Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 119, Issue 1, pp 57–79 | Cite as

Statistics of Scalar Fields in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Based on Large-Eddy Simulations. Part II: Forced Convection

  • Zbigniew Sorbjan
Article

Abstract

Forced convection in a quasi-steady atmospheric boundary layer is investigated based on a large-eddy simulation (LES) model. The performed simulations show that in the upper portion of the mixed layer the dimensionless (in terms of mixed layer scales) vertical gradients of temperature, humidity, and wind velocity depend on the dimensionless height z/z i and the Reech number Rn. The peak values of variances and covariances at the top of the mixed layer, scaled in terms of the interfacial scales, are functions of the interfacial Richardson number Ri. As a result expressions for the entrainment rates, in the case when the interfacial layer has a finite depth, and a condition for the presence of moistening or drying regimes in the mixed layer, are derived. Profiles of dimensionless scalar moments in the mixed layer are proposed to be expressed in terms of two empirical similarity functions F m and F i , dependent on dimensionless height z/z i , and the interfacial Richardson number Ri. The obtained similarity expressions adequately approximate the LES profiles of scalar statistics, and properly represent the impact of stability, shear, and entrainment. They are also consistent with the parameterization proposed for free convection in the first part of this paper.

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer Forced-convection Interfacial layer Entrainment Large-eddy simulations Similarity scales 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deardorff J.W., (1970), ‘Convective Velocity and Temperature Scales for the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer and for Raleigh Convection’. J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 1211–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deardorff J.W., (1974a), ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Height and Mean Structure of a Heated Planetary Boundary’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 81–106Google Scholar
  3. Deardorff J.W., (1974b), ‘Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Turbulence in an Entraining Mixed Layer’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, 199–226Google Scholar
  4. Garratt J.R., (1992), The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press, 316 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Glendening J.W., (1996), ‘Linear Eddy Features Under Strong Shear Conditions’. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 3430–3449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lilly D. K. (1968), ‘Models of Cloud-Topped Mixed Layers Under Strong Inversion’. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 292–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lilly D. K. (2002), ‘Entrainment into Mixed Layers. Part I: Sharp-Edged and Smoothed Tops’. J. Atmos. Sci. 59, 3340–3361Google Scholar
  8. Kim S.-W., Park S.-U., and Moeng C.-H., (2003), ‘Entrainment Processes in the Convective Boundary Layer with Varying Wind Shear’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 108, 221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahrt L., (1991), ‘Boundary-Layer Moisture Regimes’. Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mason P.J., (1992), ‘Large-Eddy Simulation of Dispersion in Convective Boundary Layer with Wind Shear’. Atmos. Environ. 26(9): 151–1571Google Scholar
  11. Moeng C.H., Sullivan P.P., (1994), ‘A Comparison of Shear and Buoyancy Driven Planetary Boundary Layer Flows’. J. Atmos. Sci. 51, 999–1022Google Scholar
  12. Otte M. J., Wyngaard J.C., (2000), ‘Stably Stratified Interfacial-layer Turbulence’. in 14th Symposium on Boundary Layer and Turbulence, American Meteorological Society, Aspen, pp. 74–75.Google Scholar
  13. Sorbjan Z., (1991), ‘Evaluation of Local Similarity Functions in the Convective Boundary Layer’. J. Appl. Meteorol. 30, 1565–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sorbjan Z., (1996), ‘Numerical Study of Penetrative and ‘Solid Lid’ Non-penetrative Convective Boundary Layers’. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sorbjan Z., (1999), ‘Similarity of Scalar Fields in the Convective Boundary Layer’. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 2212–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sorbjan Z., (2001), ‘An Evaluation of Local Similarity at the Top of the Mixed Layer Based on Large-Eddy Simulations’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 101, 183–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sorbjan Z., (2004), ‘Large-Eddy Simulations of the Baroclinic Mixed Layer’. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 112, 57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sorbjan Z., (2005), ‘Statistics of Scalar Fields in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Based on Large-Eddy Simulations. Part I: Free convection’. Accepted to Boundary-Layer Meteorol.Google Scholar
  19. Sullivan P.T., Horst T.W., Lenschow D.H., Moeng C.-H., Weil J.C., (2003), ‘Structure of Subfilter-Scale Fluxes in the Atmospheric Surface Layer with Application to LES Modeling’. J. Fluid. Mech. 482, 101–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wyngaard J.C., Cote O.R., Izumi Y., (1971), ‘Local Free Convection, Similarity and Budgets of Shear Stress and Heat Flux’. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 1171–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations