Skip to main content
Log in

Mental evolution: a review of Daniel Dennett’s From Bacteria to Bach and Back

  • Review Essay
  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From Bacteria To Bach and Back is an ambitious book that attempts to integrate a theory about the evolution of the human mind with another theory about the evolution of human culture. It is advertised as a defense of memes, but conceptualizes memes more liberally than has been done before. It is also advertised as a defense of the proposal that natural selection operates on culture, but conceptualizes natural selection as a process in which nearly all interesting parameters are free to vary. This liberal conception of key concepts creates space for philosophical innovation, but occasionally makes the empirical content of the theory difficult to pin down. Nevertheless, the book is full of scientific insight, wit, and humor. It will undoubtedly become a cause of both controversy and inspiration for those interested in naturalistic theories of human culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is a doctored version of one of the classical formulations of Morgan’s Cannon. The original uses the phrase “animal activity” rather than “human activity” (Morgan 1903).

  2. See, for example, Piccinini and Scarantino (2011), Floridi (2017), and Godfrey-Smith (2000).

  3. The need to preserve transmission fidelity is precisely why information theory played such a crucial role in the rise of communications technology. Part of the reason for the enormous influence of Shannon and Weaver’s original book is the fact that it contained a proof of the noisy channel coding theorem, which must have been an encouraging insight for the struggling communications engineer. Why? Because it shows that, for any degree of noise you may encounter, a code exists that will transmit your information without loss (Shannon and Weaver 1949).

  4. There is, of course, room for debate about what it takes to play receiver to an informational signal. See, for example, Cao (2012) and Rathkopf (2017). Also, see Shea (2012) for an argument that developmental scaffolding can read genetic information.

  5. A sporocarp is a seed-like structure that is part of the life cycle of fungi and some plants. In this case, it came from a species of fern.

  6. Evolutionary processes can explain the origin of a given variant as well as its distribution within the larger population (Godfrey-Smith 2009). In this pair of examples, I am focusing on the question of origin, but a similar kind of novelty could be applied to distribution explanations.

References

  • Cao R (2012) A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biol Philos 27(1):49–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claidière N, Scott-Phillips TC, Sperber D (2014) How darwinian is cultural evolution? Philos Trans R Soc B 369(1642):20130368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi L (2017) Semantic conceptions of information. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (spring 2017 edition)

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2000) Information, arbitrariness, and selection: Comments on Maynard Smith. Philos Sci 67(2):202–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2016) Philosophy of biology (Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy). Princeton University Press (reprint edition)

  • Henrich J (2015) The secret of our success: how culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P (2009) The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese 169(3):615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewens T (2015) Cultural evolution: conceptual challenges. OUP, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier H, Sperber D (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behav Brain Sci 34(02):57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan RG (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories: new foundations for realism. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan CL (1903) An introduction to comparative psychology. W. Scott limited, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccinini G, Scarantino A (2011) Information processing, computation, and cognition. J Biol Phys 37(1):1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S (1997) How the mind works, 1st edn. W. W. Norton & Co Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathkopf C (2017) Neural information and the problem of objectivity. Biol Philos 32(3):321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2008) Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of information. University of Illinois Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea N (2012) Inherited representations are read in development. Br J Philos Sci 64(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisask M, Värnik A (2012) Media roles in suicide prevention: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D (2000) Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective, vol 10. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann UE (2009) A consumer-based teleosemantics for animal signals. Philos Sci 76(5):864–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1953) The Herring Gull’s world: a study of the social behaviour of birds. Frederick A. Praeger Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Volodymyr K, Rostyslav K, Roman P, Nataliya P, Yaroslav T, Serhiy T (2013) Optimization of car coachwork using genetic algorithms. In: 2013 12th international conference on the experience of designing and application of CAD systems in microelectronics (CADSM). IEEE, pp 410–411

Download references

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Daniel Dennett and Tim Lewens for their insightful commentary on an earlier draft of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. Rathkopf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rathkopf, C.A. Mental evolution: a review of Daniel Dennett’s From Bacteria to Bach and Back . Biol Philos 32, 1355–1368 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9586-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9586-y

Keywords

Navigation