Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility of two dose-dense FEC regimens with growth factor support for adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer: results from a randomised study of the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG)

  • Clinical Trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Addition of epirubicin to adjuvant chemotherapy can provide important benefits for patients with early breast cancer, but the optimal dose remains unclear. Further improvements can be achieved with dose-dense regimens, but densification of fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) has proved difficult, with FEC60 providing little benefit over standard chemotherapy and FEC100 associated with toxicity. We investigated the feasibility of two intermediate dose-dense FEC regimens. Patients were randomised to six cycles of FEC75 or FEC90, with all three drugs given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Patients also received pegfilgrastim 6 mg as a single subcutaneous injection on day 2 of each cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects receiving ≥85% relative dose intensity and was achieved by 96% and 88% of patients in the FEC75 and FEC90 arms, respectively. Of 147 FEC75 infusions, 4.1% were delayed, while 9.8% of 143 FEC90 infusions were delayed. The most common reasons for delay were adverse events and personal/logistical reasons. One dose reduction occurred during the study (FEC90), related to diarrhoea. Grade 3–4 haematological toxicities were reported in two patients in the FEC90 arm. There were no incidences of febrile neutropenia during the study. The most common adverse events were increases in liver enzymes and gastrointestinal events; no event resulted in discontinuation. Only one patient (FEC90) experienced serious adverse events (vomiting and throat oedema). In conclusion, dose-dense FEC75 and FEC90 are feasible with pegfilgrastim support. These regimens are associated with a very low risk of Grade 3–4 toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2006) United States cancer statistics. 2003 incidence and mortality. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P (2007) Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 18:581–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Levine MN, Bramwell VH, Pritchard KI, Norris BD, Shepherd LE, Abu-Zahra H, Findlay B, Warr D, Bowman D, Myles J, Arnold A, Vandenberg T, MacKenzie R, Robert J, Ottaway J, Burnell M, Williams CK, Tu D (1998) Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 16:2651–2658

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. French Adjuvant Study Group (2001) Benefit of a high-dose epirubicin regimen in adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer patients with poor prognostic factors: 5-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 19:602–611

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonneterre J, Roché H, Kerbrat P, Brémond A, Fumoleau P, Namer M, Goudier MJ, Schraub S, Fargeot P, Chapelle-Marcillac I (2005) Epirubicin increases long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis, node-positive, early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of the French Adjuvant Study Group 05 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:2686–2693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Norton L, Simon R (1977) Tumor size, sensitivity to therapy, and design of treatment schedules. Cancer Treat Rep 61:1307–1317

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Norton L (1997) Evolving concepts in the systemic drug therapy of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 24:S10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kahan Z, Uhercsak G, Hajnal-Papp R, Boda K, Thurzo L (2005) Dose-dense sequential adriamycin-Paclitaxel-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy is well tolerated and safe in high-risk early breast cancer. Oncology 68:446–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C, Hudis C, Winer EP, Gradishar WJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Livingston R, Ingle JN, Perez EA, Carpenter J, Hurd D, Holland JF, Smith BL, Sartor CI, Leung EH, Abrams J, Schilsky RL, Muss HB, Norton L (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21:1431–1439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Venturini M, Del Mastro L, Aitini E, Baldini E, Caroti C, Contu A, Testore F, Brema F, Pronzato P, Cavazzini G, Sertoli MR, Canavese G, Rosso R, Bruzzi P (2005) Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1724–1733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldini E, Gardin G, Giannessi PG, Evangelista G, Roncella M, Prochilo T, Collecchi P, Rosso R, Lionetto R, Bruzzi P, Mosca F, Conte PF (2003) Accelerated versus standard cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil: a randomized phase III trial in locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 14:227–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dang CT, D’Andrea GM, Moynahan ME, Dickler MN, Seidman AD, Fornier M, Robson ME, Theodoulou M, Lake D, Currie VE, Hurria A, Panageas KS, Norton L, Hudis CA (2004) Phase II study of feasibility of dose-dense FEC followed by alternating weekly taxanes in high-risk, four or more node-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 10:5754–5761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (1999) Common terminology criteria for adverse events index. Version 2.0. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fumoleau P, Brain E, Delozier T, Asselain B, Serin D, Roche H, Spielmann M, Geneve J, Jimenez M, Bonnetain F (2005) Adjuvant dose-dense (3 FEC 100 followed by 3 docetaxel every 2 weeks) regimen is not feasible. Results of FNCLCC-PACS 06 study. Poster presented at the 28th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 8–11 December 2005

  17. Schwartz J, Domchek SM, Hwang WT, Fox K (2005) Evaluation of anemia, neutropenia and skin toxicities in standard or dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC)-paclitaxel or docetaxel adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Ann Oncol 16:247–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnell M, Levine M, Chapman JA, Bramwell V, Gelmon K, Walley B, Whelan T, Albain K, Perez E, Rugo H, Ding Z, O’Brien P, Shepherd L, Pritchard K (2006) A randomized trial of CEF versus dose dense EC followed by paclitaxel versus AC followed by paclitaxel in women with node positive or high risk node negative breast cancer, NCIC CTG MA.21: Results of an interim analysis. Poster presented at the 29th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, 14–17 December 2006

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study and manuscript were supported by an unrestricted grant from Amgen (Europe) GmbH. Editorial support was provided by Dr. Daniel Booth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Brodowicz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kahán, Z., Spanik, S., Wagnerova, M. et al. Feasibility of two dose-dense FEC regimens with growth factor support for adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer: results from a randomised study of the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG). Breast Cancer Res Treat 112, 557–563 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9894-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9894-7

Keywords

Navigation