Abstract
In molecular dynamics, Hamiltonian systems of differential equations are numerically integrated using the Störmer–Verlet method. One feature of these simulations is that there is an unphysical drift in the energy of the system over long integration periods. We study this energy drift, by considering a representative system in which it can be easily observed and studied. We show that if the system is started in a random initial configuration, the error in energy of the numerically computed solution is well modeled as a continuous-time stochastic process: geometric Brownian motion. We discuss what in our model is likely to remain the same or to change if our approach is applied to more realistic molecular dynamics simulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
G. Benettin and A. Giorgilli, On the Hamiltonian interpolation of near-to-the-identity symplectic mappings with application to symplectic integration algorithms, J. Stat. Phys., 74 (1993), pp. 1117–1142.
P. Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1999.
G. Ciccotti, D. Frenkel, and I. R. McDonald, eds., Simulation of Liquids and Solids: Molecular Dynamics and Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Mechanics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987.
D. Cottrell, Symplectic integration of simple collisions: A backward error analysis, Master’s thesis, McGill University, 2004. (www.math.mcgill.ca/∼cottrell/thesis.pdf)
E. Faou, E. Hairer, and T.-L. Pham, Energy conservation with non-symplectic methods: examples and counter-examples, BIT, 44 (2004), pp. 699–709.
E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration – Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2002.
E. Hairer, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner, Geometric numerical integration illustrated by the Störmer–Verlet method, Acta Numer., (2003), pp. 339–450.
R. I. McLachlan and M. Perlmutter, Energy drift in reversible time integration, J. Phys. A, Math. Gen., 37 (2004), pp. L593–L598.
C. S. O’Hern, L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Jamming at zero temperature and zero applied stress: the epitome of disorder, Phys. Rev. E, 68 (2003), pp. 1–19.
S. Reich, Backward error analysis for numerical integrators, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 36 (1999), pp. 1549–1570.
E. Shaw, H. Sigurgeirsson, and A. M. Stuart, A Markov model for billiards, preprint, Warwick Mathematics Institute, 2004.
R. D. Skeel and D. J. Hardy, Practical construction of modified Hamiltonians, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 (2001), pp. 1172–1188.
R. D. Skeel and D. J. Hardy, Monitoring energy drift with shadow Hamiltonians, J. Comput. Phys., 206 (2005), pp. 432–452.
L. Verlet, Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard–Jones molecules, Phys. Rev., 159 (1967), pp. 98–103.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
AMS subject classification (2000)
37M15, 37M05, 65G99
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cottrell, D., Tupper, P. Energy drift in molecular dynamics simulations . Bit Numer Math 47, 507–523 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-007-0134-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10543-007-0134-z