Skip to main content
Log in

Validation and Sensitivity Study of the PMSS Modelling System for Puff Releases in the Joint Urban 2003 Field Experiment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Boundary-Layer Meteorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Joint Urban 2003 (JU 2003) experimental campaign took place in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, comprising both continuous and puff releases of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas. In the framework of the UDINEE project, intensive operation period 8 (IOP 8) conducted during the night is simulated using the Parallel-Micro-SWIFT-SPRAY (PMSS) three-dimensional modelling system. The PMSS modelling system is the assembly of a diagnostic or momentum flow solver (PSWIFT) and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model (PSPRAY) accounting for buildings and developed in parallel versions. A sensitivity study is performed regarding the flow modelling options, namely the meteorological data input, the characteristics of the turbulence, and the use of the diagnostic or momentum solver. Results shed light onto issues related to modelling puff releases in a built-up environment. Flow and concentration results are compared to measurements at the sample locations in IOP 8 and statistical metrics computed for all puffs released during IOP 8. These indicators illustrate satisfactory performance and robustness of the PMSS system with reference to the modelling options. Moreover, with moderate computational times and reliable predictions, the PMSS modelling system proves to be relevant for emergency response in cases of atmospheric release of hazardous materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allwine KJ, Flaherty JE (2006) Joint Urban 2003: study overview and instrument locations. Tech. Rep., Pacific Northwest National Lab, Richland, WA, PNNL-15967

  • Allwine KJ, Leach M, Stockham L, Shinn J, Hosker R, Bowers J, Pace J (2004) Overview of Joint Urban 2003: an atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City. In: Symposium on planning, nowcasting and forecasting in the Urban Zone, American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, 10–15 January, 2004, Seattle, Washington, USA

  • Anfossi D, Desiato F, Tinarelli G, Brusasca G, Ferrero E, Sacchetti D (1998) TRANSALP 1989 experimental campaign—II simulation of a tracer experiment with Lagrangian particle models. Atmos Environ 32(7):1157–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anfossi D, Tinarelli G, Trini Castelli S, Nibart M, Olry C, Commanay J (2010) A new Lagrangian particle model for the simulation of dense gas dispersion. Atmos Environ 44:753–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armand P, Bartzis J, Baumann-Stanzer K, Bemporad E, Evertz S, Gariazzo C, Gerbec M, Herring S, Karppinen A, Lacome JM, Reisin T, Tavares R, Tinarelli G, Trini Castelli S (2015) Best practice guidelines for the use of the atmospheric dispersion models in emergency response tools at local-scale in case of hazmat releases into the air. Tech Rep, COST Action ES 1006

  • Baumann-Stantzer K, Andronopoulos S, Armand P, Berbekar E, Efthimiou G, Fuka V, Gariazzo C, Gasparac G, Harms F, Hellsten A, Jurcakova K, Petrov A, Rakai A, Stenzel S, Tavares R, Tinarelli G, Trini Castelli S (2015) Model evaluation case studies: approach and results. Tech Rep, COST Action ES 1006

  • Brown MJ, Williams M (1998) An urban canopy parameterization for mesoscale meteorological models. In: Proceedings of the American meteorological society conference on second urban environment symposium, 2–7 November, 1998, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

  • Camelli FE, Hanna SR, Lohner R (2004) Simulation of the MUST field experiment using the FEFLO-urban CFD model. In: Fifth symposium on the urban environment, American Meteorological Society, 23–26 August, 2004, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Chang JC, Hanna SR (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 87:167–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson KL, Carter RG, Lacroix DJ, Biltoft CA, Hukari NF, Johnson RC, Rich JD (2005) Joint Urban 2003 (JU03) SF6 atmospheric tracer field tests. NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Tech Rep OARARL-254

  • Gowardhan AA, Pardyjak ER, Senocak I, Brown MJ (2011) A CFD-based wind solver for urban response transport and dispersion model. Environ Fluid Mech 11:439–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR (1994) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Tech Note NCAR/TN-398 + STR

  • Halvorson S, Liu Y, Sheu RS, Basara J, Bowers J, Warner T, Swerdlin S (2004) Mesoscale and urban-scale modeling support for the Oklahoma City Joint-Urban 2003 field program. In: Symposium on planning, nowcasting and forecasting in the urban zone, American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, 10–15 January, 2004, Seattle, Washington, USA

  • Hanna S, Baja E (2009) A simple urban dispersion model tested with tracer data from Oklahoma City and Manhattan. Atmos Environ 43:778–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna SR, Chang JC (2012) Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys 116:133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna SR, Briggs GA, Hosker Jr RP (1982) Handbook on atmospheric diffusion. Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Lab, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. Tech Rep DOE/TIC-11223

  • Hanna SR, Brown MJ, Camelli FE, Chan S, Coirier WJ, Hansen OR, Huber AH, Kim S, Reynolds RM (2006) Detailed simulations of atmospheric flow and dispersion in urban downtown areas by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models—an application of five CFD models to Manhattan. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:1713–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S, White J, Zhou Y (2007) Observed winds, turbulence and dispersion in built-up downtown areas in Oklahoma City and Manhattan. Bound-Layer Meteorol 125:441–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna S, White J, Trolier J, Vernot R, Brown M, Gowardhan A, Kaplan H, Alexander Y, Moussafir J, Wang Y, Williamson C (2011) Comparisons of JU2003 observations with four diagnostic urban wind flow and Lagrangian particle dispersion models. Atmos Environ 45(24):4073–4081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwig D (2008) Dispersion in an urban environment with a focus on puff releases. Study Project, Meteorological Institute, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

  • Kaplan H, Dinar N (1996) A Lagrangian dispersion model for calculating concentration distribution within a built-up domain. Atmos Environ 30(24):4197–4207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Chen F, Warner T, Basara J (2006) Verification of a meso-scale data-assimilation and forecasting system for the Oklahoma City area during the Joint Urban 2003 field project. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45(7):912–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh CA, Carruthers DJ, Edmunds HA (1997) ADMS-Urban: an air quality management system for traffic, domestic and industrial pollution. Int J Environ Pollut 8:666–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldrini O, Olry C, Moussafir J, Armand P, Duchenne C (2011) Development of PMSS, the Parallel Version of Micro SWIFT SPRAY. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, 2–6 October, 2011, Kos, Greece

  • Oldrini O, Nibart M, Armand P, Olry C, Moussafir J, Albergel A (2014) Introduction of momentum equations in Micro-SWIFT. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, 6–9 May, 2014, Madrid, Spain

  • Oldrini O, Nibart M, Duchenne C, Armand P, Moussafir J (2016) Development of the parallel version of a CFD – RANS flow model adapted to the fast response in built-up environments. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, 9–12 May, 2016, Budapest, Hungary

  • Oldrini O, Armand P, Duchenne C, Olry C, Tinarelli G (2017) Description and preliminary validation of the PMSS fast response parallel atmospheric flow and dispersion solver in complex built-up areas. J Environ Fluid Mech 17(3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik G, Boris JP, Grinstein FF, Iselin JP (2003) Large scale urban simulation with the MILES approach. Annual American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics CFD conference, 23–26 June, 2003, Orlando, Florida, USA, AIAA Paper 2003-4104

  • Röckle R (1990) Bestimmung der Strömungsverhaltnisse im Bereich komplexer Bebauungs-strukturen. Dissertation, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany (in German)

  • Rodean HC (1996) Stochastic Lagrangian models of turbulent diffusion. American Meteorological Society, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzmann M, Leitl B (2011) Issues with validation of urban flow and dispersion CFD models. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn 99(4):169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulman LL, Strimaitis DG, Scire JS (2000) Development and evaluation of the PRIME plume rise and building downwash model. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 5(3):378–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulhac L, Salizzoni P, Cierco FX, Perkins R (2011) The model SIRANE for atmospheric urban pollutant dispersion—Part I: presentation of the model. Atmos Environ 45(39):7379–7395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulhac L, Lamaison G, Cierco FX, Ben Salem N, Salizzoni P, Mejean P, Armand P, Patryl L (2016) SIRANERISK: modelling dispersion of steady and unsteady pollutant releases in the urban canopy. Atmos Environ 140:242–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes RI, Parker SF, Henn DS, Cerasoli CP, Santos LP (2000) PC-SCIPUFF Version 1.3—technical documentation. ARAP Report No. 725. Titan Corporation, ARAP Group

  • Thomson DJ (1987) Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech 180:529–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinarelli G, Anfossi D, Brusasca G, Ferrero E, Giostra U, Morselli MG, Moussafir J, Tampieri F, Trombetti F (1994) Lagrangian particle simulation of tracer dispersion in the lee of a schematic two-dimensional hill. J Appl Meteorol 33(6):744–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinarelli G, Brusasca G, Oldrini O, Anfossi D, Trini Castelli S, Moussafir J (2007) Micro-Swift-Spray (MSS): a new modelling system for the simulation of dispersion at microscale—general description and validation. In: Borrego C, Norman AN (eds) Air poll modelling and its applications XVII. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 449–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinarelli G, Mortarini L, Trini Castelli S, Carlino G, Moussafir J, Olry C, Armand P, Anfossi D (2013) Review and validation of Micro-Spray, a Lagrangian particle model of turbulent dispersion. In: Lagrangian modeling of the atmosphere, geophysical monograph, American Geophysical Union (AGU), vol 200, pp 311–327

  • Zhou Y, Hanna SR (2007) Along-wind dispersion of puffs released in a built-up urban area. Bound-Layer Meteorol 125:469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Oldrini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oldrini, O., Armand, P. Validation and Sensitivity Study of the PMSS Modelling System for Puff Releases in the Joint Urban 2003 Field Experiment. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 171, 513–535 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-00424-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-00424-1

Keywords

Navigation