Evaluation of Statistical Distributions for the Parametrization of Subgrid Boundary-Layer Clouds
- 172 Downloads
In numerical weather prediction and climate models, planetary boundary-layer (PBL) clouds are linked to subgrid-scale processes such as shallow convection. A comprehensive statistical analysis of large-eddy simulations (LES), obtained for warm PBL cloud cases, is carried out in order to characterize the distributions of the horizontal subgrid cloud variability. The production of subgrid clouds is mainly associated with the variability of the total water content. Nevertheless, in the case of PBL clouds, the temperature variability cannot be completely discarded and the saturation deficit, which summarizes both temperature and total water fluctuations, provides a better representation of the cloud variability than the total water content. The probability density functions (PDFs) of LES saturation deficit generally have the shape of a main asymmetric bell-shaped curve with a more or less distinct secondary maximum specific to each type of PBL clouds. Unimodal theoretical PDFs, even those with a flexible skewness, are not sufficient to correctly fit the LES distributions, especially the long tail that appears for cumulus clouds. They do not provide a unified approach for all cloud types. The cloud fraction and the mean cloud water content, diagnosed from these unimodal PDFs, are largely underestimated. The use of a double Gaussian distribution allows correction of these errors on cloud fields and provides a better estimation of the cloud-base and cloud-top heights. Eventually, insights for the design of a subgrid statistical cloud scheme are provided, in particular a new formulation for the weight of the two Gaussian distributions and for the standard deviation of the convective distribution.
KeywordsDouble Gaussian distribution Large-eddy simulations Planetary boundary-layer clouds Probability density function Saturation deficit Statistical cloud scheme
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown AR, Cederwall RT, Chlond A, Duynkerke PG, Golaz JC, Khairoutdinov M, Lewellen DC, Lock AP, Macvean MK, Moeng CH, Neggers RAJ, Siebesma AP, Stevens B (2002) Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 128: 1075–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D (1997) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 39: 1–38Google Scholar
- Hogg RV, Craig AI (2005) Introduction to mathematical statistics. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Jam A, Hourdin F, Rio C, Couvreux F (2010) Vers un modele de nuage pour la representation des cumulus. In: Preprints of Ateliers de Modelisation de l’Atmosphere, Annual meeting, Meteo-France, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
- Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Héreil P, Mascart P, Masson V, Pinty JP, Redelsperger JL, Richard E, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J (1998) The meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part 1: adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann Geophys 16: 90–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lappen CL (1999) The unification of mass flux and higher-order closure in the simulation of boundary layer turbulence. PhD thesis, Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Lenderink G, Siebesma P (2000) Combining the mass-flux approach with a statistical cloud scheme. Proceedings of the 14th symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence. Aspen, Co, USA, pp 66–69Google Scholar
- McLachlan G, Krishnan T (1997) The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, New York, p 274 ppGoogle Scholar
- Raes F, Bates T, McGovern F, Van Liedekerke M (2000) The 2nd aerosol characterization experiment (ACE2): general overview and main results. Tellus 52B: 111–125Google Scholar
- Stephens G, Vane D, Boain R, Mace G, Sassen K,Wang Z, Illingworth A, O’Connor E, RossowW, Durden S, Miller S, Austin R, Benedetti A, Mitrescu C, The CloudSat Science Team (2002) The cloudsat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1771–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Zanten MC, Stevens B, Nuijens L, Siebesma AP, Ackerman AS, Burnet F, Cheng A, Couvreux F, Jiang H, Khairoutdinov M, Kogan Y, Lewellen C, Mechem D, Nakamura K, Noda A, Shipway BJ, Slawinska J, Wang S, Wyszogrodzki A (2011) Controls on precipitation and cloudiness in simulations of trade-wind cumulus as observed during RICO. J Adv Model Earth Syst 3 (in press)Google Scholar