Advertisement

Brain Topography

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 281–293 | Cite as

Using EEG to Explore How rTMS Produces Its Effects on Behavior

  • Jeffrey S. Johnson
  • Massihullah Hamidi
  • Bradley R. Postle
Original Paper

Abstract

A commonly held view is that, when delivered during the performance of a task, repetitive TMS (rTMS) influences behavior by producing transient “virtual lesions” in targeted tissue. However, findings of rTMS-related improvements in performance are difficult to reconcile with this assumption. With regard to the mechanism whereby rTMS influences concurrent task performance, a combined rTMS/EEG study conducted in our lab has revealed a complex set of relations between rTMS, EEG activity, and behavioral performance, with the effects of rTMS on power in the alpha band and on alpha:gamma phase synchrony each predicting its effect on behavior. These findings suggest that rTMS influences performance by biasing endogenous task-related oscillatory dynamics, rather than creating a “virtual lesion”. To further differentiate these two alternatives, in the present study we compared the effects of 10 Hz rTMS on neural activity with the results of an experiment in which rTMS was replaced with 10 Hz luminance flicker. We reasoned that 10 Hz flicker would produce widespread entrainment of neural activity to the flicker frequency, and comparison of these EEG results with those from the rTMS study would shed light on whether the latter also reflected entrainment to an exogenous stimulus. Results revealed pronounced evidence for “entrainment noise” produced by 10 Hz flicker—increased oscillatory power and inter-trial coherence (ITC) at the driving frequency, and increased alpha:gamma phase synchronization—that were nonetheless largely uncorrelated with behavior. This contrasts markedly with 10-Hz rTMS, for which the only evidence for stimulation-induced noise, elevated ITC at 30 Hz, differed qualitatively from the flicker results. Simultaneous recording of the EEG thus offers an important means of directly testing assumptions about how rTMS exerts its effects on behavior.

Keywords

TMS EEG Virtual lesion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The flicker and rTMS experiments were both performed in the laboratory of Giulio Tononi, and many members of this research group provided valuable technical assistance and discussions of the results. The work was supported by R01 MH069448 (B.R.P.), F32 MH088115 (J.S.J.), F30 MH078705 (M.H.), and NARSAD (G.T.).

References

  1. Arnoult MD, Atteave F (1956) The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol Bull 53:452–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Esser SK, Hill SL, Tononi G (2005) Modeling the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical circuits. J Neurophysiol 94:622–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Feredoes E, Tononi G, Postle BR (2006) Direct evidence for a prefrontal contribution to the control of proactive interference in verbal working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:19530–19534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrarelli F, Massimini M, Peterson MJ, Riedner BA, Lazar M, Murphy MJ, Huber R, Rosanova M, Alexander AL, Kalin N, Tononi G (2008) Reduced evoked gamma oscillations in the frontal cortex in schizophrenia patients: a TMS/EEG study. Am J Psychiatry 165:996–1005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Grosbras MH, Paus T (2003) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field facilitates visual awareness. Eur J Neurosci 18:3121–3126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamidi M, Tononi G, Postle BR (2008) Evaluating frontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res 1230:202–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamidi M, Slagter HA, Tononi G, Postle BR (2009a) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation affects behavior by biasing endogenous cortical oscillations. Front Integr Neurosci 3:14. doi: 10.3389/neuro.07.014.2009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamidi M, Tononi G, Postle BR (2009b) Evaluating the role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in memory-guided response with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia 47:295–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamidi M, Slagter HA, Tononi G, Postle BR (in press) Brain responses evoked by high-frequency repetitive TMS: an ERP study. Brain Stimulat. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.04.001
  11. Harris JA, Clifford CWG, Miniussi C (2008) The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Signal suppression or neural noise generation? J Cogn Neurosci 20:734–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Heerrmann CS (2001) Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz Flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp Brain Res 137:346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y-Z, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC (2005) Theta burst stimulation of the motor cortex. Neuron 45:201–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ilmoniemi R, Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Karhu J, Aronen H, Naatanen R, Katila T (1997) Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport 8:3537–3540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jokisch D, Jensen O (2007) Modulation of gamma and alpha activity during a working memory task engaging the dorsal or ventral stream. J Neurosci 27:3244–3251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahkonen S, Komssi S, Wilenius J, Ilmoniemi RJ (2005) Prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation produces intensity-dependent EEG responses in humans. NeuroImage 24:955–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Gerloff C (2003) Enhancing cognitive performance with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at human individual alpha frequency. Eur J Neurosci 17:1129–1133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Komssi S, Kahkonen S, Ilmoniemi R (2004) The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 21:154–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luber B, Kinnunen LH, Rakitin BC, Ellsasser R, Stern Y, Lisanby SH (2007) Facilitation of performance in a working memory task with rTMS stimulation of the precuneus: frequency- and time-dependent effects. Brain Res 1128:120–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Makeig S (1993) Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 86:283–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Makeig S, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Enghoff S, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ (2002) Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 295:690–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Huber R, Esser SK, Singh H, Tononi G (2005) Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science 309:2228–2232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Miniussi C, Ruzzoli M, Walsh V (in press) The mechanism of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in cognition. Cortex. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.004
  24. Palva S, Palva JM (2007) New vistas for α-frequency band oscillations. Trends Neurosci 30:150–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Palva JM, Palva S, Kaila K (2005) Phase synchrony among neuronal oscillations in the human cortex. J Neurosci 25:3962–3972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Faz D, Keenan J (1999) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behavior relationship by induction of ‘virtual lesions’. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354:1229–1238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Pasley BN, Allen EA, Freeman RD (2009) State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex. Neuron 62:291–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:184–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Postle BR, Hamidi M (2007) Nonvisual codes and nonvisual brain areas support visual working memory. Cereb Cortex 17:2134–2142Google Scholar
  30. Postle BR, Ferrarelli F, Hamidi M, Feredoes E, Massimini M, Peterson M, Alexander A, Tononi G (2006a) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation dissociates working memory manipulation from retention functions in the prefrontal but not posterior parietal, cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 18:1712–1722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Postle BR, Idzikowski C, Della Salla S, Logie RH, Baddeley AD (2006b) The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements. Q J Exp Psychol 59:100–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Regan D (1977) Steady-state evoked potentials. J Opt Soc Am 67:1475–1489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosanova M, Casali A, Bellina V, Resta F, Mariotti M, Massimini M (2009) Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. J Neurosci 29:7679–7685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharbrough F, Chatrian G-E, Lesser RP, Lüders H, Nuwer M, Picton TW (1991) American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 8:200–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silvanto J, Muggleton NG (2008) New light through old windows: moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 39:549–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Silvanto J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V (2007) Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 25:1874–1881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sinkkonen J, Tiitinen H, Naatanen R (1995) Gabor filters: an informative way of analysing eventy-related brain activity. J Neurosci Methods 56:99–104CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sperkeijse H, Estevez O, Reits D (1977) Visual evoked potentials and the physiological analysis of visual processes in man. In: Desmedt JE (ed) Visual evoked potentials in man: new developments. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 16–89Google Scholar
  39. Srinivasan R, Bibi FA, Nuñez PL (2006) Steady-state visual evoked potentials: distributed local sources and wave-like dynamics are sensitive to flicker frequency. Brain Topogr 18:167–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J (1996) Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in humans. J Neurosci 16:4240–4249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tass P, Rosenblum MG, Weule J, Kurths J, Pikovsky A, Volkmann J, Schnitzler A, Freund H-J (1998) Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: application to magnetoencephalography. Phys Rev Lett 81:3291–3294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thut G, Miniussi C (2009) New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies. Trends Cogn Sci 13:182–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Töpper R, Mottaghy FM, Brügmann M, Noth J, Huber W (1998) Facilitation of picture naming by focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of Wernicke’s area. Exp Brain Res 121:371–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Näätanen R, Ilmoniemi RJ (1999) Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:322–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Walsh V, Cowey A (1998) Magnetic stimulation studies of visual cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walsh V, Pascual-Leone A (2003) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochronometrics of mind. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Walsh V, Rushworth M (1999) A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia 37:125–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams JH (2001) Frequency-specific effects of flicker on recognition memory. Neuroscience 104:283–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Ziemann U (in press) TMS in cognitive neuroscience: virtual lesion and beyond. Cortex. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.020

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey S. Johnson
    • 1
  • Massihullah Hamidi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Bradley R. Postle
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Medical Scientist Training ProgramUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Neuroscience Training ProgramUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations