Randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with and without carboplatin followed by cyclophosphamide/epirubicin/5-fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/IIIA breast cancer without HER2 overexpression
- 1.1k Downloads
Addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer may improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) followed by cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (CEF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer. Patients with stage II/IIIA HER2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to preoperatively receive CP-CEF (four 3-week cycles of carboplatin [area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min, day 1] and wPTX [80 mg/m2, day 1, 8, 15] followed by four 3-week cycles of CEF [500/100/500 mg/m2] or P-CEF (four cycles of wPTX followed by four cycles of CEF). The primary objective was pCR rate. Of 181 eligible patients, 89 were randomly assigned to the CP-CEF and 92 to the P-CEF. Two patients in each arm refused to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall 88 patients in the CP-CEF and 91 patients in the P-CEF were assessable for efficacy and safety. The pCR rate in the CP-CEF was significantly higher than that in the P-CEF (31.8 vs. 17.6 %, one-sided P = 0.01). Among patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the pCR rate in the CP-CEF was significantly higher than that in the P-CEF [61.2 (23/37) vs. 26.3 % (10/38), P = 0.003]. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in the CP-CEF more frequently than in the P-CEF (65.9 vs. 38.5 %). Adding carboplatin to neoadjuvant wPTX followed by CEF for HER2-negative breast cancer improved the pCR rate and exacerbated hematotoxicity.
KeywordsBreast cancer Carboplatin HER2 negative Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
We thank the women who participated in this trial; Hitoshi Tsuda, Futoshi Akiyama, and Shinobu Masuda for central review of pathological diagnoses; Hiroi Kasai for preparing for this study; and Midori Tanaka for writing the study report. This study had been performed as a registration-directed trial in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guideline [Enforcement Regulation No. 24 of the MHLW (revised GCP) dated on February 29, 2008], which is published by the revised Pharmaceutical Affairs Act in Japan (No. 84 dated on June 21, 2006). This study was supported by the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants (Clinical Cancer Research), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (Grant Number: MHLW, 2009 Clinical Cancer Research General-020) and the Cancer Research and Development grants, and National Cancer Center (Grant Number: 2011-A-42).
Conflicts of interest
MA has declared conflicts related to lecture fees form Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. SO has declared conflicts related to lecture fees from Astra Zeneca K. K., Novartis Pharma K. K., and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. YF has declared conflicts related to conducting research sponsored by Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Glaxo Smith Kline K. K., Sanofi-Aventis K. K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Bio Development Center Limited, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K. K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K., and Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and remunerations from Astra Zeneca K. K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Glaxo Smith Kline K. K., Sanofi-Aventis K. K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K. K., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Novartis Pharma K. K., and Bristol-Myers Squibb K. K. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A et al (2003) The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol 21:4165–4174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V et al (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomized controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER-negative cohort. Lancet 375:377–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Earl HM, Vallier AL, Hiller L et al (2014) Effects of the addition of gemcitabine, and paclitaxel-first sequencing, in neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel for woman with high-risk early breast cancer (Neo-tAnGo): an open-label, 2 × 2 factorial randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:201–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Dimopoulos MA et al (2009) A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first-line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:87–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sikow WM, Berry DA, Perou CM et al (2013) Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel followed by dose-dense AC on pathologic complete response rates in triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB/Alliance 40603. In: 36th annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract S5-01Google Scholar