This is an explorative study applying presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) to investigate the spatial distributions of motor sites to reveal tumor-induced brain plasticity in patients with brain tumors. We analyzed nTMS-based motor maps derived from presurgical mapping of 100 patients with motor eloquently located brain tumors (tumors in the frontal lobe, the precentral gyrus [PrG], the postcentral gyrus [PoG], the remaining parietal lobe, or the temporal lobe). Based on these motor maps, we systematically investigated changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) counts among 4 gyri (PrG, PoG, medial frontal gyrus, and superior frontal gyrus) between subgroups of patients according to the tumor location in order to depict the tumor’s influence on reorganization. When comparing patients with different tumor locations, high MEP counts were elicited less frequently by stimulating the PrG in patients with tumors directly affecting the PrG (p < 0.05). Still, in more than 50% of these patients, the MEP counts elicited by stimulating the PrG were higher than average, indicating robust motor representations within the primary motor cortex. In contrast, patients with PoG and parietal tumors primarily showed high MEP counts when stimulating the PoG (p < 0.10). The functional reorganization is not likely to induce a shift of motor function from the PrG to adjacent regions but rather leads to a reorganization within anatomical constraints, such as of the PoG. Thus, presurgical nTMS-based motor mapping sensitively depicted the tumor-induced plasticity of the motor cortex.
Brain tumor Cortical mapping Motor evoked potentials Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation Presurgical motor mapping
Abductor digiti minimi muscle
Analysis of variance
Abductor pollicis brevis muscle
British Medical Research Council
Direct cortical stimulation
Flexor carpi radialis muscle
Motor evoked potential
Middle frontal gyrus
Magnetic resonance imaging
Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
Resting motor threshold
Superior frontal gyrus
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
LB and NS gratefully acknowledge the support of the Graduate School’s Faculty Graduate Center of Medicine at our university. Moreover, the study was supported by grants of the Wilhelm Sander foundation.
The study was financed by institutional grants from the Department of Neurosurgery, the Section of Neuroradiology, and the Wilhelm Sander foundation.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
SK and BM are consultants for Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany). SK is a consultant for Nexstim Plc. (Helsinki, Finland). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Capelle L et al (2013) Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases: clinical article. J Neurosurg 118:1157–1168. doi:10.3171/2013.1.JNS121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Rossini PM (1997) Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2–4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 105:438–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Conway N et al (2017) Cortical plasticity of motor-eloquent areas measured by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with glioma. J Neurosurg:1–11 doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS161595
Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H (2007) Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to. Brain Plast Brain 130:898–914. doi:10.1093/brain/awl300Google Scholar
Duffau H, Denvil D, Capelle L (2002) Long term reshaping of language, sensory, and motor maps after glioma resection: a new parameter to integrate in the surgical strategy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 72:511–516Google Scholar
Hayashi Y, Nakada M, Kinoshita M, Hamada J (2014) Functional reorganization in the patient with progressing glioma of the pure primary motor cortex: a case report with special reference to the topographic central sulcus defined by somatosensory-evoked potential. World Neurosurg 82:536 e531–534 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.084
Ius T, Angelini E, Thiebaut de Schotten M, Mandonnet E, Duffau H (2011) Evidence for potentials and limitations of brain plasticity using an atlas of functional resectability of WHO grade II gliomas: towards a “minimal common brain”. Neuroimage 56:992–1000. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.022CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Krieg SM, Shiban E, Buchmann N, Gempt J, Foerschler A, Meyer B, Ringel F (2012) Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas. J Neurosurg 116:994–1001. doi:10.3171/2011.12.JNS111524CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Picht T et al (2011) Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct. Cortic Stimul Neurosurg 69:581–588. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181b89 (discussion 588)Google Scholar
Picht T, Strack V, Schulz J, Zdunczyk A, Frey D, Schmidt S, Vajkoczy P (2012) Assessing the functional status of the motor system in brain tumor patients using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurochir 154:2075–2081. doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1494-yCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rosenstock T, Grittner U, Acker G, Schwarzer V, Kulchytska N, Vajkoczy P, Picht T (2016) Risk stratification in motor area-related glioma surgery based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data. J Neurosurg. doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS152896PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rossini PM et al (1994) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:79–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rossini PM et al (2015) Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol 126:1071–1107. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Uematsu S et al (1992) Motor and sensory cortex in humans: topography studied with chronic subdural stimulation. Neurosurgery 31:59–71 (discussion 71-52)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
van Geemen K, Herbet G, Moritz-Gasser S, Duffau H (2014) Limited plastic potential of the left ventral premotor cortex in speech articulation: evidence from intraoperative awake mapping in glioma patients. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1587–1596. doi:10.1002/hbm.22275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJ, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS (1993) Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 33:181–189. doi:10.1002/ana.410330208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich G, Knorr U, Herzog H, Kiwit JC, Freund HJ, Seitz RJ (1998) Precentral glioma location determines the displacement of cortical hand representation. Neurosurgery 42:18–26 (discussion 26-17)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar