Estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in invasive breast cancer: a 3,198 cases study at National Cancer Center, China
- 472 Downloads
Smears from paraffin sections from 3,198 cases of surgical resection mammary carcinomas were assessed immunohistochemically for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressions in National Cancer Center (NCC), China, to explore the correlation of these markers to each other, to tumor histologic subtype, and to explore breast cancer four molecular subtypes clinicopathological characteristics. Pathology material of surgical resection patients presenting to NCC during July 1, 2010–July 1, 2012 were reviewed for patients’ age, tumor size, subtype, grade, and ER, PR, HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) status. For HER2 IHC 2+ score cases, fluorescence in situ hybridization was used, as the 2007 American society of clinical oncology/college of American pathologists guidelines. There were 3,198 cases, with a median age of 51 years, a mean tumor size of 2.1 cm, and 42.3 % lymph node positivity. Of all cases, 2,506 (78.4 %) were ER+, 2,548 (79.7 %) were PR+, and 816 (25.5 %) were HER2+. Among the four molecular subtypes of breast cancer, luminal A were the majority accounting for 65.3 %, and triple-negative breast cancer accounted for 9.2 %. ER, PR, and HER2 status showed a direct correlation to tumor onset age, tumor type, and grade of ductal carcinoma. Meanwhile the four subtypes of breast cancer differed from onset age, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and tumor grade. This study was an important documentation of Chinese breast cancer patients and the report would serve as a baseline for other future studies.
KeywordsBreast cancer Estrogen receptor Progesterone receptor Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 China
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
- 4.Raji A, Lurie RH (2007) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing recommendation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131(9):1330–1331; author reply 1331–1333Google Scholar
- 8.Parise CA, Bauer KR, Brown MM, Caggiano V (2009) Breast cancer subtypes as defined by the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) among women with invasive breast cancer in California, 1999–2004. Breast J 15(6):593–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Althuis MD, Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M, Brinton LA, Madigan MP, Sherman ME (2004) Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(10):1558–1568Google Scholar
- 15.Singh JC, Jhaveri K, Esteva FJ (2014) HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: optimizing patient outcomes and opportunities for drug development. Br J Cancer Google Scholar
- 18.Cui Y, Deming-Halverson SL, Shrubsole MJ, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Fair AM, Sanderson M, Shu XO, Kelley MC, Zheng W (2014) Associations of hormone-related factors with breast cancer risk according to hormone receptor status among white and african american women. Clin Breast CancerGoogle Scholar
- 19.Zell JA, Tsang WY, Taylor TH, Mehta RS, Anton-Culver H (2009) Prognostic impact of human epidermal growth factor-like receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): analysis of 2,014 IBC patient cases from the California Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res 11(1):R9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(19):10869–10874PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Abramson VG, Lehmann BD, Ballinger TJ, Pietenpol JA (2014) Subtyping of triple-negative breast cancer: implications for therapy. CancerGoogle Scholar