Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 148, Issue 2, pp 285–308 | Cite as

Coherent Structures at a Forest Edge: Properties, Coupling and Impact of Secondary Circulations

  • Fabian Eder
  • Andrei Serafimovich
  • Thomas Foken


Little is known about the influence of coherent structures on the exchange process, mainly in the case of forest edges. Thus, in the framework of the ExchanGE processes in mountainous Regions (EGER) project, measurements of atmospheric turbulence were taken at different heights between a forest and an adjacent clear cutting using sonic anemometers and high-frequency optical gas analyzers. From these turbulence data, dominant coherent structures were extracted using an already existing wavelet methodology, which was developed for homogeneous forest canopies. The aim of this study is to highlight differences in properties of coherent structures between a forest and a clear cutting. Distinct features of coherent exchange at the forest edge are presented and a careful investigation of vertical and horizontal coupling by coherent structures around the surface heterogeneity is made. Within the forest, coherent structures are less frequent but possess larger time scales, indicating that only the largest coherent motions can penetrate through the forest canopy. At the forest edge, there is no crown layer that can hinder the vertical exchange of coherent structures, because these exhibit similar time scales at all heights. In contradiction to that, no improved vertical coupling was detected at the forest edge. This is mainly because the structures captured by the applied routine contribute less to total turbulent fluxes at the edge than within the forest. Thus, coherent structures with time scales between 10 and 40 s are not the dominant exchange mechanism at the forest edge. With respect to the horizontal direction, a consistent picture of coherent transport could be derived: along the forest edge there is mainly good coupling by coherent structures, whereas perpendicular to the forest edge there is mainly decoupling. Finally, it was found that there is a systematic modulation of coherent structures directly at the forest edge: strong ejection motions appear in all time series during the daytime, whereas strong sweeps dominate at night. An effect of wind direction relative to the forest edge is excluded. Consequently, it is hypothesized that this might be an indication of a quasi-stationary secondary circulation above the clear cutting that develops due to differences in surface temperature and roughness. Such circulations might be a relevant turbulent transport mechanism for ecosystem-atmosphere exchange in heterogeneous landscapes.


Coherent structures Coupling processes Forest edge Wavelet analysis 



This research was funded within the DFG PAK 446 project, mainly the subproject FO 226/21-1. The authors thank all participants of the experiment, especially J. Hübner, R. Eigenmann, H. Liu and S. Cieslik for their support during the field measurements.


  1. Amiro BD (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within three boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 51:99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonia RA (1981) Conditional sampling in turbulence measurement. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:131–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubinet M, Feigenwinter C, Heinesch B, Bernhofer C, Canepa E, Lindroth A, Montagnani L, Rebmann C, Sedlak P, Van Gorsel E (2010) Direct advection measurements do not help to solve the night-time \(\text{ CO }_2\) closure problem: evidence from three different forests. Agric For Meteorol 150:655–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Rannik Ü, Moncrieff J, Foken T, Kowalski AS, Martin PH, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Clement R, Elbers J, Granier A, Grünwald T, Morgenstern K, Pilegaard K, Rebmann C, Snijders W, Valentini R, Vesala T (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Adv Ecolog Res 30:113–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubinet M, Heinesch B, Yernaux M (2003) Horizontal and vertical \(\text{ CO }_2\) advection in a sloping forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 108:397–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP (1988) A spectral and lag-correlation analysis of turbulence in a deciduous forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 45:31–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barthlott C, Drobinski P, Fesquet C, Dubos T, Pietras C (2007) Long-term study of coherent structures in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergström H, Högström U (1989) Turbulent exchange above a pine forest II. Organized structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 49:231–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantwell BJ (1981) Organized motion in turbulent flow. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:457–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassiani M, Katul GG, Albertson JD (2008) The effects of canopy leaf area index on airflow across forest edges: large-eddy simulation and analytical results. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 126:433–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cava D, Giostra U, Siqueira M, Katul G (2004) Organised motion and radiative perturbations in the nocturnal canopy sublayer above an even-aged pine forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112:129–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cellier P, Brunet Y (1992) Flux-gradient relationships above tall plant canopies. Agric For Meteorol 58:93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collineau S, Brunet Y (1993a) Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a forest canopy part I: wavelet analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 65:357–379Google Scholar
  14. Collineau S, Brunet Y (1993b) Detection of turbulent coherent motions in a forest canopy part II: time-scales and conditional averages. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 66:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Denmead OT, Bradley EF (1985) Flux-gradient relationships in a forest canopy. In: Hutchinson BA, Hicks BB (eds) The forest-atmosphere interaction. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 421–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denmead OT, Bradley EF (1987) On scalar transport in plant canopies. Irrig Sci 8:131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Detto M, Katul GG, Siqueira M, Juang JY, Stoy P (2008) The structure of turbulence near a tall forest edge: the backward-facing step flow analogy revisted. Ecol Appl 18:1420–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dupont S, Brunet Y (2009) Coherent structures in canopy edge flow: a large-eddy simulation study. J Fluid Mech 630:93–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupont S, Irvine M, Bonnefond JM, Lamaud E, Brunet Y (2012) Turbulent structures in a pine forest with a deep and sparse trunk space: stand and edge regions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fazu C, Schwerdtfeger P (1989) Flux-gradient relationships for momentum and heat over a rough natural surface. Q J R Meteorol Soc 115:335–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feigenwinter C, Vogt R (2005) Detection and analysis of coherent structures in urban turbulence. Theor Appl Climatol 81:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finnigan J (1979) Turbulence in waving wheat. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 16:213–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Foken T (2008a) Micrometeorology. Springer, Heidelberg, p 308Google Scholar
  25. Foken T (2008b) The energy balance closure problem: an overview. Ecol Appl 18:1351–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Foken T, Leuning R, Oncley SR, Mauder M, Aubinet M (2012a) Corrections and data quality control. In: Aubinet M, Vesala T, Papale D (eds) Eddy covariance: a practical guide to measurement and data analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 85–131Google Scholar
  27. Foken T, Meixner FX, Falge E, Zetzsch C, Serafimovich A, Bargsten A, Behrendt T, Biermann T, Breuninger C, Dix S, Gerken T, Hunner M, Lehmann-Pape L, Hens K, Jocher G, Kesselmeier J, Lüers J, Mayer J-C, Moravek A, Plake D, Riederer M, Rütz F, Scheibe M, Siebicke L, Sörgel M, Staudt K, Trebs I, Tsokankunku A, Welling M, Wolff V, Zhu Z (2012b) Coupling processes and exchange of energy and reactive and non-reactive trace gases at a forest site: results of the EGER experiment. Atmos Chem Phys 12:1923–1950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foufoula-Georgiou E, Kumar P (1994) Wavelet analysis in geophysics: an introduction. In: Foufoula-Georgiou E, Kumar P (eds) Wavelets in geophysics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  29. Gao W, Shaw RH, Paw UKT (1989) Observation of organized structure in turbulent flow within and above a forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 47:349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garratt JR (1978) Flux profile relations above tall vegetation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 104:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garratt JR (1980) Surface influence upon vertical profiles in the atmospheric near-surface layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:803–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gerstberger P, Foken T, Kalbitz K (2004) The Lehstenbach and Steinkreuz catchments in NE Bavaria, Germany. In: Matzner E (ed) Biogeochemistry of forested catchments in a changing environment: a german case study. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glickman TS (ed) (2000) Glossary of meteorology, 2nd edn. American Meteorological Society, Boston, p 855Google Scholar
  34. Goeckede M, Thomas C, Markkanen T, Mauder M, Ruppert J, Foken T (2007) Sensitivity of Lagrangian stochastic footprints to turbulence statistics. Tellus B 59:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossmann A, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J (1989) Reading and understanding continous wavelet transforms. In: Combes JM, Grossmann A, Tchamitchian P (eds) Wavelets: time-frequency methods and phase space. Springer, New York, pp 2–20Google Scholar
  36. Grossmann A, Morlet J (1984) Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J Math Anal 15:723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harman I, Finnigan J (2007) A simple unified theory for flow in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:339–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harman I, Finnigan J (2008) Scalar concentration profiles in the canopy and roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holmes P, Lumley JL, Berkooz G (1996) Turbulence, coherent structures, dynamical systems and symmetry. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang J, Cassiani M, Albertson J (2011) Coherent turbulent structures across a vegetation discontinuity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Inagaki A, Castillo M, Yamashita Y, Kanda M, Takimoto H (2012) Large-eddy simulation of coherent flow structures within a cubical canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Katul G, Poggi D, Cava D, Finnigan J (2006) The relative importance of ejections and sweeps to momentum transfer in the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120:367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klaassen W, Breugel PB, Moors EJ, Nieveen JP (2002) Increased heat fluxes near a forest edge. Theor Appl Climatol 72:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kline SJ, Reynolds WC, Schraub FA, Runstadler PW (1967) The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 30:741–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J, Grossmann A (1987) Analysis of sound patterns through wavelet transforms. Int J Pattern Recog 1:273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leclerc MY, Karipot A, Prabha T, Allwine G, Lamb B, Gholz HL (2003) Impact of non-local advection on flux footprints over a tall forest canopy: a tracer flux experiment. Agric For Meteorol 115:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lu CH, Fitzjarrald DR (1994) Seasonal and diurnal variations of coherent structures over a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 69:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lu SS, Willmarth WW (1973) Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 60:481–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mahrt L (2010) Computing turbulent fluxes near the surface: needed improvements. Agric For Meteorol 150:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Maitani T, Shaw RH (1990) Joint probability analysis of momentum and heat fluxes at a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 52:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paw UKT, Brunet Y, Collineau S, Shaw RH, Maitani T, Qiu J, Hipps L (1992) On coherent structures in turbulence above and within agricultural plant canopies. Agric For Meteorol 61:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sub-layer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:565–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ, Brunet Y (1996) Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:351–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson SK (1991) Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 23:601–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schlegel F, Stiller J, Bienert A, Maas HG, Queck R, Bernhofer C (2012) Large-eddy simulation of inhomogeneous canopy flows using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Serafimovich A, Eder F, Hübner J, Falge E, Voss L, Sörgel M, Held A, Liu Q, Eigenmann R, Huber K, Ferro Duarte H, Werle P, Gast E, Cieslik S, Liu H, and Foken T (2011) ExchanGE processes in mountaineous regions (EGER). Documentation of the intensive oberservation period (IOP3) June, 13th–July, 26th. Arbeitsergebnisse/Department of Micrometeorology, University of Bayreuth. ISSN:1614-8916. no. 47, p 137Google Scholar
  57. Serafimovich A, Thomas C, Foken T (2011b) Vertical and horizontal transport of energy and matter by coherent motions in a tall spruce canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 140:429–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shaw RH, Tavangar J, Ward DP (1983) Structure of the reynolds stress in a canopy layer. J Clim Appl Meteorol 22:1922–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sogachev A, Leclerc MY, Karipot A, Zhang G, Vesala T (2005) Effect of clearcuts on footprints and flux measurements above a forest canopy. Agric For Meteorol 133:182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sogachev A, Leclerc MY, Zhang G, Rannik Ü, Vesala T (2008) \(\text{ CO }_2\) fluxes near a forest edge: a numerical study. Ecol Appl 18:1454–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staebler RM, Fitzjarrald DR (2004) Observing subcanopy \(\text{ CO }_2\) advection. Agric For Meteorol 122:139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Staudt K, Foken T (2007) Documentation of recference data for the experimental areas of the Bayreuth Centre for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER) at the Waldstein site. Arbeitsergebnisse, Department of Micrometeorology, University of Bayreuth. Bayreuth. ISSN:1614–8916, no. 35, p 37Google Scholar
  63. Steiner AL, Pressley SN, Botros A, Jones E, Chung SH, Edburg SL (2012) Analysis of coherent structures and atmosphere-canopy coupling strength during the CABINEX field campaign. Atmos Chem Phys 11:11921–11936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thomas C, Foken T (2005) Detection of long-term coherent exchange over spruce forest using wavelet analysis. Theor Appl Climatol 80:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thomas C, Foken T (2007a) Flux contribution of coherent structures and its implications for the exchange of energy and matter in a tall spruce canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 123:317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thomas C, Foken T (2007b) Organised motion in a tall spruce canopy: temporal scales, structure spacing and terrain effects. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122:123–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas C, Mayer JC, Meixner F, Foken T (2006) Analysis of low-frequency turbulence above tall vegetation using a Doppler sodar. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119:563–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vickers D, Mahrt L (1997) Quality control and flux sampling problems for tower and aircraft data. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 14:512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilczak J, Oncley S, Stage S (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson K, Goldstein A, Falge E, Aubinet M, Baldocchi D, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C, Ceulemans R, Dolman H, Field C, Grelle A, Ibrom A, Law BE, Kowalski A, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Monson R, Oechel W, Tenhunen J, Valentini R, Verma S (2002) Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric For Meteorol 113:223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yang B, Morse A, Shaw R, Paw UKT (2006a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: momentum and turbulent kinetic energy budgets. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121:433–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yang B, Raupach MR, Shaw RH, Paw UKT, Morse AP (2006b) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120:377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zeeman MJ, Eugster W, Thomas CK (2013) Concurrency of coherent structures and conditionally sampled daytime sub-canopy respiration. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang G, Thomas C, Leclerc MY, Karipot A, Gholz HL, Binford M, Foken T (2007) On the effect of clearcuts on turbulence structure above a forest canopy. Theor Appl Climatol 88:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabian Eder
    • 1
    • 2
  • Andrei Serafimovich
    • 1
    • 3
  • Thomas Foken
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of MicrometeorologyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK-IFU)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Garmisch-PartenkirchenGermany
  3. 3.Helmholtz Centre PotsdamGFZ German Research Centre for GeosciencesTelegrafenbergGermany
  4. 4.Member of Bayreuth Centre of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER)University of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations