Brain Topography

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 202–217 | Cite as

Electrophysiological Modulation in an Effort to Complete Illusory Figures: Configuration, Illusory Contour and Closure Effects

Original Paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Figure recognition process: From the coarse configuration standing from the background to the closure of a meaningful shape, was investigated by ERP technique. ERP components at different latencies from stimulus onset allowed to tap into the figure recognition process at discrete time-points when different cognitive operations take place. In this study, we present two experiments where the support-ratio (SR) of illusory figures was manipulated to vary continuously the recognition of geometrical figures. In the first experiment three shapes were used to vary the SR and the P1 component (80–130 ms) was modulated by the configuration-effect explained, in part for the first time, with the unbalanced physical stimulation between upper and lower visual field. In the second experiment, we used one shape and varied systematically the SR in a discrimination task. The N1 (130–180 ms) and the N2 (230–270 ms) were modulated by two effects: The Ic-effect, represented by the N1, and the closure-effect, represented by the N2, being larger when the SR was small and the discrimination more difficult with respect to large SRs and easier discrimination. These results showed that figure recognition proceeded from the coarse parsing of the visual scene (configuration-effect), through the completion of a set of illusory borders (Ic-effect) to the final assembling of a meaningful shape (closure-effect).

Keywords

ERPs Illusory figure LOC Figure-ground segmentation Visual system hierarchy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported, in part, by research funding of the University of Verona. We are grateful to three anonymous referees who contributed to greatly improve the paper with their comments and criticisms.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. Altschuler T, Molholm S, Russo N, Snyder A, Brandwein A, Blanco D, Foxe J (2012) Early electrophysiological indices of illusory contour processing within the lateral occipital complex are virtually impervious to manipulations of illusion strength. Neuroimage 59:4074–4085CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altschuler T, Molholm S, Butler J, Mercier M, Brandwein A, Foxe J (2014) The effort to close the gap: tracking the development of illusory contour processing in childhood to adulthood with high-density electrical mapping. Neuroimage 90:360–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlasov-loffe A, Hochstein S (2008) Perceiving illusory contours: Figure detection and shape discrimination. J Vision 8(11): 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlasov-loffe A, Hochstein S (2009) Illusory-contours figures prime matching of real shapes. Perception 38:1118–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark VP, Fan S, Hiilyard SA (1995) Identification of early visually evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum Brain Mapp 2:170–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Russo F, Martinez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA (2002) Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum Brain Mapp 15:95–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Doniger G, Foxe J, Murray M, Higgins B, Snodgrass J, Schroeder C, Javitt D (2000) Activation timecourse of ventral visual stream object-recognition areas: high density electrical mapping of perceptual closure processes. J Cog Neurosci 12:4:615–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doniger G, Foxe J, Schroeder C, Murray M, Higgins B, Javitt D (2001) Visual perceptual learning in human object recognition areas: a repetition priming study using high-density electrical mapping. Neuroimage 13:2:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doniger G, Foxe J, Murray M, Higgins B, Javitt D (2002) Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59:11:1011–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foxe J, Murray M, Javitt D (2005) Filling-in in schizophrenia: a high-density electrical mapping and source-analysis investigation of illusory contour processing. Cereb Cortex 15(12):1914–1927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grill-Spector K, Kanwisher N (2001) The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition. Vision Res 41:1409–1422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Halgren E, Mendola J, Ching CDR, Dale AM (2003) Cortical activation to illusory shapes as measured with magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 18:1001–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hermann CS, Mecklinger A, Pfeifer E (1999) Gamma responses and ERPs in a visual classification task. Clin Neurophysiol 110:636–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann CS, Boch V (2001) IC perception modulates early visual processing. Cog Neurosci 12(5):901–904Google Scholar
  15. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L (1998) Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:781–787CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Hochstein S, Ahissar M (2002) View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36:791–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennings JR, Wood CC (1976) The e-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiology 13:277–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanizsa G (1987) Quasi-perceptual margins in homogeneously stimulated fields. In: Petry S, Meyer G (eds) The perception of illusory contours. Springer, New York, pp 40–49 (Original work published1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kobatake E, Tanaka K (1994) Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 71:856–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lesher GW, Mingolla E (1993) The role of edges and line-ends in illusory contours formation. Vision Res 33(16):2253–2270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Luck SJ (2005) An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 34–38Google Scholar
  22. Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 51–74Google Scholar
  23. Mendola JD, Dale AM, Fischl B, Liu AK, Tottel R. B. H. (1999) The representation of illusory contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 19(19):8560–8572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Murray M, Herrmann C (2013) Illusory contours: a window onto the neurophysiology of constructing perception. Trends Cog Sci 17(9):471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Murray MM, Wylie GR, Higgins BA, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE, Foxe JJ (2002). The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 22(12):5055–5073PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murray M, Foxe D, Javitt D, Foxe J (2004) Setting boundaries: Brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans. J Neurosci 24(31):6898–6903CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray M, Imber M, Javitt D, Foxe J (2006) Boundary completion is automatic and dissociable from shape discrmination. J Neurosci 26:46:12043–12054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noesselt T, Hillyard S, Woldorff M, Shoenfeld A, Hagner T, Jancke L, Tempelmann C, Hinrichs H, Heinze H (2002) Delayed striate cortical activation during spatial attention. Neuron 35:575–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pegna A, Khateb A, Murray M, Landis T, Michel C (2002) Neural processing of illusory and real contours revealed by high-density ERP mapping. Cog Neurosci Neuropsych 13(7):965–968Google Scholar
  30. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:184–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Seghier M, Vuilleumier P (2006) Functional neuroimaging findings on the human perception of illusory contours. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:595–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sehatpour P, Molholm S, Javitt D, Foxe J (2006) Spatiotemporal dynamics of human object recognition processing: an integrated high-density electrical mapping and functional imaging study of “closure” processes. Neuroimage 29(2):605–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shpaner M, Murray M, Foxe J (2009) Early processing in the human lateral occipital complex is highly responsive to illusory contours but not to salient regions. Eur J Neurosci 30:2018–2028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Stanley DA, Rubin N (2003). fMRI activation in response to illusory contours and salient regions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 37, 323–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stanley DA, Rubin N (2005) Rapid detection of salient region: evidence from apparent motion. J Vision 5:690–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sugawara M, Morotomi T (1991) Visual evoked potentials elicited by subjective contour figures. Scand J Psychol 32:352–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosciences, Section of Physiology and PsychologyUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations