Surgical management of breast cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2.5k Downloads
This meta-analysis investigates the oncological safety of breast-conserving therapy BCT in BRCA-mutation carriers and the risk for contralateral breast cancer (CBC) compared with non-carriers, potential risk factors for ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR) or CBC and grades these factors based on the level of evidence. A PubMed search was conducted through April 2013 to identify studies that described the risk for IBR and CBC after BCT in BRCA-mutation carriers versus non-carriers as well as studies that investigated risk factors for IBR and CBC in BRCA-mutation carriers. Results were summarized using meta-analysis when sufficient studies were available. Ten studies investigated the oncological safety of BCT in BRCA-mutation carriers versus non-carriers. There was no significant difference in IBR between carriers and controls (RR 1.45, 95 % CI 0.98–2.14). However, a significant higher risk for IBR in BRCA-mutation carriers was observed in studies with a median follow-up ≥7 years (RR 1.51, 95 % CI 1.15–1.98). CBCs were significantly greater in carriers versus controls (RR 3.56, 95 % CI 2.50–5.08). Use of adjuvant chemotherapy and oophorectomy were associated with a significantly lower risk for IBR in BRCA-mutation carriers. Three factors were associated with a lower risk for CBC in BRCA-mutation carriers: oophorectomy, use of tamoxifen, and age at first breast cancer. Based on current evidence, the use of BCT in BRCA-mutation carriers can be considered a reasonable option since it does not seem to increase the risk for IBR. However, several aspects should be taken into account before the final decision-making.
KeywordsBRCA Breast cancer Breast-conserving therapy Meta-analysis
This study has been funded by the Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 3.Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Smith TE, Lee D, Turner BC, Carter D, Haffty BG (2000) True recurrence vs. new primary ipsilateral breast tumor relapse: an analysis of clinical and pathologic differences and their implications in natural history, prognoses, and therapeutic management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48:1281–1289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.van der Kolk DM, de Bock GH, Leegte BK, Schaapveld M, Mourits MJ, de Vries J, van der Hout AH, Oosterwijk JC (2010) Penetrance of breast cancer, ovarian cancer and contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 families: high cancer incidence at older age. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:643–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.van Sprundel TC, Schmidt MK, Rookus MA, Brohet R, van Asperen CJ, Rutgers EJ, Van’t Veer LJ, Tollenaar RA (2005) Risk reduction of contralateral breast cancer and survival after contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 93:287–292PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Heemskerk-Gerritsen B, Hooning M, van Asperen CJ et al (2013) Efficacy of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) on overall survival (OS) in BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer (BC) patients. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 31(15 suppl):1502Google Scholar
- 37.Fourquet A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kirova YM, Sigal-Zafrani B, Asselain B, Institut Curie Breast Cancer Study Group, Institut Curie Breast Ovary Cancer Risk Study Group (2009) Familial breast cancer: clinical response to induction chemotherapy or radiotherapy related to BRCA1/2 mutations status. Am J Clin Oncol 32:127–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Unukovych D, Sandelin K, Liljegren A, Arver B, Wickman M, Johansson H, Brandberg Y (2012) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients with a family history: a prospective 2-years follow-up study of health related quality of life, sexuality and body image. Eur J Cancer 48:3150–3156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar