Brain Topography

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 183–191 | Cite as

Affective Prime and Target Picture Processing: An ERP Analysis of Early and Late Interference Effects

  • Tobias Flaisch
  • Jessica Stockburger
  • Harald T. Schupp
Original Paper


Viewing emotionally arousing compared to neutral pictures is associated with differential electrophysiological activity in early (“early posterior negativity”, EPN), as well as later time-windows (“late positive potential”, LPP). A previous study revealed that the EPN is reduced when the preceding prime picture was emotional. The present study explored whether sequential interference effects are specific for early processing stages or extend to later processing stages. Dense sensor ERPs were measured while subjects viewed a continuous stream of pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant pictures, presented for 660 ms each. Previous results were replicated in that emotional pictures were associated with enlarged EPN and LPP amplitudes compared to neutral pictures. Furthermore, the EPN to emotional and neutral pictures was reduced when preceded by pleasant prime pictures. The novel finding was that emotional compared to neutral prime pictures were associated with reduced LPP amplitudes to the subsequently presented picture irrespective of its emotional valence (pleasant, neutral, unpleasant). These results demonstrate sustained interference effects in serial picture presentations discussed within a framework of resource competition among successive pictures.


Attention Emotion ERP Interference Early posterior negativity Late positive potential 



This research was supported by grants from the German research foundation Schu1074/10-1 and Schu1074/7-4 to Harald Schupp.


  1. 1.
    Junghöfer M, Bradley MM, Elbert TR, Lang PJ. Fleeting images: a new look at early emotion discrimination. Psychophysiology 2001;38:175–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schupp HT, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO. Emotional facilitation of sensory processing in the visual cortex. Psychol Sci 2003;14:7–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schupp HT, Stockburger J, Codispoti M, Junghöfer M, Weike AI, Hamm AO. Selective visual attention to emotion. J Neurosci 2007;27:1082–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M, editors. Attention and emotion: sensory and motivational processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997. pp 97–135.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Emotion and motivation. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GG, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. pp 602–42.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flaisch T, Junghöfer M, Bradley MM, Schupp HT, Lang PJ. Rapid picture processing: affective primes and targets. Psychophysiology 2008;45:1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Most SB, Chun MM, Widders DM, Zald DH. Attentional rubbernecking: cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness. Psychon Bull Rev 2005;12:654–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Most SB, Smith SD, Cooter AB, Levy BN, Zald DH. The naked truth: positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target detection. Cogn Emot 2007;21:964–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schupp HT, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghöfer M. Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. Prog Brain Res 2006;156:31–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Del Cul A, Baillet S, Dehaene S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness. PLoS Biol 2007;5:2408–23.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Codispoti M, Ferrari V, Bradley MM. Repetitive picture processing: autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Res 2006;1068:213–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Codispoti M, Ferrari V, Bradley MM. Repetition and event-related potentials: distinguishing early and late processes in affective picture perception. J Cogn Neurosci 2007;19:577–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isreal JB, Chesney GL, Wickens CD, Donchin E. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 1980;17:259–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roth WT, Dorato KH, Kopell BS. Intensity and task effects on evoked physiological response to noise bursts. Psychophysiology 1984;21:466–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polich J. P300 from a passive auditory paradigm. J Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;74:312–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ. Probe P3 and blinks: two measures of affective startle modulation. Psychophysiology 1997;34:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Shapiro KL. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1998;24:1656–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kranczioch C, Debener S, Engel AK. Event-related potential correlates of the attentional blink phenomenon. Cogn Brain Res 2003;17:177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sergent C, Baillet S, Dehaene S. Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:1391–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klauer KC, Musch J. Affective priming: findings and theories. In: Musch J, Klauer KC, editors. The psychology of evaluation: affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum; 2003. pp 7–49.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 2005.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Tucker DM, Rockstroh B. Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. Psychophysiology 2000;37:523–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Potter MC. Understanding sentences and scenes: the role of conceptual short-term memory. In: Coltheart V, editor. Fleeting memories: cognition of brief visual stimuli. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; 1999. pp 13–46.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shapiro K, Arnell KM, Raymond JE. The attentional blink. Trends Cogn Sci 1997;1:291–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donchin E, Kramer AF, Wickens C. Applications of brain event-related potentials to problems in engineering psychology. In: Coles MGH, Donchin E, Porges SW, editors. Psychophysiology: systems, processes, and applications. The Guilford Press: New York; 1986. pp 702–18.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Hillman CH, Hamm AO, Lang PJ. Brain processes in emotional perception: motivated attention. Cogn Emot 2004;18:593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Potter MC, Staub A, O’Connor DH. The time course of competition for attention: attention is initially labile. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002;28:1149–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hillyard SA, Squires KC, Bauer JW, Lindsay PH. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science 1971;25:1357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Werheid K, Alpay G, Jentzsch I, Sommer W. Priming emotional facial expressions as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Int J Psychophysiol 2005;55:209–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Campanella S, Quinet P, Bruyer R, Crommelinck M, Guerit JM. Categorical perception of happiness and fear facial expressions: an ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci 2002;14:210–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sabatinelli D, Bradley MM, Fitzsimmons JR, Lang PJ. Parallel amygdala and inferotemporal activation reflect emotional intensity and fear relevance. Neuroimage 2005;24:1265–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keysers C, Perrett DI. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:120–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pessoa L, McKenna M, Gutierrez E, Ungerleider LG. Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:11458–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pourtois G, Grandjean D, Sander D, Vuilleumier P. Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:619–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Flaisch T, Steinhauser M, Hübner R, Schupp HT. Emotional aftereffects: when emotion impairs subsequent picture recognition; submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Flaisch
    • 1
  • Jessica Stockburger
    • 1
  • Harald T. Schupp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations