Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 126, Issue 3, pp 433–460 | Cite as

The Effects of Canopy Leaf Area Index on Airflow Across Forest Edges: Large-eddy Simulation and Analytical Results

  • M. Cassiani
  • G. G. Katul
  • J. D. Albertson
Original Paper

Abstract

The structure of turbulent flows along a transition between tall-forested canopies and forest clearings continues to be an active research topic in canopy turbulence. The difficulties in describing the turbulent flow along these transitions stem from the fact that the vertical structure of the canopy and its leaf area distribution cannot be ignored or represented by an effective roughness length. Large-eddy simulation (LES) runs were performed to explore the effect of a homogeneous variation in the forest leaf area index (LAI) on the turbulent flow across forest edges. A nested grid numerical method was used to ensure the development of a deep boundary layer above the forest while maintaining a sufficiently high resolution in the region close to the ground. It was demonstrated that the LES here predicted first-order and second-order mean velocity statistics within the canopy that agree with reported Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model results, field and laboratory experiments. In the simulations reported here, the LAI was varied between 2 and 8 spanning a broad range of observed LAI in terrestrial ecosystems. By increasing the forest LAI, the mean flow properties both within the forest and in the clearing near the forest edge were altered in two fundamental ways: near the forest edge and into the clearing, the flow statistical properties resembled the so-called back-facing step (BFS) flow with a mean recirculation zone near the edge. Another recirculation zone sets up downstream of the clearing as the flow enters the tall forest canopy. The genesis of this within-forest recirculation zone can be primarily described using the interplay between the mean pressure gradients (forcing the flow) and the drag force (opposing the flow). Using the LES results, a simplified analytical model was also proposed to explain the location of the recirculation zone inside the canopy and its dependence on the forest LAI. Furthermore, a simplified scaling argument that decomposes the mean velocity at the outflow edge into a superposition of ‘exit flow’ and BFS-like flow with their relative importance determined by LAI was explored.

Keywords

Back-facing step flow Boundary layer Exit flow Forest edge Large-eddy simulations Recirculation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albertson JD (1996) Large-eddy simulation of Land–Atmosphere Interaction. Ph.D. thesis, university of California Davis, 185 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Albertson JD, Parlange MB (1999a) Surface length scales and shear stress: implications for land–atmosphere interaction over complex terrain. Water Resour Res 35: 2121–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertson JD, Parlange MB (1999b) Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain. Adv Water Resour 23: 239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albertson JD, Katul , Wiberg P (2001) Relative importance of local and regional controls on coupled water, carbon, and energy fluxes. Adv Water Resour 24(9–10): 1103–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amiro BD (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within 3 Boreal forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 51: 99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antonia RA, Luxton RE (1974) Characteristics of turbulence within an internal boundary layer. In: Frenkiel FN, Munn RE (eds) Turbulent diffusion in environmental pollution (Adv. Geophys. 18A). Academic Press, pp 263–285Google Scholar
  7. Armali F, Durst F, Pereira JCF, Schonung B (1983) Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward facing step flow. J Fluid Mech 127: 473–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asner GP, Jonathan MO, Hicke JA (2003) Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12(3): 191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergen JD (1975) Air movement in a forest clearing as indicated by smoke drift. Agric Meteorol 15: 165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canuto C, Hussaini MY, Quarteroni A, Zang TA (1988) Spectral methods in fluid dynamics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 557 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassiani M, Radicchi A, Giostra U (2005) Probability density function modelling of concentration in and above a canopy layer. Agric For Meteorol 133: 153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassiani M, Radicchi A, Albertson JD (2007a) Modelling of concentration fluctuations in canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122(3): 655–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassiani M, Radicchi A, Albertson JD, Giostra U (2007b) An efficient algorithm for scalar PDF modelling in incompressible turbulent flow; numerical analysis with evaluation of IEM and IECM micro-mixing models. J Comp Phys 223(2): 519–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen JM, Clack TA, Novak MD, Adams RS (1995) A wind tunnel study of turbulent airflow in forest clear cuts. In: Coutts MP, Grace J (eds) Wind and Trees, Chap. 4. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Chun KB, Sung HJ (1998) Visualization of a locally-forced separated flow over a backward-facing step. Exp Fluids 25: 133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dejoan A, Leschziner MA (2004) Large-eddy simulation of periodically perturbed separated flow over a backward-facing step. Int J Heat Fluid Fl 25: 581–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deardorff JW (1970) A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. Investigations of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 41: 453–465Google Scholar
  18. Deardorff JW (1972) Numerical investigations of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 29: 91–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Detto M, Katul GG, Siqueira MB, Juang J-Y, Stoy P (2007) The structure of turbulence near a tall forest edge: the backward facing step flow analogy revisited. Ecol Appl (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Dwyer MJ, Patton EG, Shaw RH (1997) Turbulent kinetic energy budgets from a large-eddy simulation of airflow above and within a forest canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84: 23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellsworth DS, Oren R, Huang C, Phillips N, Hendrey RH (1995) Leaf and canopy responses to elevated CO2 in a pine forest under free-air CO2 enrichment. Oecologia 104: 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flesch TK, Wilson JD (1999) Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocks. I. Measured winds in experimental cutblocks. Agric For Meteorol 93: 229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furuichi N, Hachiga T, Kumada M (2004) An experimental investigation of a large-scale structure of a two-dimensional backward-facing step by using advanced multi-point LDV. Exp Fluids 36: 274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garratt JR (1990) The internal boundary layer: a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 50: 171–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Germano M (1992) Turbulence: the filtering approach. J Fluid Mech 238: 325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot WH (1991) A dynamical subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A 3(7): 1760–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gullbrand J, Chow FK (2003) The effect of numerical errors and turbulence models in large-eddy simulations of channel flow, with and without explicit filtering. J Fluid Mech 495: 323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holland JZ (1989) On pressure-driven wind in deep forests. J Appl Meteorol 28: 1349–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Irvine MR, Gardiner BA, Hill MK (1997) The evolution of turbulence across a forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 84: 467–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Judd MJ, Raupach MR, Finnigan JJ (1996) A wind tunnel study of turbulent flow around single and multiple windbreaks. 1. Velocity fields. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80(1–2): 127–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaltenbach HJ (1997) Cell aspect ratio dependence of anisotropy measures for resolved and subgrid scale stresses. J Comput Phys 136(2): 399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Katul GG, Albertson JD (1998) An investigation of higher-order closure models for a forested canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 89(1): 47–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Katul GG, Chang WH (1999) Principal length scales in second-order closure models for canopy turbulence. J Appl Meteorol 38: 1631–1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Katul GG, Leuning R, Kim J, Denmead OT, Miyata A, Harazono Y (2001) Estimating CO2 Source/Sink distributions within a rice canopy using higher-order closure models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 98: 103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Katul GG, Mahrt L, Poggi , Sanz C (2004) One and two equation models for canopy turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 113: 81–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Katul GG, Porporato A, Nathan R, Siqueira M, Soons MB, Poggi D, Horn HS, Levin SA (2005) Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Amer Nat 166: 369–376Google Scholar
  37. Khanna S, Brasseur JG (1997) Analysis of Monin-Obukhov similarity from large-eddy simulation. J Fluid Mech 345: 251–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klaassen W (1992) Average fluxes from heterogeneous vegetated regions. Boundary-layer Meteorol 58: 329–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kostas J, Soria J, Chong MS (2002) Particle image velocimetry measurements of a backward-facing step flow. Exp Fluids 33: 838–853Google Scholar
  40. Kosovic B (1997) Subgrid-scale modelling for the large-eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 336: 151–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laurence W (2004) Forest–Climate interactions in fragmented tropical landscapes. Phil Trans Roy Soc London 359: 345–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lesieur M, Metais O, Comte P (2005) Large-eddy simulation of turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 219 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Li Z, Lin JD, Miller DR (1990) Air flow over and trough a forest edge: steady state numerical simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 51: 179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu J, Chen JM, Black TA, Novak MD (1996) E-ε modelling of turbulent air flow downwind of a model forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 77: 21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mason PJ, Thomson DJ (1987) Large-eddy simulations of the neutral-static-stability planetary boundary layer. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 113(476): 413–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mason PJ, Thomson DJ (1992) Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulation of boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 242: 51–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meyers TP, Baldocchi DD (1991) The budgets of turbulent kinetic-energy and Reynolds stress within and above a deciduous forest. Agric For Meteorol 53: 207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moeng CH (1984) A large-eddy simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 41: 2052–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moin P, Reynolds WC, Ferziger JH (1978) Large-eddy simulation of incompressible turbulent channel flow. Dept. Mech. Eng. Stanford Universiy, Rep. TF-12Google Scholar
  50. Morse AP, Gardiner BA, Marshall BJ (2002) Mechanisms controlling turbulence development across a forest edge. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 103: 227–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nakagawa H, Nezu I (1987) Experimental investigation on turbulent structure of a backward facing step flow in an open channel. J Hydraul Res 25: 67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nathan R, Katul GG, Horn HS, Thomas SM, Oren R, Avissar R, Pacala SW, Levin SA (2002) Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind. Nature 418: 409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nezu I (2005) Open-channel flow turbulence and its research prospect in the 21st century. J Hydraul Eng 131: 229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Orlandi P (2000) Fluid flow phenomena. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, 356 ppGoogle Scholar
  55. Orszag SA, Pao YH (1974) Numerical computation of turbulent shear flows. Adv Geophys 18A: 224–236Google Scholar
  56. Panton R (1984) Incompressible flows. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 779 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. Patton EG, Shaw RH, Judd MJ, Raupach MR (1998) Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 87: 275–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patton EG, Davis KJ, Barth MC, Sullivan PP (2001) Decaying scalars emitted by a forest canopy: a numerical study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 100: 91–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Poggi D, Porporato A, Ridolfi L, Albertson JD, Katul GG (2004) The effect of vegetation density on canopy sublayer turbulence. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111: 565–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Porte-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange MB (2000) A scale dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 415: 261–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Piirto M, Saarenrinne P, Eloranta H, Karvinen R (2003) Measuring turbulence energy with PIV in a backward-facing step flow. Exp Fluids 35: 219–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rao KS, Wyngaard JC, Cote OR (1974) The structure of the two- dimensional internal boundary layer over sudden change of surface roughness. J Atmos Sci 31: 738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raupach MR, Bradley EF, Ghadiri H (1987) Wind tunnel investigation into the aerodynamic effect of forest clearing of the nesting of Abbott’s Booby on Christmas Island. Progress Report, CSIRO Division of Environmental Mechanics, GPO Box 821, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  64. Raynor GS (1971) Wind and temperature structure in a coniferous forest and a contiguous field. Forest Sci 17: 351–363Google Scholar
  65. Sagaut P (2002) Large-eddy simulation for incompressible flows. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 426 ppGoogle Scholar
  66. Scarano F, Benocci C, Riethmuller ML (1999) Pattern recognition analysis of the turbulent flow past a backward facing step. Phys Fluids 11: 3808–3818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Scotti A, Meneveau C, Lilly DK (1993) Generalized smagorinsky model for anisotropic grids. Phys Fluids 5(7): 2306–2308Google Scholar
  68. Schram C, Rambaud P, Riethmuller ML (2004) Wavelet based eddy structure deduction from a backward facing step flow investigated using particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids 36: 233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schmidt RH, Schumann U (1989) Coherent structure of the convective boundary-layer derived from large-eddy simulations. J Fluid Mech 200: 511–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Shaw RH, Patton EG (2003) Canopy element influences on resolved- and subgrid scale energy within a large-eddy simulation. Agric For Meteorol 115: 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shaw RH, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61: 47–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shen SH, Leclerc MY (1997) Modelling the turbulence structure in the canopy layer. Agric For Meteorol 87: 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sheu TWH, Rani HP (2006) Exploration of vortex dynamics for transitional flows in a three-dimensional backward-facing step channel. J Fluid Mech 550: 61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Simpson R (1989) Turbulent boundary layer separation. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 21: 205–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Spazzini PG, Iuso G, Onorato M, Zurlo N, Cicca GMD (2001) Unsteady behaviour of backfacing step flow. Exp Fluids 30: 551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Su HB, Shaw RH, Paw U KT, Moeng CH, Sullivan PP (1998) Turbulent statistics of neutrally stratified flow within and above a sparse forest from large-eddy simulation and field observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88: 363–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Su HB, Shaw RH, Paw U KT (2000) Two-point correlation analysis of neutrally stratified flow within and above a forest from large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 94: 423–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I: the basic experiment. Mon Wea Rev 91(3): 99–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sullivan PP, McWilliams JC, Moeng CH (1996) A grid nesting algorithm for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 80: 167–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watanabe T (2004) Large-eddy simulation of coherent turbulence structures associated with scalar ramps over plant canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 112: 307–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wilson JD, Ward DP, Thurtell DW, Kidd GE (1982) Statistics of atmospheric turbulence within and above a corn canopy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 24: 495–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wilson JD, Flesch TK (1999) Wind and remnant tree sway in forest cutblocks. III. A windflow model to diagnose spatial variation. Agric For Meteorol 93: 259–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Xie Z, Voke PR, Hayden P, Robins GA (2004) Large-eddy simulations of turbulent flow over rough surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111: 417–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yang B, Raupach MR, Shaw RH, Paw KT, Morse A (2006a) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: flow statistics. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 120: 377–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yang B, Morse A, Shaw RH, Paw U KT (2006b) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: momentum and turbulent kinetic energy budget. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121: 433–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Nicholas school of the EnvironmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations