New Approaches in Two-equation Turbulence Modelling for Atmospheric Applications
- 97 Downloads
The turbulence closure in atmospheric boundary-layer modelling utilizing Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations at mesoscale as well as at local scale is lacking today a common approach. The standard kɛ model, although it has been successful for local scale problems especially in neutral conditions, is deficient for mesoscale flows without modifications. The k–ɛ model is re-examined and a new general approach in developing two-equation turbulence models is proposed with the aim of improving their reliability and consequently their range of applicability. This exercise has led to the replacement of the ɛ-transport equation by the transport equation for the turbulence inverse length scale (wavenumber). The present version of the model is restricted to neutrally stratified flows but applicable to both local scale and mesoscale flows. The model capabilities are demonstrated by application to a series of one-dimensional planetary boundary-layer problems and a two-dimensional flow over a square obstacle. For those applications, the present model gave considerably better results than the standard k–ɛ model.
KeywordsCFD modelling Eddy viscosity Local scale Mesoscale Turbulence closure Turbulent length scale
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bartzis, J. G. 1991a‘ADREA-I: A Three-dimensional Transport Code for Complex Terrain and Other Applications’Nuclear Technol94135148Google Scholar
- Bartzis, J. G.: 1991b, ADREA-HF: A Three-Dimensional Finite Volume Code for Vapor Cloud Dispersion in Complex Terrain, JRC-ISPRA Report, EUR 13580, Italy.Google Scholar
- Castro, I. P. 1979‘Relaxing Wakes Behind Surface-mounted Obstacles in Rough Wall Boundary Layers’J. Fluid Mech93631659Google Scholar
- Coleman, G. N., Ferziger, J. H., Spalart, P. R. 1990‘A Numerical Study of the Turbulent Eckman Layer’J. Fluid Mech213313348Google Scholar
- Garratt, J. R. 1994The Atmospheric Boundary LayerCambridge University PressU.K.316Google Scholar
- Kalnay, E. 2003Atmospheric Modelling, Data Assimilation and PredictabilityCambridge University PressU.K141Google Scholar
- Kolmogorou, A. N. 1942‘The Equations of Turbulent Motion in an Incompressible Fluid’, Izvestiya Academy of SciencesUSSR; Physics65658Google Scholar
- Launder, B. E., Reece, G. J., Rodi, W. 1975‘Progress in the Development of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Closure’J. Fluid Mech68313348Google Scholar
- McBean G. A. (ed): 1979, The Planetary Boundary Layer, World Meteorological Organization, Tech. Note No 165, 201 pp.Google Scholar
- Mellor, G. L., Herring, J. H. 1973‘A Survey of the Mean Turbulent Closure Models’AIAA J11590599Google Scholar
- Venetsanos, A. G., Bartzis, J. G., Andronopoulos, S. 2004‘One Equation Turbulence Modeling for Atmospheric and Engineering Applications’Boundary-Layer Meteorol113321346Google Scholar