Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 123, Issue 3, pp 395–415 | Cite as

Modelling sensible and latent heat fluxes over sea during unstable, very close to neutral conditions

  • Anna Rutgersson
  • Björn Carlsson
  • Ann-Sofi Smedman
Original Paper

Abstract

During slightly unstable but still very close to neutral conditions new results from two previous investigations have shown a significant increase of sensible and latent heat fluxes over the sea. The vertical heat transport during these conditions is dominated by detached eddies originating at the top of the boundary layer, bringing relatively cold and dry air to the surface. This effect can be described in numerical models by either enhanced heat transfer coefficients for sensible and latent heat (Stanton and Dalton numbers respectively) or with an additional roughness length, added to the original roughness lengths for heat and humidity. Such new expressions are developed using turbulence measurements from the Baltic Sea valid for wind speeds up to 14 m s−1. The effect of including the increased heat fluxes is investigated using two different numerical models: a regional three-dimensional climate model covering northern Europe, and a process-oriented ocean model for the Baltic Sea. During periods of several days, the latent heat flux can be increased by as much as 100 W m−2. The increase in sensible heat flux is significantly smaller since the process is only of importance in the very near-neutral regime where the sensible heat flux is very small. The long-term average effect over the Baltic Sea is of the order of several W m−2.

Keywords

Air–sea exchange Heat fluxes Near-neutral stratification UVCN regime 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brutsaert W (1975) A theory for evaporation (or heat transfer) from rough and smooth surfaces at ground level. Water Resour Res 11:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DeCosmo J, Katsaros KB, Smith SD, Anderson RJ, Oost WA, Bumke K, Chadwick H (1996) Air–sea exchange of water vapor and sensible heat: the HEXOS results. J Geophys Res 101:12001–12016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Rogers DP, Edson JB, Young GS (1996) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes for tropical ocean–global atmosphere coupled-ocean atmosphere response experiment. J Geophys Res 101:3747–3764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fairall CW, Bradley EF, Hare JE, Grachev AA, Edson JB (2003) Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes: updates and verification for the COARE Algorithm. J Climate 16:571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 316 ppGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson JK, Kållberg P, Uppala S, Nomura A, Hernandez A, Serrano E (1997) ERA description. ECMWF Re-analysis Final Report Series 1, 71 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo-Larsén X, Smedman AS, Högström U (2004) Air–sea exchange of sensible heat over the Baltic Sea. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:519–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Högström U (1996) Review of some basic characteristics of the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 78:215–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Högström U, Smedman AS (2004) Accuracy of sonic anemometers: laminar wind-tunnel calibrations compared to atmospheric in situ calibrations against a reference instrument. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111:33–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones CG, Willén U, Ullerstig A, Hansson U (2004) The Rossby centre regional atmospheric climate model Part I: model climatology and performance for the present climate over Europe. Ambio 33:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Källén E (1996) HIRLAM Documentation Manual 2.5. Hirlam Technical Report, SMHI, SE-601 76 Norrköping, Sweden, 233 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Launiainen J (1995) Derivation of the relationship between the Obukhov stability parameter and the bulk Richardson number for flux profiles. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 76:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Large WG, Pond S (1982) Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean. J Phys Oceanogn 12:464–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu WT, Katsaros KB, Businger JA (1979) Bulk parameterization of air-sea exchange of heat and water vapour including the molecular constraints at the interface. J Atmos Sci 36:1722–1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Omstedt A, Nyberg L (1998) Response of Baltic Sea ice to seasonal, interannual forcing and climate change. Tellus 5:644–662Google Scholar
  16. Omstedt A, Axell LB (1998) Modelling the seasonal, interannual and long-term variations of salinity and temperature in the Baltic proper. Tellus 5:637–652Google Scholar
  17. Omstedt A, Axell LB (2003) Modeling the variations of salinity and temperature in the large Gulfs of the Baltic Sea. Cont Shelf Res 23:265–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Omstedt A, Chen Y, Wesslander K (2005) A comparison between the ERA40 and the SMHI gridded meteorological databases as applied to Baltic Sea modelling. Nordic Hydrol 36:369–380Google Scholar
  19. Oost WA, Jacobs CMJ, van Oort C (2000) Stability effects on heat and moisture fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 95:271–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Piexoto JP, Oort AH (1992) Physics of climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Rutgersson A, Smedman AS, Omstedt A (2001a) Measured and simulated latent and sensible heat fluxes at two marine sites in the Baltic Sea. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99:53–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutgersson A, Smedman AS, Högström U (2001b) Use of conventional stability parameters during swell. J Geophys Res 106:27,117–27,134Google Scholar
  23. Rutgersson A, Bumke K, Clemens M, Foltescu V, Michelson D, Omstedt A (2001c) Precipitation estimates over the Baltic Sea: present state of the art. Nordic Hydrol 32:285–314Google Scholar
  24. Sjöblom A, Smedman AS (2002) The turbulent kinetic budget over the sea. J Geophys Res 107:10.1029/2001JC001016Google Scholar
  25. Sjöblom A, Smedman AS (2003) Vertical structure in the marine atmospheric boundary layer and its implication for the inertial dissipation method. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 109:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smedman AS, Högström U, Bergström H, Rutgersson A, Kahma KK, Pettersson H (1999) A case study if air–sea interaction during swell conditions. J Geophys Res 104:25,833–25,851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smedman AS, Högström U, Sahlée E, Johansson C (2006a) Critical re-evaluation of the bulk transfer coefficient for sensible heat over the ocean during unstable and neutral conditions. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc (in press.)Google Scholar
  28. Smedman AS, Högström U, Hunt JCR, Sahlée E (2006b) The forced convection regime of atmospheric surface layer flow, with implications for the exchange of heat and matter at the surface of the ocean. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Woetmann-Nielsen N (1998) Inclusion of free convection and a smooth sea surface in the parameterization of surface fluxes over sea. Hirlam Newslett 32:44–51, SMHI, SE-601 76 Norrköping, SwedenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Rutgersson
    • 1
  • Björn Carlsson
    • 1
  • Ann-Sofi Smedman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth Sciences, MeteorologyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations