Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in early-stage breast cancer

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neutropenia is one of the most important dose-limiting toxicities and often the reason for dose reduction. In this study we aimed to assess whether chemotherapy-induced neutropenia could be a marker of efficacy and associate with increased survival. Data from a retrospective survey for early breast cancer patients in our hospital were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-five patients who had been treated with six cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) were studied. The association between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and overall survival (OS) was assessed. According to a multivariate Cox model with time-varying covariates, hazard ratios of death were 0.434 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.298–0.634; P < 0.001) for patients with mild neutropenia, and 0.640 (95% CI, 0.42–0.975; P = 0.038) for those with severe neutropenia. Neutropenia occurring in early breast cancer patients is an independent predictor of increased survival. These findings suggest that neutropenia in patients who receive chemotherapy is strongly associated with a better prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N, Pusztai L, Nitz U, Harbeck N (2009) Triple-negative breast cancer—current status and future directions. Ann Oncol 20:1913–1927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (1998) Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 352:930–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717

  4. Martin M, Villar A, Sole-Calvo A, Gonzalez R, Massuti B, Lizon J, Camps C, Carrato A, Casado A, Candel MT, Albanell J, Aranda J, Munarriz B, Campbell J, Diaz-Rubio E (2003) Doxorubicin in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. FAC regimen, day 1, 21) versus methotrexate in combination with fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide (i.v. CMF regimen, day 1, 21) as adjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer: a study by the GEICAM group. Ann Oncol 14:833–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Maio M, Gridelli C, Gallo C, Shepherd F, Piantedosi FV, Cigolari S, Manzione L, Illiano A, Barbera S, Robbiati SF, Frontini L, Piazza E, Ianniello GP, Veltri E, Castiglione F, Rosetti F, Gebbia V, Seymour L, Chiodini P, Perrone F (2005) Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and treatment efficacy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of three randomised trials. Lancet Oncol 6:669–677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamanaka T, Matsumoto S, Teramukai S, Ishiwata R, Nagai Y, Fukushima M (2007) Predictive value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia for the efficacy of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in advanced gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer 97:37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shitara K, Matsuo K, Takahari D, Yokota T, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y, Najima M, Ura T, Muro K (2009) Neutropaenia as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with first-line FOLFOX. Eur J Cancer 45:1757–1763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saarto T, Blomqvist C, Rissanen P, Auvinen A, Elomaa I (1997) Haematological toxicity: a marker of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in stage II and III breast cancer. Br J Cancer 75:301–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poikonen P, Saarto T, Lundin J, Joensuu H, Blomqvist C (1999) Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF. Br J Cancer 80:1763–1766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron DA, Massie C, Kerr G, Leonard RC (2003) Moderate neutropenia with adjuvant CMF confers improved survival in early breast cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1837–1842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishitobi M, Komoike Y, Motomura K, Koyama H, and Inaji H Prognostic significance of neutropenia on day one of anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Oncology 78:213–219

  12. Le Doussal V, Tubiana-Hulin M, Friedman S, Hacene K, Spyratos F, Brunet M (1989) Prognostic value of histologic grade nuclear components of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR). An improved score modification based on a multivariate analysis of 1262 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer 64:1914–1921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J, Pawlicki M, Guastalla JP, Weaver C, Tomiak E, Al-Tweigeri T, Chap L, Juhos E, Guevin R, Howell A, Fornander T, Hainsworth J, Coleman R, Vinholes J, Modiano M, Pinter T, Tang SC, Colwell B, Prady C, Provencher L, Walde D, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Hugh J, Loret C, Rupin M, Blitz S, Jacobs P, Murawsky M, Riva A, Vogel C (2005) Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2302–2313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trudeau M, Charbonneau F, Gelmon K, Laing K, Latreille J, Mackey J, McLeod D, Pritchard K, Provencher L, Verma S (2005) Selection of adjuvant chemotherapy for treatment of node-positive breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6:886–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pettengell R, Schwenkglenks M, Leonard R, Bosly A, Paridaens R, Constenla M, Szucs TD, Jackisch C (2008) Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study. Support Care Cancer 16:1299–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Crawford J, Dale DC, Lyman GH (2004) Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management. Cancer 100:228–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kvinnsland S (1999) The leucocyte nadir, a predictor of chemotherapy efficacy? Br J Cancer 80:1681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayers C, Panzarella T, Tannock IF (2001) Analysis of the prognostic effects of inclusion in a clinical trial and of myelosuppression on survival after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer 91:2246–2257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakata B, Tsuji A, Mitachi Y, Yamamitsu S, Hirata K, Takeuchi T, Shirasaka T, Hirakawa K (2006) Moderate neutropenia with S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin may predict a more favourable prognosis in advanced gastric cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 18:678–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fumoleau P, Devaux Y, Vo Van ML, Kerbrat P, Fargeot P, Schraub S, Mihura J, Namer M, Mercier M (1993) Premenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing 3 adjuvant regimens: FEC 50 × 6 cycles vs FEC 50 × 3 cycles vs FEC 75 × 3 cycles. The French Adjuvant Study Group. Drugs 45(Suppl 2):38–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wood WC, Budman DR, Korzun AH, Cooper MR, Younger J, Hart RD, Moore A, Ellerton JA, Norton L, Ferree CR et al (1994) Dose and dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II, node-positive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 330:1253–1259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher B, Anderson S, Wickerham DL, DeCillis A, Dimitrov N, Mamounas E, Wolmark N, Pugh R, Atkins JN, Meyers FJ, Abramson N, Wolter J, Bornstein RS, Levy L, Romond EH, Caggiano V, Grimaldi M, Jochimsen P, Deckers P (1997) Increased intensification and total dose of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-22. J Clin Oncol 15:1858–1869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bergh J, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Lidbrink E, Lindman H, Malmstrom P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Bengtsson NO, Soderlund G, Anker G, Wist E, Ottosson S, Salminen E, Ljungman P, Holte H, Nilsson J, Blomqvist C, Wilking N (2000) Tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide compared with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: a randomised trial. Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study. Lancet 356:1384–1391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gurney H (1996) Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. J Clin Oncol 14:2590–2611

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurney H (2002) How to calculate the dose of chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 86:1297–1302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ratain MJ (1998) Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? J Clin Oncol 16:2297–2298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Newell DR (2002) Getting the right dose in cancer chemotherapy–time to stop using surface area? Br J Cancer 86:1207–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. de Jongh FE, Verweij J, Loos WJ, de Wit R, de Jonge MJ, Planting AS, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2001) Body-surface area-based dosing does not increase accuracy of predicting cisplatin exposure. J Clin Oncol 19:3733–3739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh S, Parulekar W, Murray N, Feld R, Evans WK, Tu D, Shepherd FA (2005) Influence of sex on toxicity and treatment outcome in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Edlund P, Ahlgren J, Bjerre K, Andersson M, Bergh J, Mouridsen H, Holmberg S B, Bengtsson N O, Jakobsen E, Moller S, Lindman H, and Blomqvist C Dose-tailoring of FEC adjuvant chemotherapy based on leukopenia is feasible and well tolerated. Toxicity and dose intensity in the Scandinavian Breast Group phase 3 adjuvant Trial SBG 2000-1. Acta Oncol 50:329–337

  31. Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, Ingle JN, Cooper MR, Hayes DF, Tkaczuk KH, Fleming G, Holland JF, Duggan DB, Carpenter JT, Frei E 3rd, Schilsky RL, Wood WC, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:976–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JH, Grochow LB, Sparreboom A (2002) Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–2001. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1883–1888

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gurney H (2006) Developing a new framework for dose calculation. J Clin Oncol 24:1489–1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gurney HP, Ackland S, Gebski V, Farrell G (1998) Factors affecting epirubicin pharmacokinetics and toxicity: evidence against using body-surface area for dose calculation. J Clin Oncol 16:2299–2304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandstrom M, Freijs A, Larsson R, Nygren P, Fjallskog ML, Bergh J, Karlsson MO (1996) Lack of relationship between systemic exposure for the component drug of the fluorouracil, epirubicin, and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide regimen in breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 14:1581–1588

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sandstrom M, Lindman H, Nygren P, Johansson M, Bergh J, Karlsson MO (2006) Population analysis of the pharmacokinetics and the haematological toxicity of the fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen in breast cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58:143–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Crawford J (2003) Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices. J Clin Oncol 21:4524–4531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lyman GH, Dale DC, Friedberg J, Crawford J, Fisher RI (2004) Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a nationwide study. J Clin Oncol 22:4302–4311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Leonard RC, Miles D, Thomas R, Nussey F (2003) Impact of neutropenia on delivering planned adjuvant chemotherapy: UK audit of primary breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 89:2062–2068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by The Science Technology Development Project of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin [20090139] and Talented Professionals Scientific Research Funds of Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. The authors would like to thank Yue Li, Hongmeng Zhao, Yanqun Song for their help with data collecting.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any competing interest to declare. The authors have no relevant financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, Y., Yu, Z., Wen, S. et al. Prognostic value of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131, 483–490 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1799-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1799-1

Keywords

Navigation