The reciprocal association between mammographic breast density, hyaluronan synthesis and patient outcome
- 246 Downloads
Low mammographic breast density (MBD) and increased hyaluronan (HA) synthesis have been shown to have adverse effects on breast cancer prognosis. We aimed at elucidating the background of risk associated with mammographic characteristics, MBD and HA and its synthesizing isoforms in an attempt to uncover potential underlying biological mechanisms. MBD and mammographic characteristics of 270 patients were classified according to percentile density (very low density VLD, ≤25 %; mixed density MID, >25 %) and the BI-RADS 5th edition lexicon. Breast density and mammographic features were correlated with the localization and expression of HA, CD44, and HAS1-3 isoforms, and their combined effect on patients’ survivals was explored. VLD showed an increased level of HA-positive carcinoma cells and stromal HA, HAS2, and HAS3. Tumors presenting as masses had more HA-positive carcinoma cells and more stromal HAS2 and HAS3. Indistinct margin tumors showed more stromal HA and HAS3. Patients who combined both VLD breasts with either high HA in carcinoma cells or stroma showed a worse prognosis compared to low levels (carcinoma cells 58.0 vs. 80.5 %, p = 0.001; stroma 64.2 vs. 79.6 %, p = 0.017), while no similar HA-related effect was observed in MID breasts. Our findings suggest a strong reciprocal relationship between low MBD and HA expression and synthesis. The expression of both factors simultaneously leads to an especially adverse prognostic effect which might have an impact on treatment decision in the future. Moreover, HA around cancer cells may inhibit chemotherapy agents and antibody treatments from reaching cancer cells.
KeywordsBreast cancer Hyaluronan Hyaluronan synthases Mammography Breast density
List of Abbreviations
Mammographic breast density
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
Very low density
Financial support was received from Kuopio University Hospital-VTR funds (MT, PA, RV, RT), EVO funding (Grant Nos. 5063525, 5063532) (AM, RV, AS), the University of Kuopio Foundation (AM), grants from Mauri and Sirkka Wiljasalo (AM) and the Paavo Koskinen foundation (AM), Spearhed Funds of the University of Eastern Finland (Cancer Center of Eastern Finland) (RV, PA, VMK, AM), Sigrid Juselius Foundation (RT, MT), and Cancer societies of Finland (RV, AM, MS). Authors are thankful for Tuomas Selander for kindly providing statistical advice for this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of Interest
MT received travel imbursement and an honorarium for a lecture at Halozyme Inc., San Diego, CA. The remaining authors declare that they have no other potential competing interests.
- 16.Sickles EA, D’Orsi CJ, Bassett LW et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® mammography. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, RestonGoogle Scholar