. and R. Levering: 2004, 'Europe's 100 Best Workplaces are World-Class', Fortune Magazine.Google Scholar
  15. Moskowitz, M. and R. Levering: 2000, 'A Great Place to Work: What makes some employers so good – and most so bad'.Google Scholar
  16. Moskowitz, M. and R. Levering: 1984, 'The 100 Best Companies to Work for in America'.Google Scholar
  17. Pirsig, R.: 1991, 'Lila, an inquiry into morals', (Steiner, G. A. and Steiner, F. S. (2000) Business).Google Scholar
  18. Quinn, R and K. Cameron: 1999, Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture.Google Scholar
  19. Wilber, K.: 2000, A Theory of Everything: An Integral, Vision for Business, Politics, Science and Spirituality (Shambhala).Google Scholar
  20. Wilber, K.: 1995, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: the Spirit of Evolution (Shambhala).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel van Marrewijk
    • 1
  1. 1.Westplein 5dRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations