Advertisement

BIT Numerical Mathematics

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 927–948 | Cite as

Order conditions for G-symplectic methods

  • John C. Butcher
  • Gulshad Imran
Article

Abstract

General linear methods for the solution of ordinary differential equations are both multivalue and multistage. The order conditions will be stated and analyzed using a B-series approach. However, imposing the G-symplectic structure modifies the nature of the order conditions considerably. For Runge–Kutta methods, rooted trees belonging to the same tree have equivalent order conditions; if the trees are superfluous, they are automatically satisfied and can be ignored. For G-symplectic methods, similar results apply but with a more general interpretation. In the multivalue case, starting conditions are a natural aspect of the meaning of order; unlike the Runge–Kutta case for which “effective order” or “processing” or “conjugacy” has to be seen as having an artificial meaning. It is shown that G-symplectic methods with order 4 can be constructed with relatively few stages, \(s=3\), and with only \(r=2\) inputs to a step.

Keywords

G-symplectic methods Order conditions Conformability Trees Rooted trees 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65L05 65L06 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Marsden Fund. Furthermore, they thank the referees for their valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Butcher, J.C.: The order of numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. Math. Comp. 27, 793–806 (1973)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butcher, J.C.: General linear methods. Acta Numer. 15, 157–256 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Butcher, J.C.: Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Butcher, J.C.: Dealing with parasitic behaviour in G-symplectic integrators, in recent developments in the numerics of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation laws. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butcher, J.C., Habib, Y., Hill, A.T., Norton, T.J.T.: The control of parasitism in G-symplectic methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 52, 2440–2465 (2014)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Frutos, J., Sanz-Serna, J.M.: An easily implementable fourth-order method for the time integration of wave problems. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 160–168 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hairer, E., Lubich, C., Wanner, G.: Geometric numerical integration, 1st edn. Structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations. Springer, Berlin (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Imran, G.: Accurate and efficient methods for differential systems with special structures. PhD. Thesis, University of Auckland, NZGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lopez-Marcos, M., Sanz-Serna, J.M., Skeel, R.D.: Cheap enhancement of symplectic integrators. In: Griffiths, D.F., Watson G.A. (eds.) Numerical Analysis, pp.107–122 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanz-Serna, J.M.: Runge–Kutta schemes for Hamiltonian systems. BIT 28, 877–883 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sanz-Serna, J.M.: Symplectic integrators for Hamiltonian problems. Acta Numer. 1, 243–286 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanz-Serna, J.M., Abia, L.: Order conditions for canonical Runge–Kutta schemes. SIAM J Numer. Anal. 28, 1081–1096 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanz-Serna, J.M., Calvo, M.P.: Numerical Hamiltonian problems, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London (1994)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations