Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 170, Issue 3, pp 373–394 | Cite as

The Spanwise Variation of Roof-Level Turbulence in a Street-Canyon Flow

  • Thomas JaroslawskiEmail author
  • Laurent Perret
  • Karin Blackman
  • Eric Savory
Research Article
  • 150 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of upstream roughness and canyon width on turbulent street-canyon flow is investigated, using wind-tunnel measurements made in a horizontal plane at near roof level of a street canyon and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Three upstream roughness arrays and two canyon width (W) to height (h) aspect ratios (AR = W/h = 1 and 3) are used; the arrays consist of three-dimensional cubes (plan area density, λp = 25%), 1h-spaced two-dimensional bars (skimming flow, λp = 50%) and 3h-spaced two-dimensional bars (wake-interference flow, λp = 25%). Understanding the spanwise structure of the flow and how it interacts with large-scale structures is necessary to reliably predict the mean pollutant transport in the lateral direction along the canyon and to further investigate the three-dimensional behaviour of turbulent street-canyon flows. The mean turbulent statistics are presented, whilst two-point correlations and integral length scales are computed for the different configurations. The results show a significant effect of upstream roughness on these quantities. The total turbulent kinetic energy and shear stress are found to be highest for the wake-interference flow regimes and lowest for the skimming-flow regimes. It is found that the three-dimensional upstream roughness configurations result in a significantly weaker correlation in the spanwise direction at canyon roof level, with a similar trend observed in the spanwise integral length scales. The shear-layer thickness is found to be related to the magnitude of the correlations near roof level of the street canyon.

Keywords

Boundary layer Particle image velocimetry Spanwise turbulence correlations Street canyon Wind tunnel 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Thibaut Piquet for his technical support during the experimental program, the Douglas Muzyka Scholarship (The University of Western Ontario, Canada) and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada for providing funding. Financial support of the French National Research Agency through the research Grant URBANTURB No. ANR-14-CE22-0012-01 is also acknowledged.

References

  1. Ashcroft C, Zhang X (2005) Vortical structures over rectangular cavities at low speed. Phys Fluids 17:015104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackman K, Perret L, Savory E (2015) Effect of upstream flow regime on street canyon flow mean turbulence statistics. Environ Fluid Mech 15:823–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman K, Perret L, Savory E (2018) Effect of upstream flow regime and canyon upstream ratio on non-liner interactions between a street canyon flow and the overlying boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0378-y Google Scholar
  4. Cheng H, Hayden P, Robins AG, Castro IP (2007) Flow over cube arrays of different packing densities. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 95:715–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38:1262–1292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inagaki A, Maruyama A, Kanda M (2009) Spatial and temporal scales of coherent turbulence over outdoor reduced urban scale model. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on urban climate, 29 June–3 July 2009, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Kasamatsu F (2004) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent organized structures within and above explicitly resolved cube arrays. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:343–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang W, Sung HJ (2009) Large-scale structures of turbulent flows over an open cavity. J Fluids Struct 25(8):1318–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang W, Lee SB, Sung HJ (2008) Self-sustained oscillations of turbulent flows over an open cavity. Exp Fluids 45(4):693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Little J, Debiasi M, Caraballo E, Samimy M (2007) Effects of open-loop and closed-loop control on subsonic cavity flows. Phys Fluids 19(6):065104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marciotto ER, Fisch G (2013) Wind tunnel study of turbulent flow past an urban canyon model. Environ Fluid Mech 13:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michioka T, Sato A (2012) Effect of incoming turbulent structure on pollutant removal from two-dimensional street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 145:469–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Michioka T, Takimoto H, Sato A (2014) Large-eddy simulation of pollutant removal from a three-dimensional street canyon. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 150:259–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nosek Š, Kukačka L, Jurčáková K, Kellnerová R, Jaňour Z (2017) Impact of roof height non-uniformity on pollutant transport between a street canyon and intersections. Environ Pollut 227:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Perret L, Savory E (2013) Large-scale structures over a single street canyon immersed in an urban-type boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148:111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Perret L, Blackman K, Savory E (2016) Combining wind-tunnel and field measurements of street-canyon flow via stochastic estimation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 161(3):491–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salizzoni P, Marro M, Soulhac L, Grosjean N, Perkins RJ (2011) Turbulent transfer between street canyons and the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 141(3):393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Savory E, Perret L, Rivet C (2013) Modelling considerations for examining the mean and unsteady flow in a simple urban-type street canyon. Meteorol Atmos Phys 121:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shaw RH, Brunet Y, Finnigan JJ, Raupach MR (1995) A wind tunnel study of air flow in waving wheat: two-point velocity statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76:349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takimoto H, Sato A, Barlow JF, Moriwaki R, Inagaki A, Onomura S, Kanda M (2011) Particle image velocimetry measurements of turbulent flow within outdoor and indoor urban scale models and flushing motions in urban canopy layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140(2):295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takimoto H, Inagaki A, Kanda M, Sato A, Michioka T (2013) Length-scale similarity of turbulent organized structures over surfaces with different roughness types. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(2):217–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Volino RJ, Schultz MP, Flack KA (2009) Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness. J Fluid Mech 635:75–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watanabe T (2004) Large-eddy simulation of coherent turbulence structures associated with scalar ramps over plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:307–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Jaroslawski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laurent Perret
    • 2
  • Karin Blackman
    • 2
  • Eric Savory
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.LHEEA, UMR CNRS 6598Centrale NantesNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations