Simulations of Turbulent Flow Over Complex Terrain Using an Immersed-Boundary Method
- 300 Downloads
We present an immersed-boundary method to simulate high-Reynolds-number turbulent flow over the complex terrain of Askervein and Bolund Hills under neutrally-stratified conditions. We reconstruct both the velocity and the eddy-viscosity fields in the terrain-normal direction to produce turbulent stresses as would be expected from the application of a surface-parametrization scheme based on Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. We find that it is essential to be consistent in the underlying assumptions for the velocity reconstruction and the eddy-viscosity relation to produce good results. To this end, we reconstruct the tangential component of the velocity field using a logarithmic velocity profile and adopt the mixing-length model in the near-surface turbulence model. We use a linear interpolation to reconstruct the normal component of the velocity to enforce the impermeability condition. Our approach works well for both the Askervein and Bolund Hills when the flow is attached to the surface, but shows slight disagreement in regions of flow recirculation, despite capturing the flow reversal.
KeywordsComplex terrain Immersed-boundary method Large-eddy simulation Turbulence Wind energy
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 1056110 and 1229709. The first author would like to acknowledge the University of Idaho President’s Doctoral Scholars Award. We thank Prof. Ralph Budwig of the University of Idaho for helpful discussions and his continuous mentorship.
- Benocci C, Pinelli A (1990) The role of the forcing term in the large eddy simulation of equilibrium channel flow. In: Rodi W, Ganic E (eds) Engineering turbulence modeling and experiments. Elsevier, New York, pp 287–296Google Scholar
- Grötzbach G (1987) Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. In: Cheremisinoff NP (ed) Encyclopedia of fluid mechanics. West Orange, New Jersey, pp 1337–1391Google Scholar
- Jacobsen DA, Senocak I (2011) A full-depth amalgamated parallel 3D geometric multigrid solver for GPU clusters. In: 49th AIAA aerospace science meetingGoogle Scholar
- Marusic I, Kunkel GJ, Porté-Agel F (2001) Experimental study of wall boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation. J Fluid Mech 446:309–320Google Scholar
- Mohd-Yusof J (1997) Combined immersed boundary/B-spline methods for simulations of flow in complex geometries. In: Annual research briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames/Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Pielke RA (2013) Mesoscale meteorological modeling, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Prandtl L (1925) Bericht über die Entsteung der Turbulenz. Z Angew Math Mech 5:136–139Google Scholar
- Senocak I, Ackerman A, Stevens D, Mansour N (2004) Topography modeling in atmospheric flows using the immersed boundary method. In: Annual research briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames/Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Taylor P, Teunissen H (1985) The Askervein Hill project: report on the September/October 1983, main field experiment. Technical report, Canadian Meteorological Services Research BranchGoogle Scholar
- Tessicini F, Iaccarino G, Fatica M, Wang M, Verzicco R (2002) Wall modeling for large-eddy simulation using an immersed boundary method. In: Annual research briefs, Stanford University Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, CA, pp 181–187Google Scholar
- Yeow T, Cuerva-Tejero A, Perez-Alvarez J (2015) Reproducing the bolund experiment in wind tunnel. Wind Energy 18(1):153–169Google Scholar