Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 128, Issue 2, pp 277–302 | Cite as

Detection of Flow Distortions and Systematic Errors in Sonic Anemometry Using the Planar Fit Method

  • Renzo Richiardone
  • Elena Giampiccolo
  • Silvia Ferrarese
  • Massimiliano Manfrin
Original Paper

Abstract

We describe the coordinate transformations that can be used to convert the velocity components measured by a set of sonic anemometers with time-dependent tilt fluctuations into a single, time-independent coordinate system. By applying the planar fit method (PFM) to each anemometer dataset, it is possible, for planar flows, to locate the flow plane at each measurement point and compare its orientation with the topography. Installation on a ship is also considered. An application of this method to intercomparison data has led to the detection of an instrument error due to a misalignment between the assembly of the sonic transducers and the anemometer pedestal. If this error occurs, pedestal levelling does not guarantee that measurements are unbiased. A correction method is proposed and the results of two experiments are shown. Flow planarity at different levels and flow distortion caused by the mast are highlighted. The influence of the error on the evaluation of the Reynolds stresses using PFM or the double rotation method and the triple rotation method is discussed and the tilt corrected stresses calculated using the three methods compared.

Keywords

Coordinate systems Positioning error Sonic anemometers Tilt corrections Turbulent flux measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dyer AJ (1981) Flow distortion by supporting structures. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 20: 243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Finnigan JJ (2004) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques. Part II: coordinate systems. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113: 1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finnigan JJ, Clement R, Malhi Y, Leuning R, Cleugh HA (2003) A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques. Part I: averaging and coordinate rotation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107: 1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foken T, Göckede M, Mauder M, Mahrt L, Amiro B, Munger M (2004) Post-field data quality control. In: Lee X, Massman W, Law B (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, chap 9. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 181–208Google Scholar
  5. Geissbühler P, Siegwolf R, Eugster W (2000) Eddy covariance measurements on mountain slopes: the advantage of surface-normal sensor orientation over a vertical set-up. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96: 371–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaimal JC, Finnigan JJ (1994) Atmospheric boundary layer flows. Oxford University Press, New York, 289 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee X (1998) On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 91: 39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee X, Finnigan JJ, Paw U KT (2004) Coordinate systems and flux bias error. In: Lee X, Massman W, Law B (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis, chap. 3. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 33–66Google Scholar
  9. McMillen RT (1988) An eddy correlation technique with extended applicability to non-simple terrain. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 43: 231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paw U KT, Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP, Wilson KB (2000) Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 487–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sun J (2007) Tilt corrections over complex terrain and their implication for CO 2 transport. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124: 143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanner CB, Thurtell GW (1969) Anemoclinometer measurements of reynolds stress and heat transport in the atmospheric surface layer. Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, Research and Development Technical Report ECOM 66-G22-F to the US Army Electronics CommandGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99: 127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renzo Richiardone
    • 1
  • Elena Giampiccolo
    • 1
  • Silvia Ferrarese
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Manfrin
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica GeneraleUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations