Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses’ Health Study

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mammographic density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer; however the mechanism that underlies this association is unclear. We hypothesized that measures of energy balance early in life and in adulthood may be associated with mammographic density. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1,398 women in the Nurses’ Health Study to examine associations between physical activity, childhood and current body fatness, weight gain from age 18 years to present and mammographic density. Percent mammographic density was measured from digitized mammograms by a computer-assisted method. Demographic and lifestyle data were obtained from prospectively collected questionnaires. For all analyses, subjects were stratified into three groups: premenopausal women, postmenopausal women not currently taking hormones, and postmenopausal women currently taking hormones. Childhood body fatness was inversely associated with mammographic density. The correlations ranged from −0.15 to −0.19 in the three strata of women (P ≤ 0.001). The difference in mean percent mammographic density between the leanest and heaviest body types ranged from 6.2 to 9.9%. Similarly, adult body fatness was inversely associated with percent mammographic density. The correlations ranged from −0.41 to −0.48 in the three strata of women (P < 0.0001). The difference in mean percent mammographic density between the leanest and heaviest body types ranged from 22.3 to 35.1%. Weight gain from age 18 was also inversely associated with mammographic density. There was no association between recent physical activity and mammographic density. These findings indicate that childhood and adult body fatness and weight change from age 18 are inversely associated with mammographic density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, Hoover R, Haile R (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1622–1629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, Lee V, Hopper JL, Yaffe MJ, Paterson AD (2005) Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6:798–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL (2001) Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis. IARC Sci Publ 154:163–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Warner E, Lockwood G, Tritchler D, Boyd NF (1992) The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev 16:67–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colditz GA, Feskanich D, Chen WY, Hunter DJ, Willett WC (2003) Physical activity and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer 89:847–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McTiernan A, Kooperberg C, White E, Wilcox S, Coates R, Adams-Campbell LL, Woods N, Ockene J (2003) Recreational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Cohort Study. JAMA 290:1331–1336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel AV, Callel EE, Bernstein L, Wu AH, Thun MJ (2003) Recreational physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in a large cohort of US women. Cancer Causes Control 14:519–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rockhill B, Willett WC, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA (1999) A prospective study of recreational physical activity and breast cancer risk. Arch Intern Med 159:2290–2296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumitrescu RG, Cotarla I (2005) Understanding breast cancer risk—where do we stand in 2005? J Cell Mol Med 9:208–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, Fraser G, Goldbohm RA, Graham S, Kushi L, Marshall JR, Miller AB, Rohan T, Smith-Warner SA, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Wolk A, Hunter DJ (2000) Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 152:514–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleary MP, Maihle NJ (1997) The role of body mass index in the relative risk of developing premenopausal versus postmenopausal breast cancer. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 216:28–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baer HJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Michels KB, Rich-Edwards JW, Hunter DJ, Willett WC (2005) Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and incidence of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 7:R314–R325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkey CS, Frazier AL, Gardner JD, Colditz GA (1999) Adolescence and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 85:2400–2409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weiderpass E, Braaten T, Magnusson C, Kumle M, Vainio H, Lund E, Adami HO (2004) A prospective study of body size in different periods of life and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1121–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnes-Josiah D, Potter JD, Sellers TA, Himes JH (1995) Early body size and subsequent weight gain as predictors of breast cancer incidence (Iowa, United States). Cancer Causes Control 6:112–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van den Brandt PA, Dirx MJ, Ronckers CM, van den Hoogen P, Goldbohm RA (1997) Height, weight, weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control 8:39–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC (1997) Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA 278:1407–1411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morimoto LM, White E, Chen Z, Chlebowski RT, Hays J, Kuller L, Lopez AM, Manson J, Margolis KL, Muti PC, Stefanick ML, McTiernan A (2002) Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women’s Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control 13:741–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Olsson H, Berglund G (2003) A prospective study of adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Int J Cancer 103:246–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Feigelson HS, Jonas CR, Teras LR, Thun MJ, Calle EE (2004) Weight gain, body mass index, hormone replacement therapy, and postmenopausal breast cancer in a large prospective study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:220–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lahmann PH, Schulz M, Hoffmann K, Boeing H, Tjonneland A, Olsen A, Overvad K, Key TJ, Allen NE, Khaw KT, Bingham S, Berglund G, Wirfalt E, Berrino F, Krogh V, Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Kaaks R, Riboli E (2005) Long-term weight change and breast cancer risk: the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). Br J Cancer 93:582–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parker ED, Folsom AR (2003) Intentional weight loss and incidence of obesity-related cancers: the Iowa Women’s Health Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27:1447–1452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Colditz GA, Hankinson SE (2005) The Nurses’ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women. Nat Rev Cancer 5:388–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Missmer SA, Eliassen AH, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE (2004) Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentrations and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1856–1865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tamimi RM, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Byrne C (2005) Endogenous sex hormone levels and mammographic density among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2641–2647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Little L, Lockwood G, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1996) Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images. Eur J Cancer Prev 5:319–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Byrne C (1999) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: the evolution of assessment techniques and implications for understanding breast cancer. Semin Breast Dis 2:301–314

    Google Scholar 

  28. Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M, Hankinson SE (2000) Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res 60:3744–3748

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stunkard A, Sorensen T, Schulsinger F (1983) Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. In: Kety S, Rowland L, Sidman S, Mathysee S (eds) The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Raven Press, New York, pp 115–120

    Google Scholar 

  30. Must A, Willett WC, Dietz WH (1993) Remote recall of childhood height, weight, and body build by elderly subjects. Am J Epidemiol 138:56–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolf AM, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Corsano KA, Rosner B, Kriska A, Willett WC (1994) Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 23:991–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Magnusson C, Baron J, Persson I, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Trichopoulos D, Adami HO (1998) Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer 76:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lam PB, Vacek PM, Geller BM, Muss HB (2000) The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont. Cancer 89:369–375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB, Sadowsky NL, Kalisher L, Twaddle JA, Meyer JE, Henschke CI, Cole P (1984) Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 119:371–381

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, Yaffe M, Minkin S (2006) Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:2086–2092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Russo J, Russo I (1997) Role of differentiation in the pathogenesis and prevention of breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 4:7–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Russo J, Russo IH (1987) Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Lab Invest 57:112–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Simpson ER, Zhao Y, Agarwal VR, Michael MD, Bulun SE, Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S, Sun T, Fisher CR, Qin K, Mendelson CR (1997) Aromatase expression in health and disease. Recent Prog Horm Res 52:185–213; discussion 213–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li T, Sun L, Miller N, Nicklee T, Woo J, Hulse-Smith L, Tsao MS, Khokha R, Martin L, Boyd N (2005) The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:343–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Boyd NF, Greenberg C, Lockwood G, Little L, Martin L, Byng J, Yaffe M, Tritchler D (1997) Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:488–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Siozon CC, Ma H, Hilsen M, Bernstein L, Ursin G (2006) The association between recreational physical activity and mammographic density. Int J Cancer 119(7):1695–1701

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Suijkerbuijk KP, Van Duijnhoven FJ, Van Gils CH, Van Noord PA, Peeters PH, Friedenreich CM, Monninkhof EM (2006) Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:456–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA (2000) Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 11:653–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Must A, Phillips SM, Naumova EN, Blum M, Harris S, Dawson-Hughes B, Rand WM (2002) Recall of early menstrual history and menarcheal body size: after 30 years, how well do women remember? Am J Epidemiol 155:672–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ (1995) Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ (1994) The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 39:1629–1638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Brisson J, Merletti F, Sadowsky NL, Twaddle JA, Morrison AS, Cole P (1982) Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 115:428–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thomas DB, Carter RA, Bush WH Jr, Ray RM, Stanford JL, Lehman CD, Daling JR, Malone K, Davis S (2002) Risk of subsequent breast cancer in relation to characteristics of screening mammograms from women less than 50 years of age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:565–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kato I, Beinart C, Bleich A, Su S, Kim M, Toniolo PG (1995) A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States). Cancer Causes Control 6:431–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Saftlas AF, Wolfe JN, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, Schairer C, Salane M, Szklo M (1989) Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 129:518–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Marcelli G, Pellizzoni R, Pesce B, Risso G, Russo F, Scorsolini A (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 14:269–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kerlikowske K (2007) The mammogram that cried Wolfe. N Engl J Med 356:297–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:1801–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, Bernstein L, Salane M, Parisky YR, Astrahan M, Siozon CC, Pike MC (2003) Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:332–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Vachon CM, Kushi LH, Cerhan JR, Kuni CC, Sellers TA (2000) Association of diet and mammographic breast density in the Minnesota breast cancer family cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:151–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by Public Health Service Grants CA087969, CA075016, the SPORE in Breast Cancer CA089393, from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services and the Breast Cancer Research Fund. Dr Graham Colditz is supported in part by an American Cancer Society clinical research professorship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 181 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Goli Samimi, Heather J. Baer & Rulla M. Tamimi

  2. Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, DCP, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Goli Samimi

  3. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, 63110, USA

    Graham A. Colditz

  4. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Heather J. Baer & Rulla M. Tamimi

Authors
  1. Goli Samimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Graham A. Colditz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heather J. Baer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rulla M. Tamimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rulla M. Tamimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samimi, G., Colditz, G.A., Baer, H.J. et al. Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses’ Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 109, 113–122 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9631-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9631-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation