Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 157, Issue 1, pp 61–80 | Cite as

Quantifying the Influence of Random Errors in Turbulence Measurements on Scalar Similarity in the Atmospheric Surface Layer

  • Kang Sun
  • Dan Li
  • Lei Tao
  • Zhongkuo Zhao
  • Mark A. Zondlo
Article

Abstract

The influence of random errors in turbulence measurements on scalar similarity for temperature, water vapour, \(\hbox {CO}_{2}\), and \(\hbox {NH}_{3}\) is investigated using two eddy-covariance datasets collected over a lake and a cattle feedlot. Three measures of scalar similarity, namely, the similarity constant in the flux–variance relationship, the correlation coefficient between two scalars and the relative transport efficiency, are examined. The uncertainty in the similarity constant \(C_{s}\) in the flux–variance relationship resulting from random errors in turbulence measurements is quantified based on error propagation analyses and a Monte-Carlo sampling method, which yields a distribution instead of a single value for \(C_{s}\). For different scalars, the distributions of \(C_{s}\) are found to significantly overlap, implying that scalars are transported similarly under strongly unstable conditions. The random errors in the correlation coefficients between scalars and the relative transport efficiencies are also quantified through error propagation analyses, and they increase as the atmosphere departs from neutral conditions. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients between three scalars (water vapour, \(\hbox {CO}_{2}\), and \(\hbox {NH}_{3}\)) are statistically different from unity while the relative transport efficiencies are not, which highlights the difference between these two measures of scalar similarity. The results suggest that uncertainties in these measures of scalar similarity need to be quantified when using them to diagnose the existence of dissimilarity among different scalars.

Keywords

Eddy-covariance fluxes Flux–variance relationship  Monin–Obukhov similarity Random errors Scalar similarity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the research group of Azer Yalin at Colorado State University for providing laboratory space and Jay Ham, Kira Shonkwiler, Christina Nash for the set-up and operation of the tower at the feedlot site. The feedlot work was supported by the Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment (MIRTHE) under National Science Foundation Grant No. EEC-0540832. Kang Sun acknowledges support by a NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship (NN12AN64H). Dan Li acknowledges support from the NOAA (U.S. Department of Commerce) Grant NA08OAR4320752 and the Carbon Mitigation Initiative at Princeton University, sponsored by British Petroleum. Zhongkuo Zhao acknowledges support from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA11010403). The statements, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NOAA, the U.S. Department of Commerce or British Petroleum. The lake dataset was kindly provided by the Environmental Fluid Mechanics and Hydrology Laboratory of Prof. Marc Parlange at The École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne.

References

  1. Asanuma J, Brutsaert W (1999) Turbulence variance characteristics of temperature and humidity in the unstable atmospheric surface layer above a variable pine forest. Water Resour Res 35:515–521. doi: 10.1029/1998wr900051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asanuma J, Tamagawa I, Ishikawa H, Ma Y, Hayashi T, Qi Y, Wang J (2007) Spectral similarity between scalars at very low frequencies in the unstable atmospheric surface layer over the Tibetan plateau. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:85–103. doi: 10.1007/s10546-006-9096-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assouline S, Tyler SW, Tanny J, Cohen S, Bou-Zeid E, Parlange M, Katul G (2008) Evaporation from three water bodies of different sizes and climates: measurements and scaling analysis. Adv Water Resour 31:160–172. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum KA, Ham JM, Brunsell NA, Coyne PI (2008) Surface boundary layer of cattle feedlots: implications for air emissions measurement. Agric For Meteorol 148:1882–1893. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bink NJ, Meesters A (1997) Comment on “Estimation of surface heat and momentum fluxes using the flux-variance method above uniform and non-uniform terrain” by Katul et al. (1995). Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84:497–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bou-Zeid E, Vercauteren N, Parlange MB, Meneveau C (2008) Scale dependence of subgrid-scale model coefficients: an a priori study. Phys Fluids 20:115106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brutsaert W (1982) Evaporation into the atmosphere: theory, history, and applications. Reidel, Dordrecht, 299 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Burba G, Mcdermitt DK, Grelle A, Anderson D, Xu L (2008) Addressing the influence of instrument surface heat exchange on the measurements of \(\rm {CO}_{2}\) flux from open-path gas analyzers. Glob Chang Biol 14:1854–1876. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01606.x
  9. Cancelli DM, Dias NL, Chamecki M (2012) Dimensionless criteria for the production-dissipation equilibrium of scalar fluctuations and their implications for scalar similarity. Water Resour Res. doi: 10.1029/2012WR012127
  10. Cava D, Katul G, Sempreviva AM, Giostra U, Scrimieri A (2008) On the anomalous behaviour of scalar flux-variance similarity functions within the canopy sub-layer of a dense alpine forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 128:33–57. doi: 10.1007/s10546-008-9276-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Bruin HAR, Van Den Hurk B, Kroon LJM (1999) On the temperature-humidity correlation and similarity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 93:453–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Detto M, Katul G, Mancini M, Montaldo N, Albertson J (2008) Surface heterogeneity and its signature in higher-order scalar similarity relationships. Agric For Meteorol 148:902–916. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dias NL (2013) Research on atmospheric turbulence by Wilfried Brutsaert and collaborators. Water Resour Res 49:7169–7184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dias NL, Brutsaert W (1996) Similarity of scalars under stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dick EJ (2004) Beyond “lognormal versus gamma”: discrimination among error distributions for generalized linear models. Fish Res 70:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Firth D (1988) Multiplicative errors: log-normal or gamma? J R Stat Soc Ser B 50:266–268Google Scholar
  17. Foken T, Wichura B (1996) Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 78:83–105. doi: 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02248-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo X, Zhang H, Cai X, Kang L, Zhu T, Leclerc M (2009) Flux-variance method for latent heat and carbon dioxide fluxes in unstable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:363–384. doi: 10.1007/s10546-009-9377-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartogensis OK, De Bruin HAR (2005) Monin–Obukhov similarity functions of the structure parameter of temperature and turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116:253–276. doi: 10.1007/s10546-004-2817-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill RJ (1989) Implications of Monin–Obukhov similarity theory for scalar quantities. J Atmos Sci 46:2236–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Högström U, Smedman-Högström A-S (1974) Turbulence mechanisms at an agricultural site. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hsieh C, Katul G, Chi T (2000) An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv Water Resour 23:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh C-I, Lai M-C, Hsia Y-J, Chang T-J (2008) Estimation of sensible heat, water vapor, and \(\rm {CO}_{2}\) fluxes using the flux-variance method. Int J Biometeorol 52:521–533. doi: 10.1007/s00484-008-0149-4
  24. Kader BA, Yaglom AM (1990) Mean fields and fluctuation moments in unstably stratified turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 212:637–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katul G, Goltz SM, Hsieh C-I, Cheng Y, Mowry F, Sigmon J (1995) Estimation of surface heat and momentum fluxes using the flux-variance method above uniform and non-uniform terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 74:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katul G, Hsieh C-I (1997) Reply to the comment by Bink and Meesters. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katul G, Hsieh C-I, Oren R, Ellsworth D, Phillips N (1996) Latent and sensible heat flux predictions from a uniform pine forest using surface renewal and flux variance methods. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80:249–282Google Scholar
  28. Katul G, Hsieh C-I (1999) A note on the flux-variance similarity relationships for heat and water vapour in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katul G, Parlange MB (1994) On the active role of temperature in surface-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 51:2181–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Katul G, Sempreviva AM, Cava D (2008) The temperature-humidity covariance in the marine surface layer: a one-dimensional analytical model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126:263–278. doi: 10.1007/s10546-007-9236-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamaud E, Irvine M (2006) Temperature-humidity dissimilarity and heat-to-water-vapour transport efficiency above and within a pine forest canopy: the role of the Bowen ratio. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120:87–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee X, Yu Q, Sun X, Liu J, Min Q, Liu Y, Zhang X (2004) Micrometeorological fluxes under the influence of regional and local advection: a revisit. Agric For Meteorol 122:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li D, Bou-Zeid E (2011) Coherent structures and the dissimilarity of turbulent transport of momentum and scalars in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:243–262. doi: 10.1007/s10546-011-9613-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li D, Bou-Zeid E, De Bruin HAR (2012) Monin–Obukhov similarity functions for the structure parameters of temperature and humidity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 145:45–67. doi: 10.1007/s10546-011-9660-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lumley JL, Panofsky HA (1964) The structure of atmospheric turbulence. Interscience Publishers, New York, 239 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin ST, Hung H-M, Park RJ, Jacob D, Spurr R, Chance K, Chin M (2004) Effects of the physical state of tropospheric ammonium-sulfate-nitrate particles on global aerosol direct radiative forcing. Atmos Chem Phys 4:183–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDermitt D, Burba G, Xu L, Anderson T, Komissarov A, Riensche B, Schedlbauer J, Starr G, Zona D, Oechel W, Oberbauer S, Hastings S (2011) A new low-power, open-path instrument for measuring methane flux by eddy covariance. Appl Phys B 102:391–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McNaughton KG, Laubach J (1998) Unsteadiness as a cause of non-equality of eddy diffusivities for heat and vapour at the base of an advective inversion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88:479–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller DJ, Sun K, Tao L, A Khan, Zondlo M (2014) Open-path, quantum cascade-laser-based sensor for high-resolution atmospheric ammonia measurements. Atmos Meas Tech 7:81–93. doi: 10.5194/amt-7-81-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moene AF, Schuttemeyer D (2008) The effect of surface heterogeneity on the temperature-humidity correlation and the relative transport efficiency. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129:99–113. doi: 10.1007/s10546-008-9312-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Monin AS, Obukhov AM (1954) Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the ground layer of the atmosphere. Akad Nauk SSSR, Geofiz Inst Tr 151:163–187Google Scholar
  42. Monin AS, Yaglom AM (1975) Statistical fluid mechanics. MIT Press, Cambridge, 874 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Moore CJ (1986) Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 37:17–35. doi: 10.1007/BF00122754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Owen K, Es-sebbar E, Farooq A (2013) Measurements of \(\rm {NH}_{3}\) linestrengths and collisional broadening coefficients in \(\rm {N}_{2}, \rm {O}_{2}, \rm {CO}_{2}\), and \(\rm {H}_{2}\rm {O}\) near \(1103.46\rm {cm}^{-1}\). J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 121:56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2013.02.001
  45. Roy AA, Adams PJ, Robinson AL (2014) Air pollutant emissions from the development, production, and processing of Marcellus Shale natural gas. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 64:19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Salesky ST, Chamecki M (2012) Random errors in turbulence measurements in the atmospheric surface layer: implications for Monin–Obukhov similarity theory. J Atmos Sci 69:3700–3714. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-12-096.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Salesky ST, Chamecki M, Dias NL (2012) Estimating the random error in eddy-covariance based fluxes and other turbulence statistics: the filtering method. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 144:113–135. doi: 10.1007/s10546-012-9710-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sempreviva AM, Hojstrup J (1998) Transport of temperature and humidity variance and covariance in the marine surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87:233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shen H, Huang Y, Wang R, Zhu D, Li W, Shen G, Wang B, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Lu Y, Chen H, Li T, Sun K, Li B, Liu W, Liu J, Tao S (2013) Global atmospheric emissions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from 1960 to 2008 and future predictions. Environ Sci Technol 47:6415–6424. doi: 10.1021/es400857z Google Scholar
  50. Shindell DT, Faluvegi G, Koch DM, Schmidt GA, Unger N, Bauer SE (2009) Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 326:716–718. doi: 10.1126/science.1174760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stensrud DJ (2007) Parameterization schemes: keys to understanding numerical weather prediction models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 459 ppGoogle Scholar
  52. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Sun K, Tao L, Miller DJ, Khan M, Zondlo M (2014) On-road ammonia emissions characterized by mobile, open-path measurements. Environ Sci Technol 48:3943–3950. doi: 10.1021/es4047704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vercauteren N, Bou-Zeid E, Parlange MB, Lemmin U, Huwald H, Selker J, Meneveau C (2008) Subgrid-scale dynamics of water vapour, heat, and momentum over a lake. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 128:205–228. doi: 10.1007/s10546-008-9287-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams CA, Scanlon TM, Albertson JD (2007) Influence of surface heterogeneity on scalar dissimilarity in the roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao Z, Gao Z, Li D, Bi X, Liu C, Liao F (2013) Scalar flux-gradient relationships under unstable conditions over water in coastal regions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 148:495–516. doi: 10.1007/s10546-013-9829-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kang Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dan Li
    • 3
  • Lei Tao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhongkuo Zhao
    • 4
    • 5
  • Mark A. Zondlo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Center for Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the EnvironmentNSF-ERCPrincetonUSA
  3. 3.Program of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology/Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Numerical Weather PredictionChina Meteorology AdministrationGuangzhouChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of Severe WeatherChinese Academy of Meteorological SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations