Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Protective effect of naturally occurring anti-HER2 autoantibodies on breast cancer

  • Preclinical Study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-HER2-autoantibodies (HER2-AAbs) are found in breast cancer patients as well as healthy individuals. However, the clinical relevance of the antibodies is unknown. We established an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with high sensitivity and quantified serum HER2-AAbs in 100 healthy women, 100 untreated patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 500 untreated patients with invasive breast carcinoma (IBC). The associations between the levels of HER2-AAbs and breast cancer risk, and recurrence-free survival, were examined. High levels of HER2-AAbs were significantly associated with a reduced risk of DCIS (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, P = 4.6 × 10−7) or IBC (OR 0.31, P = 3.7 × 10−7). Subgroup analysis of IBC revealed a stronger association of HER2-AAbs with a reduced risk of the hormone receptor (HR)/HER2+ subtype (OR 0.12) than the other subtypes (HR+/HER2 [OR = 0.32], HR+/HER2+ [OR 0.38], and HR/HER2 [OR 0.29]). When we set the cutoff of HER2-AAbs at 20 ng/mL, recurrence-free survival of HER2-AAb-positive patients (N = 74) was significantly better than that of HER2-AAb-negative patients (N = 426) (P = 0.015). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that HER2-AAbs, as well as histological grade, were independently and significantly (P = 0.0065 and 0.049, respectively) associated with recurrence-free survival. Our exploratory study suggests a protective effect of naturally occurring HER2-AAbs on the development of primary and recurrent breast cancer. Further studies on HER2-AAbs are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parmiani G, De Filippo A, Novellino L, Castelli C (2007) Unique human tumor antigens: immunobiology and use in clinical trials. J Immunol 178:1975–1979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finn O (2008) Cancer immunology. N Engl J Med 358:2704–2715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu H, Goodell V, Disis ML (2008) Humoral immunity directed against tumor-associated antigens as potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of cancer. J Proteome Res 7:1388–1394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman C, Murray A, Chakrabarti J et al (2007) Autoantibodies in breast cancer: their use as an aid to early diagnosis. Ann Oncol 18:868–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Graus F, Dalmou J, Rene R et al (1997) Anti-Hu antibodies in patients with small-cell lung cancer: association with complete response to therapy and improved survival. J Clin Oncol 15:2866–2872

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patton S, Gendler SJ, Spicer AP (1995) The epithelial mucin, MUC1, of milk, mammary gland and other tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta 1241:407–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor-Papadimitriou J, Burchell JM, Plunkett T et al (2002) MUC1 and the immunobiology of cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7:209–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Mensdorff-Pouilly S, Verstraeten AA, Kenemans P et al (2000) Survival in early breast cancer patients is favorably influenced by a natural humoral immune response to polymorphic epithelial mucin. J Clin Oncol 18:574–583

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vesely MD, Kershaw MH, Schreiber RD, Smyth MJ (2011) Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Ann Rev Immunol 29:235–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DiLillo DJ, Yanaba K, Tedder TF (2010) B cells are required for optimal CD4 + and CD8 + T cell tumor immunity: therapeutic B cell depletion enhances B16 melanoma growth in mice. J Immunol 184:4006–4016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Q, Lao X, Pan Q et al (2011) Adoptive transfer of tumor reactive B cells confers host T-cell immunity and tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res 17:4987–4995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Carmi Y, Spitzer MH, Linde IL et al (2015) Allogeneic IgG combined with dendritic cell stimuli induce antitumour T-cell immunity. Nature 521:99–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hudis CA (2007) Trastuzumab—mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 357:39–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Disis ML, Pupa SM, Gralow JR et al (1997) High-titer HER-2/neu protein-specific antibody can be detected in patients with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:3363–3367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lauterlein JJL, Petersen ER, Olsen DA et al (2011) Quantification of HER2 autoantibodies in the amplification phenomenon of HER2 in breast cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:877–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2003) Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3357–3365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD et al (2005) Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005. Ann Oncol 16:1569–1583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD et al (2007) Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007. Ann Oncol 18:1133–1144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD et al (2009) Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol 20:1319–1329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Morimoto K, Kim SJ, Tanei T et al (2009) Stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive breast cancers are characterized by negative estrogen receptor, positive human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2, and high Ki67 expression. Cancer Sci 100:1062–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodell V, Disis ML (2005) Human tumor cell lysates as a protein source for the detection of cancer antigen-specific humoral immunity. J Immunol Methods 299:129–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery RB, Makary E, Schiffman K et al (2005) Endogenous anti-HER2 antibodies block HER2 phosphorylation and signaling through extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Cancer Res 65:650–656

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paik S, Kim C, Wolmark N (2008) HER2 status and benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358:1409–1411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perez EA, Reinholz MM, Hillman DW et al (2010) HER2 and chromosome 17 effect on patient outcome in the N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial. J Clin Oncol 28:4307–4315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ithimakin S, Day KC, Malik F et al (2013) HER2 drives luminal breast cancer stem cells in the absence of HER2 amplification: implications for efficacy of adjuvant trastuzumab. Cancer Res 73:1635–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Pogue-Geile KL, Kim C, Jeong JH et al (2013) Predicting degree of benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in NSABP Trial B-31. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1782–1788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Milani A, Sangiolo D, Aglietta M, Valabrega G (2014) Recent advances in the development of breast cancer vaccines. Breast Cancer 6:159–168

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mittendorf EA, Clifton GT, Holmes JP et al (2014) Final report of the phase I/II clinical trial of the E75 (nelipepimut-S) vaccine with booster inoculations to prevent disease recurrence in high-risk breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 25:1735–1742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported, in part, by a research grant from AstraZeneca (Grant ID: 201500400) and Novartis Pharma. We are grateful to Dr. Junichiro Ikeda and Dr. Tsutomu Kasugai for a help with the pathological evaluations. We thank Dr. Yoshiaki Sota for valuable comments on the statistical analyses and Dr. Koji Morimoto for administrative works.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masafumi Shimoda.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Masafumi Shimoda has received research grants from AstraZeneca. Shinzaburo Noguchi received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, and has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis Pharma, and Chugai Pharmaceutical.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10549_2016_3801_MOESM1_ESM.eps

Supplementary material 1 (EPS 931 kb) Supplementary Fig. S1 Evaluation of serum backgrounds. Absorbance at 450 nm (A450) of patient serum samples loaded on both wells coated with HER2-ECD and wells left uncoated. (a) Comparison of absorbance of coated wells (Coated) with absorbance of uncoated wells (Uncoated). (b) The concentrations of HER2-AAbs in each serum was calculated using only A450 of coated wells (Coated), and using A450 of coated wells from which A450 of uncoated wells were subtracted (Coated–Uncoated). Two values from each sample were compared in order to evaluate the effect of serum backgrounds

10549_2016_3801_MOESM2_ESM.eps

Supplementary material 2 (EPS 760 kb) Supplementary Fig. S2 Spike-in test. A450 of trastuzumab serially diluted with fetal bovine serum (FBS) or with human serum containing a low level of HER2-AAbs are shown

10549_2016_3801_MOESM3_ESM.eps

Supplementary material 3 (EPS 789 kb) Supplementary Fig. S3 Competition assay. Influence of HER2-ECD preincubation with serum samples from two patients on the ELISA signals was evaluated

Supplementary material 4 (DOC 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabuchi, Y., Shimoda, M., Kagara, N. et al. Protective effect of naturally occurring anti-HER2 autoantibodies on breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157, 55–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3801-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3801-4

Keywords

Navigation