Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 57–72 | Cite as

On the Scale-dependence of the Gradient Richardson Number in the Residual Layer

  • Ben B. Balsley
  • Gunilla Svensson
  • Michael Tjernström
Original Paper

Abstract

We present results of a technique for examining the scale-dependence of the gradient Richardson number, Ri, in the nighttime residual layer. The technique makes use of a series of high-resolution, in situ, vertical profiles of wind speed and potential temperature obtained during CASES-99 in south-eastern Kansas, U.S.A. in October 1999. These profiles extended from the surface, through the nighttime stable boundary layer, and well into the residual layer. Analyses of the vertical gradients of both wind speed, potential temperature and turbulence profiles over a wide range of vertical scale sizes are used to estimate profiles of the local Ri and turbulence structure as a function of scale size. The utility of the technique lies both with the extensive height range of the residual layer as well as with the fact that the sub-metre resolution of the raw profiles enables a metre-by-metre ‘sliding’ average of the scale-dependent Richardson number values over hundreds of metres vertically. The results presented here show that small-scale turbulence is a ubiquitous and omnipresent feature of the residual layer, and that the region is dynamic and highly variable, exhibiting persistent turbulent structure on vertical scales of a few tens of metres or less. Furthermore, these scales are comparable to the scales over which the Ri is less than or equal to the critical value of Ri c of 0.25, although turbulence is also shown to exist in regions with significantly larger Ri values, an observation at least consistent with the concept of hysteresis in turbulence generation and maintenance. Insofar as the important scale sizes are comparable to or smaller than the resolution of current models, it follows that, in order to resolve the observed details of small Ri values and the concomitant turbulence generation, future models need to be capable of significantly higher resolutions.

Keywords

Residual layer Scale-dependent Richardson number Shear-generated turbulence Tethered lifting system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angevine WM, Bakwin PS, Davis KJ (1998) Wind profiler and RAQSS measurements compared with measurements from a 450 m tower. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 12: 818–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsley BB, Jensen ML, Frehlich R (1998) The use of state-of-the-art kites for profiling the lower atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balsley BB, Frehlich RG, Jensen ML, Meillier Y, Muschinski A (2003) Extreme gradients in the nocturnal boundary layer: structure, evolution, and potential causes. J Atmos Sci 60: 2496–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balsley BB, Frehlich RG, Jensen ML, Meillier Y (2006) High-resolution in situ profiling through the stable boundary layer: examination of the SBL top in terms of minimum shear, maximum stratification, and turbulence decrease. J Atmos Sci 63: 1291–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banta R, Newsom R, Lundquist J, Pichugina Y, Coulter R, Mahrt L (2002) Nocturnal low-level jet characteristics over Kansas during CASES-99. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 105: 221–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banta R, Pechugina Y, Newsom R (2003) Relationship between low-level jet properties and turbulence kinetic energy in the nocturnal stable boundary layer. J Atmos Sci (Notes and Correspondence) 60: 2549–2555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu S, Porté-agel F, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Vinuesa J-V, Pahlow M (2006) Revisiting the local scaling hypothesis in stably stratified atmospheric boundary-layer turbulence: an integration of field and laboratory measurements with large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119: 473–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandrasekhar S (1961) Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 652Google Scholar
  9. Chimonas G (2002) On internal gravity waves associated with the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 102: 139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohn SA, Angevine WM (2000) Boundary layer height and entrainment zone thickness measured by lidars and wind profiling radars. J Appl Meteorol 39: 1233–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corsmeier U, Kalthoff N, Kolle O, Kotsian M, Fiedler F (1997) Ozone concentration jump in the stable nocturnal boundary layer during a LLF-event. Atmos Environ 31: 1977–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulter R, Doran J (2002) Spatial and temporal occurrences of intermittent turbulence during CASES-99. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 105: 329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coulter R, Kallistratova M (2004) Two decades of progress in SODAR techniques: a review of 11 ISARS proceedings. Meteor Atmos Phys 85: 3–19Google Scholar
  14. Eaton F, Mclaughlin A, Hines JR (1995) A new frequency-modulated continuous wave radar for studying planetary boundary layer morphology. Radio Sci 30: 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fochesatto GJ, Drobinski P, Flamant C, Guedalia D, Sarrat C, Flamant PH, Pelon J (2001) Evidence of dynamical coupling between the residual layer and the developing convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99: 451–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frehlich RG, Meillier Y, Jensen ML, Balsley BB (2003) Turbulence measurements with the CIRES TLS (Tethered Lifting System) during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 60: 2487–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frehlich RG, Meillier Y, Jensen ML, Balsley BB (2004) A statistical description of small-scale turbulence in the low-level nocturnal jet. J Atmos Sci 61: 1079–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritts DC, Nappo C, Riggin CM, Balsley BB, Eichinger WE, Newsom RK (2003) Analysis of ducted motions in the stable nocturnal boundary layer during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 60: 2450–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garratt JR (1994) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Glickman T (ed) (2000) Glossary of meteorology, 2nd edn. Amer Meteor Soc 855 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Gossard EE, Gaynor JE, Zamora RJ, Neff WD (1985) Finestructure of elevated stable layers observed by sounder and in situ tower sensors. J Atmos Sci 42: 2156–2169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hines C (1988) Generation of turbulence by atmospheric waves. J Atmos Sci 45: 1269–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holden J, Derbyshire S, Belcher S (2000) Tethered balloon observations of the nocturnal stable boundary layer in a valley. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobitz F, Surkar S (1998) The effect of nonvertical shear on turbulence in a stably stratified medium. Phys Fluids 10: 1158–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobson MZ (1999) Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling. Cambridge University Press, U.K., 656 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Kolev I, Savov P, Kaprielov B, Parvanov O, Simeonov V (2000) Lidar observation of the nocturnal boundary layer formation over Sofia, Bulgaria. Atmos Environ 34: 3223–3235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahrt L (1999) Stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90: 375–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahrt L, Sun J, Blumen W, Delaney T, Oncley S (1998) Nocturnal boundary layer regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88: 255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mahrt L, Vickers D (2002) Contrasting vertical structures of nocturnal boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103: 351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Majda A, Shefter M (1998a) The instability of stratified flows at large Richardson number. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 7850–7853Google Scholar
  31. Majda A (1998b) Elementary stratified flows with instability at large Richardson number. J Fluid Mech 376: 319–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mauritsen T, Svensson G (2007) Observations of stably stratified shear-driven atmospheric turbulence at low and high richardson numbers. J Atmos Sci 64: 645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meillier Y (2004) Periodic modulation of fine-scale turbulence by gravity waves above the nocturnal boundary layer: experimental validation using in situ measurements. PhD Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 145 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Mengesha YG, Taylor PA, Lenschow DH (2001) Boundary layer turbulence over the Nebraska sand hills. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 100: 3–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miles JW (1961) On the stability of heterogeneous shear flow. J Fluid Mech 10: 496–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muschinski A, Frehlich R, Jensen ML, Hugo R, Hoff A, Eaton F, Balsley BB (2001) Fine-scale measurements of turbulence in the lower troposphere: an intercomparison between a kite- and balloon-borne, and a helicopter-borne measurement system. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98: 219–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muschinski A, Frehlich R, Balsley BB (2004) Small-scale and large-scale intermittency in the boundary layer and residual layer. J Fluid Mech 515: 319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nappo CJ (2002) An introduction to gravity atmospheric waves. International Geophysics Series, 85, Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 279 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Nilsson ED, Rannik U, Kulmala M, Buzorius G, O’Dowd CD (2001) Effects of continental boundary layer evolution, convection, turbulence and entrainment, on aerosol formation. Tellus Series B-Chem Phys Meteorol 53(4): 441–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poulos GS, Blumen W, Fritts DC, Lundquist JK, Sun J, Burns SP, Nappo C, Banta R, Newsom R, Cuxart J, Terradellas E, Balsley BB, Jensen ML (2002) CASES-99: a comprehensive investigation of the stable nocturnal boundary layer. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83: 555–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reitebuch O, Strassburger A, Emeis S, Kuttler W (2000) Nocturnal secondary ozone concentration maxima analysed by sodar observations and surface measurements. Atmos Environ 34: 4215–4329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rohr JJ, Itsweire E, Helland K, Van Atta CW (1988) Growth and decay of turbulence in a stably stratified shear flow. J Fluid Mech 195: 77–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rotach MW, Vogt R, Bernhofer C, Batchverova E, Christen A, Clappier A, Feddersen B, Gryning S-E, Martucci G, Mayer H, Mitev V, Oke TR, Parlow E, Richner H, Roth M, Roulet Y-A, Ruffieux D, Salmond JA, Schatzmann M, Voogt JA (2005) BUBBLE – an urban boundary layer meteorology project. Theor Appl Climatol 81: 231–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Salmond JA, McKendry IG (2002) Secondary ozone maxima in a very stable nocturnal boundary layer: observations from the lower Fraser valley BC. Atmos Environ 36: 5771–5782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siebert H, Wendisch M, Conrath T, Teichmann U, Heintzenberg J (2002) A new tethered balloon-borne payload for fine-scale observations in the cloudy boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 106: 461–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Strauch RG, Campbell WC, Chadwick RB, Moran KP (1976) Microwave FM-CW Doppler radar for boundary layer probing. Geophys Res Lett 3: 193–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stull R (1993) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Vickers D, Mahrt L (2003) The co-spectral gap and turbulent flux calculations. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 20: 660–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yi C, Davis KJ, Berger BW, Bakwin PS (2001) Long-term observations of the dynamics of the continental planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 58: 1288–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zang J, Rao ST (1999) The role of vertical mixing in the temporal evolution of ground-level ozone concentrations. J Appl Meteorol 38: 1674–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben B. Balsley
    • 1
  • Gunilla Svensson
    • 2
  • Michael Tjernström
    • 2
  1. 1.Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)University of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of MeteorologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations