Cortical Plasticity in 4-Month-Old Infants: Specific Effects of Experience with Musical Timbres
- 378 Downloads
Animal models suggest that the brain is particularly neuroplastic early in development, but previous studies have not systematically controlled the auditory environment in human infants and observed the effects on auditory cortical representations. We exposed 4-month-old infants to melodies in either guitar or marimba timbre (infants were randomly assigned to exposure group) for a total of ~160 min over the course of a week, after which we measured electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to guitar and marimba tones at pitches not previously heard during the exposure phase. A frontally negative response with a topography consistent with generation in auditory areas, peaking around 450 ms, was significantly larger for guitar than marimba tones in the guitar-exposed group but significantly larger for marimba than guitar tones in the marimba-exposed group. This indicates that experience with tones in a particular timbre affects representations for that timbre, and that this effect generalizes to tones not previously experienced during exposure. Furthermore, mismatch responses to occasional small 3% changes in pitch were larger for tones in guitar than marimba timbre only for infants exposed to guitar tones. Together these results indicate that a relatively small amount of passive exposure to a particular timbre in infancy enhances representations of that timbre and leads to more precise pitch processing for that timbre.
KeywordsCortical plasticity Auditory Learning Timbre Music Development Infancy
This research was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to LJT. We thank Elaine Whiskin for help in collecting the data.
- Curtin S, Werker J (2007) The perceptual foundations of phonological development. In: Gaskell G (ed) The oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 579–599Google Scholar
- Kuhl P (2008) Linking infant speech perception to language acquisition: Phonetic learning predicts language growth. In: McCardle P, Colombo J, Freund L (eds) Infant pathways to language: methods models and research directions. Erlbaum, New York, pp 213–243Google Scholar
- Roberts LE, Bosnyak DJ, Shahin AJ, Trainor LJ (2004) Neuroplastic adaptations of the auditory system in musicians and nonmusicians. In: Syka J, Merzenich M (eds) Plasticity and signal representation in the auditory system. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 343–350Google Scholar
- Schlaug G (2009) Oxford handbook of music psychology. In: Hallen S, Cross I, Thaut M (eds) Music, musicians and brain plasticity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 197–207Google Scholar
- Trainor LJ (2008) Event related potential measures in auditory developmental research. In: Schmidt L, Segalowitz S (eds) Developmental psychophysiology: theory systems and methods. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 69–102Google Scholar
- Trainor LJ, He C (2010) Auditory and musical development. In: Zelazo P (ed) Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Trainor LJ, Zatorre R (2009) The neurobiological basis of musical expectations: From probabilities to emotional meaning. In: Hallen S, Cross I, Thaut M (eds) Oxford handbook of music psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–182Google Scholar
- Trainor L, Desjardins R, Rockel C (1999) A comparison of contour and interval processing in musicians and non-musicians using event-related potentials. Aust J Psychol: Special Issue on music as a brain and behavioural system 51:147–153Google Scholar
- Werner LA (2007) Human auditory development. In: Hoy R, Dallos P, Oertel D (eds) The senses: a comprehensive reference, volume 3—audition. Academic Press, New York, pp 871–894Google Scholar