Skip to main content
Log in

Reconciling community ecology with evidence of animal culture: Socially-adapted, localized community dynamics?

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing body of empirical research suggests many animal species are capable of social learning and even have cultural behavioral traditions. Social learning has implications for community ecology; changes in behavior can lead to changes in inter- and intra-specific (between and within species) interactions. The paper explores possible implications of social learning for ecological community dynamics. Four arguments are made: (1) social learning can result in locally-specific ecological relationships; (2) socially-mediated, locally-specific ecological relationships can have localized indirect interspecific population effects; (3) the involvement of multiple co-existing species in socially learned, locally-specific behavior has the potential to create community-wide effects, including varying levels of stability and instability; and (4) social learning can create new intra- and inter-specific selection pressures on local taxa, potentially resulting in rapid evolution. Implications of all four arguments are discussed in relation to community ecology research and modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a useful glossary of terms related to animal social learning, see Shettleworth (2010, p. 467) or Hoppitt and Laland (2013).

  2. Whether non-human animals have “culture” in the same sense as human’s is controversial and debated (Laland and Janik 2006). The term “culture” is used here to convey the presence of behavioral traditions transmitted down and/or across populations.

  3. While there is considerable evidence that killer whales are capable of different types of social learning and that they exhibit cultural traditions, it is difficult to definitively state that differences exhibited amongst killer whale sub-populations are indisputably due to cultural transmission, not ecological factors or genetic divergence amongst killer whale lineages. While some may consider this a problem, I adopt Laland and Janik’s (2006) position that cultural traditions cannot always be clearly isolated from genetic and environmental causes. More specifically, killer whales live for relatively long periods of time, making it difficult to study the extent to which socially learned behaviors are transferred from one generation to the next. Likewise, it is difficult to definitively determine how a behavior that already exists first originated. Also, given that it in incredibly difficult to observe possible instances of this behavior being socially transmitted, it is also difficult to determine whether this behavior is indeed transmitted socially. Given that many of these same limitations exist in relation to knowledge about other top predators’ cultural traditions, that experimental evidence supports the claim that killer whales are social learners (e.g. Abramson et al. 2013), and that a constellation of complementary studies exist for allowing a sustained discussion of the relationship between killer whales’ social learning and the direct and indirect effects of this behavior on sea otter—sea urchin—kelp trophic cascade—a situation that is relatively fortuitous—I have opted to use a killer whales’ cultural tradition as the primary example despite this possible shortcoming.

  4. Danchin and Wagner (2010) describe the possibility of rapid evolution in relation to cultural learning. They use the term inclusive heritability to talk about how cultural traditions and genetic composition both act as mechanisms of information transfer and how these two mechanism can interact and form feedback loops in relation to genetic and cultural evolution.

  5. For an earlier version of this argument, along with supporting empirical studies, see Sol and Lefebvre (2000), Sol et al. (2002), and Marino (2005).

  6. For an additional argument about the effects of social learning on evolutionary outcomes, see Fawcett et al. (2012).

  7. For additional suggestions of how changes in behavior can impact food webs, see Abrams (2010) and Araújo et al. (2011). The suggestions made in these sources discuss the impact of flexible behavior and behavioral pluralism, only some of which are socially learned and none of which are explicitly identified as such. Regardless, many of the suggestions are still applicable given that socially-learned behaviours are one possible reason for behavioral diversity. For suggestions that link social learning and culture to issues related to population biology and wildlife management, see Whitehead (2010).

  8. Given that it is often difficult to identify the presence of socially-learned, locally-specific behaviors, community ecologists may profit by teaming up with behavioral ecologists, comparative psychologists and cognitive ethologists who are already involved in identifying these behaviors.

References

  • Abrams PA (2010) Flexible foragers in food webs: implications of flexible foraging for interspecific interactions: lessons from simple models. Funct Ecol 24:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramson JZ, Hernández-Lloreda V, Call J, Colmenares F (2013) Experimental evidence for action imitation in killer whales. Anim Cogn 16:11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler HE (1955) Some factors of observational learning in cats. J Genet Psychol 86:159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo M, Bolnick DI, Layman CA (2011) The ecological causes of individual specializsation. Ecol Lett 14:948–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird RW (2000) The killer whale: foraging specializations and group hunting. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 127–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista LF, Gaunt SLL (1997) Social interaction and vocal development in birds. In: Snowdon CT, Hausberger M (eds) Social Influences on vocal development. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, pp 23–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher MD, Campbell SE, Nordby JC (1998) The cognitive ecology of song communication and song learning in the song sparrow: evidence of social learning. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology: the evolutionary ecology of information processing and decisions making. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 175–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9:191–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C (1994) Chimpanzees—red colobus monkeys: a predator-prey system. Anim Behav 47:1135–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boran JR, Heimlich SL (1999) Social learning in cetaceans: hunting, hearing and hierarchies. In: Box HO, KR Gibso (eds) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 282–307

  • Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) (1999) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richardson PJ (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Henrich J (2011) The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. PNAS 108:10918–10925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro TM (1994) Cheetahs of the Serengeti Plains: Group Living in an Asocial Species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1993) The trophic cascade in lake ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman M (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JV, Nicol CJ, Jones R, McGreevy PD (1996) Effects of observational learning on food selection in horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 50:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn J (1998) A dog-eat-dog world? Bioscience 48:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The Bottlenose Dolphin: Social Relationships in a Fission-Fusion Society. In: Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) J Mann. Field Studies of Dolphins and Whales. University of Chicago Press, Cetacean Societies, pp 91–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Creanza N, Fogarty L, Feldman MW (2012) Models of cultural niche construction with selection and assortive mating. PLoS ONE 7(8):e42744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1988) Cultural transmission of enemy recognition by birds. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Wagner RH (2010) Inclusive heritability: combining genetic and non-genetic information to study animal behavior and culture. Oikos 119:210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day RL, Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ (2003) Rethinking adaptation: the niche-construction perspective. Perspect Biol Med 46:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Gross LJ (eds) (1992) Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations. Chapman and Hall, Communities and Ecosystems

    Google Scholar 

  • Deecke VB, Barrett-Lennard LG, Spong P, Ford JKB (2010) The structure of sterotypes calls reflects kinship and social affiliation in resident killer whales (Orcinus orca). Naturwissenschaften 97:513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman C, Templeton J, Lefebvre L (1996) Mode of foraging competition is related to tutor preference in Zenaida aurita. J Comp Psychol 110:45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer LA, Letourneau DK (1999) Trophic cascades in a complex terrestrial community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5072–5076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Duggins DO (1995) Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generalizability and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecol Monogr 65:75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Palmisano JF (1974) Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science 185:1058–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Tinker MT, Williams TM, Doak DF (1998) Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science 282:473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahse L, Wissel C, Grimm V (1998) Reconciling classical and individual-based approaches in theoretical population ecology: a protocol for extracting population parameters from individual-based models. Am Nat 152:838–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett TW, Hamblin S, Giraldeau L-A (2012) Exposing the behavioral gambit: the evolution of learning and decision rules. Behav Ecol. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars085

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E (1990) Social processes affecting the appearance of innovative behaviors in capuchin monkeys. Folia Primatol 54:155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LG (1986a) Social organization of the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta). I. Demography. Anim Behav 34:1500–1509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank LG (1986b) Social organization of the spotted hyaena Crocuta crocuta. II. Dominance and reproduction. Anim Behav 34:1510–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeberg TM (1998) The cultural transmission of courtship patterns in cowbirds, Molothrus ater. Anim Behav 56:1063–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz J, Kotrschal K (1999) Social learning in common ravens, Covus corax. Anim Behav 57:785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1997) Individual behavior and community dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG Jr (1996) Social Influences on Food Preferences and Feeding Behaviors of Vertebrates. In: Capaldi ED (ed) Why We Eat What We Eat: The Psychology of Eating. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp 207–231

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG Jr, Allen C (1995) A new model system for studying behavioral traditions in animals. Anim Behav 50:705–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland EC et al (2011) Dynamic horizontal cultural transmission of humpback whales song at the ocean basin scale. Curr Biol 21:687–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JP, Dell AI, Delong JP, Pawar S (2015) Chapter one—scaling-up trait variation from individuals to ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 52:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns and behavior. The Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (1995) Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49:241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant BR, Grant PR (1996) Cultural inheritance in song and its role in the evolution of Darwin’s finches. Evolution 50:2471–2487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Evans CS (2003) Social learning of antipredator behavior in a marsupial. Anim Behav 66:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen T, Slagsvold T (2004) Early learning affects social dominance: interspecifically cross-fostered tits become subdominant. Behav Ecol 15:262–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heindrich B (1999) The mind of the raven. Cliff Street Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, McElreath R (2003) The evolution of cultural evolution. Evol Anthropol 12:123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes C (2012) What social about social learning? J Comp Psychol 126:193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (1996) Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland JL, Brown CR (2016) Prairie dogs increase fitness by killing interspecific competitors. Proc R Soc B 283:20160144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppitt W, Laland KN (2013) Social Learning: An Introduction of Mechanisms; Methods and Models. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson R, Schaal B, Bilko A (1999) Transmission of olfactory information from mother to young in the European rabbit. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 141–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman MA, Wrangham RW (1994) Diversity in medical plant use by chimpanzees in the wild. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ, Avital E (1998) ‘Lamarckian’ mechanisms in darwinian evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 13:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal Rachel L, Deborah M, Kendal Jeremy R, Vale Gillian, Stoinski Tara S, Rakotomalala Nirina Lalina, Rasamin Hantanirina (2010) Evidence for social learning in wild lemurs (Lemur catta). Learn Behav 38:220–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon KW (1969) The sea otter in the eastern Pacific Ocean. N Am Fauna 68:1. doi:10.3996/nafa.68.0001

  • Kitchener AC (1999) Watch with mother: a review of social learning in the Felidae. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler W (1959 [1927]) The mentality of apes. Vintage Books

  • Laland KN, Janik VM (2006) The animal cultures debate. Trends Ecol Evol 21:542–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Williams K (1997) Shoaling generates social learning of foraging information in guppies. Anim Behav 53:1161–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Richerson P, Boyd R (1996) Developing a theory of animal social learning. In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, London, pp 129–154

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Myles S (2010) How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and human science together. Nat Rev Genet 11:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Atton N, Webster MM (2011) From fish to fashion: experimental and theoretical insights into the evolution of culture. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:958–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee P, Moss CJ (1999) The social context for learning and behavioral development among wild African elephants. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian social learning: comparative and ecological perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 102–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L (1986) Cultural diffusion of a novel food-finding behavior in urban pigeons: an experimental field test. Ethology 71:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L (1995) The opening of milk bottles by birds: evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behav Process 34:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Palameta B (1988) Mechanisms, ecology, and population diffusion of socially-learned, food-finding behavior in feral pigeons. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB, Warhelt KI, Schoener TW (1997) Adaptive differentiation following experimental island colonization in Anolis lizards. Nature 387:70–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe SE, Bradshaw JWS (2001) Ontogeny of individuality in the domestic cat in the home environment. Anim Behav 61:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marino L (2005) Big brains do matter in new environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(15):5306–5307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason JR (1988) Direct and observational learning by redwinged blackbirds (Agelaius Phoeniceus): the importance of complex visual stimuli. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 99–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis A, Chivers DP, Smith RJF (1996) Cultural transmission of predator recognition in fishes: intraspecific and interspecific learning. Anim Behav 51:185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur R, Seher V (2008) Socially learned foraging behavior in wild black bears. Ursus americanus Anim Behav 75:1503–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaren BE, Peterson RO (1994) Wolves, moose, and tree rings on Isle Royale. Science 266:1555–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melero Y et al (2012) Evaluating the effect of American mink, an alien invasive species, on the abundance of a native community: is coexistence possible? Biodivers Conserv 21:1795–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihaljevic JR, Joseph MB, Johnson PTJ (2015) Using multispecies occupant models to improve the characterization and understanding of metacommunity structure. Ecology 96:1783–1792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mineka S, Cook M (1988) Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In: Zentall TR, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning: psychological and biological perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 51–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin P (1999) Community ecology. Blackwell Science, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Kondoh M (2014) Stability of competition-antagonism-mutualism hybrid community and the role of community network structure. J Theor Biol 360:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nel JA (1999) Social learning in canids: an ecological perspective. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DA (1997) Social interaction and sensitive phases for song learning: a critical review. In: Snowdon CT, Hausberger M (eds) Social influences on vocal development. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, pp 7–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol CJ, Pope SJ (1994) Social learning in sibling pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 40:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mara M, Teague D, Dechmann KN, Page RA (2014) Frugivoous bats evaluate the quality of social information when choosing novel foods. Behav Ecol 25:1233–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1999) Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 14:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne K, Payne R (1985) Large scale changes over 19 years in songs of humpback whales in Bermuda. Z Tierpsychol 68:89–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RB, Payne LL (1993) Song copying and cultural transmission in indigo buntings. Anim Behav 46:1045–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne K, Tyack P, Payne R (1983) Progressive changes in the songs of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae): A detailed analysis of two seasons in Hawaii. In: Payne R (ed) Communication and Behavior of Whales. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 9–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry S (2015) Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). Philos Trans R Soc B 366:988–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Hilborn A, Duncan C, Durant SM (2015) Chapter two–individual variability: the missing component to our understanding of predator–prey interactions. Adv Ecol Res 52:19–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnegar JK et al (2000) Trophic cascades in benthic marine ecosystems: lessons for fisheries and protected-area management. Environ Conserv 27:179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1992) Top-down and bottom-up forces in food-webs: do plants have primacy? Ecology 73:733–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reader SM, Biro D (2010) Experimental identification of social learning in wild animals. Learn Behav 38(3):265–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick DN et al (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Science 275:1934–1936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122:240–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen J-T, Forsman JT (2007) Interspecific social learning: novel preference can be acquired from a competing species. Curr Biol 17:1248–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen J-T, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Thomson RL (2007) Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88:1622–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth SJ (2010) Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. Second Edition, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (2013) Understanding variation in behavioral responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Anim Behav 85:1077–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Lefebvre L (2000) Behavioral flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos 90:599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sol DS, Timmermans S, Lefebvre L (2002) Behavioral flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim Behav 63:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1992) Are trophic cascades all wet? Differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems? Ecology 73:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terkel J (1996) Cultural transmission of feeding behavior in the black rat (Rattus rattus). In: Heyes CM, Galef BG Jr (eds) Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. Academic Press, New York, pp 17–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1998) Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol Evol 13:329–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton A, Clutton-Brock T (2011) Social learning and the development of individual and group behavior in mammal societies. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:978–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida S, Drossel B, Brose U (2007) The structure of food webs with adaptive behavior. Ecol Modell 206:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Post DJ, Hogeweg P (2009) Cultural inheritance and diversification of diet in variable environments. Anim Behav 78:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner RR (1988) Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature 335:719–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DJ, Galef BG Jr (2000) ‘Culture’ in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Anim Behav 59:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (1998) Cultural selection and genetic diversity in matrilineal whales. Science 282:1708–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (2010) Conserving and managing animals that learn socially and share cultures. Learn Behav 38:329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H, Rendell L, Osborne R, Würsig B (2004) Culture and conservation of non-humans with reference to whales and dolphins: review and new directions. Biol Conserv 120:427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A, Mesoudi A (2008) Establishing an experimental science of culture: animal social diffusion experiments. Philos Trans Biol Sci 363(1509):3477–3488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiten A et al (1999) Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399:682–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson GS, Boughman JW (1999) Social influences on foraging in bats. In: Box HO, Gibson KR (eds) Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 188–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright TF, Eberhard JR, Hobson EA, Avery ML, Russello MA (2010) Behavioral flexibility and species invasions: the adaptive flexibility hypothesis. Ethol Ecol Evol 22:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JP, Ames GM, Mitchell RM (2016) The more things change, the more they stay the same? When is trait variability important for stability of ecosystem function in a changing environment. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Yan C, Krebs CJ, Stenseth NC (2015) Ecological non-monotonicity and its effects om complexity and stability of populations, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Model 312:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Peter J. Morin, Russel L. Barsh, and three anonymous reviewers for their feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chantelle P. Marlor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marlor, C.P. Reconciling community ecology with evidence of animal culture: Socially-adapted, localized community dynamics?. Biol Philos 31, 663–683 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9530-6

Keywords

Navigation