Knowledge and perceptions of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer risk in adolescent girls
- 441 Downloads
Evidence suggests early events might modify adult breast cancer risk and many adolescents learn of familial and genetic risks for breast cancer. Little is known about how adolescent girls understand and respond to breast cancer risk. Semi-structured interviews with 11–19 year-old girls at high-risk and population-risk for breast cancer evaluated knowledge and perceptions of breast cancer risk and risk modification. Framework analysis and descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze open-ended responses. Risk group and age differences were evaluated by Fisher’s exact and McNemar’s tests. Fifty-four girls (86 % of invited), 35 high-risk (65 %), and 19 population-risk (35 %) completed interviews. The most frequently reported risk for breast cancer was family history/hereditary predisposition (66 %). Only 17 % of girls were aware of BRCA1/2 genes. The majority (76 %) of high-risk girls perceive themselves to be at increased risk for breast cancer, compared to 22 % of population-risk girls (p = 0.001). Half of girls reported that women can get breast cancer before 20-years-old. The majority believe there are things women (70 %) and girls (67 %) can do to prevent breast cancer. Mother was the most frequently reported source of information for breast cancer among both high-risk (97 %) and population-risk (89 %) girls. In this study, many high-risk girls perceive themselves to be at increased risk for breast cancer, and many girls believe that breast cancer can occur in teens. Yet, most girls believe there are things women and girls can do to prevent breast cancer. Research evaluating the impact of awareness and perceptions of breast cancer risk on psychosocial, health, and risk behaviors is needed to develop strategies to optimize responses to cancer risk.
KeywordsAdolescents Breast cancer Breast cancer prevention Cancer risk assessment Perceived risk of cancer
American Cancer Society, Mentored Research Scholar Award (MRSG 07-014-01-CPPB). Support was also provided by NIH grant P30 CA006927 and the Fox Chase Cancer Center Keystone Program in Personalized Risk and Prevention.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2010) Cancer facts & figures. Available from http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-026238.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2011
- 5.NCCN Guidelines, version 1. (2012) Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
- 20.Bradbury AR et al. (2012) When parents disclose BRCA1/2 test results: their communication and perceptions of offspring response. Cancer 118(13):3417–3425Google Scholar
- 21.The early act. Available from http://wassermanschultz.house.gov/earlyact/index.shtml. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
- 22.Phillips L, Susan G (2009) Komen tour bus takes awareness on the go. http://www.collegiatetimes.com/stories/14224/susan-g.-komen-tour-bus-takes-awareness-on-the-go. Accessed 3 Oct 2012
- 23.Orenstein P (2010) The way we live now; think about pink. The New York Times Magazine (12 Nov 2010) p 13–14Google Scholar
- 27.Weiss M et al. (2009) Breast cancer fear in girls: a major “side effect” of breast cancer in loved ones and a backlash of ubiquitous media coverage. Cancer Res 69(2). doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS-5078
- 30.Geller G et al. (2000) Mothers and daughters from breast cancer families: a qualitative study of their perceptions of risks and benefits associated with minor’s participation in genetic susceptibility research. J Am Med Womens Assoc 55 (5): 280–284, 293Google Scholar
- 34.Leventhal H et al. (1997). In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA (eds) Perceptions of health and illness: current research and applications, in illness representations: theoretical foundations. Harwood: Amsterdam, pp 19–46Google Scholar
- 43.Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994). In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, pp 173–194Google Scholar
- 47.Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 50.Crabtree BF, Miller WL (1992) Doing qualitative research. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 51.Braet C et al. (2012) Depression in early, middle and late adolescence: differential evidence for the cognitive diathesis-stress model. Clin Psychol Psychother (in press)Google Scholar
- 57.Bosland K, McCarthy K (2009) 11-Year-old breast cancer survivor. Available from: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/11-year-youngest-breast-cancer-survivors/story?id=8782697#.Tt_fi3qt0tU. Accessed 9 Oct 2009
- 62.Emanuel EJ et al (2008) The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar