Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 155–174 | Cite as

The formal darwinism project in outline

  • Alan Grafen
Article

Abstract

The formal darwinism project aims to provide a mathematical framework within which important fundamental ideas in large parts of biology can be articulated, including Darwin's central argument in The Origin (that mechanical processes of inheritance and reproduction can give rise to the appearance of design), modern extensions of evolutionary theory including ESS theory and inclusive fitness, and Dawkins' synthesis of them into a single structure. A new kind of argument is required to link equations of motion on the one hand to optimisation programs on the other, and a major point is that the biologist's concept of fitness maximisation is not represented by concepts from dynamical systems such as Lyapunov functions and gradient functions. The progress of the project so far is reviewed, though with only a brief glance at the rather complicated mathematics itself, and the centrality of fitness maximisation ideas to many areas of biology is emphasised.

Keywords

Formal darwinism Fitness maximisation Behavioural ecology Biological design  Population genetics Natural selection 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am very grateful to the editors and to all those colleagues who will write commentaries on this article. I am also grateful to Richard Gratwick and Paul Crewe for robust and relevant discussions over the past year, and to the Research Centre of St John’s College, Oxford, for a grant (to AG and to Prof. Charles Batty) to pursue the project. Paul Crewe, Cécile Fabre, Andy Gardner, Richard Gratwick, Jarrod Hadfield, Tom Kemp, Samir Okasha, Stu West and Greg Wyatt commented very helpfully on an earlier draft.

References

  1. Barrett R, Rogers SM, Schluter D (2008) Natural selection on a major armor gene in threespine stickleback. Science 322:255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Batty CJK, Crewe P, Grafen A, Gratwick R (in press). An individual fitness maximization principle in a class-structured population under uncertainty. J Math BiolGoogle Scholar
  3. Cosmides LM, Tooby J (1981) Cytoplasmic inheritance and intragenomic conflict. J Theor Biol 89:83–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin CR (1859) The Origin of Species. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NB, Krebs JR, West SA (2012) An introduction to behavioural ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. de Groot MH (1970) Optimal statistical decisions. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Dempster E (1955) The maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. Quant Biol 20:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards AWF (1994) The fundamental theorem of natural selection. Biol Rev 69:443–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellner S, Rees R (2006) Integral projection models for species with complex demography. Am Nat 167:410–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engen S, Lande R, Saether B-E (2009) Reproductive value and fluctuating selection in an age-structured population. Genetics 183:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engen S, Lande R, Saether B-E, Dobson FS (1981) Reproductive value and the stochastic demography of age-structured populations. Am Nat 174:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ewens WJ (1989) An interpretation and proof of the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Theor Popul Biol 36:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ewens WJ (2004) Mathematical population genetics I. Theoretical introduction. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher RA (1918) The correlation between relatives on the supposition of mendelian inheritance. Trans R Soc Edinburgh 52:399–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press. See Fisher (1999) for a version in printGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher RA (1999) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press. A Variorum edition of the 1930 and 1958 editions, edited by JH BennettGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd ed. Dover Press, MineolaGoogle Scholar
  18. Frank SA (1995) George Price’s contributions to evolutionary genetics. J Theor Biol 175:373–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank SA (1998) The foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank SA, Slatkin M (1990) Evolution in a variable environment. Am Nat 136:244–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner A, Grafen A (2009) Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J Evol Biol 22:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner A, West SA, Barton NH (2007) The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am Nat 169:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grafen A (1984) Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK, pp. 62–84Google Scholar
  24. Grafen A (1999) Formal Darwinism, the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy, and bet-hedging. Proc R Soc Series B 266:799–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grafen A (2000) Developments of Price’s Equation and natural selection under uncertainty. Proc R Soc Ser B 267:1223–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grafen A (2002) A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimisation program. J Theoret Biol 217:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grafen A (2003) Fisher the evolutionary biologist. J R Stat So Series D (The Statistican) 52:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grafen A (2006a) Optimisation of inclusive fitness. J Theor Biol 238:541–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grafen A (2006b) A theory of Fisher’s reproductive value. J Math Biol 53:15–60 doi: 10.1007/s00285-006-0376-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grafen A (2007a) Detecting kin selection at work using inclusive fitness. Proc R Soc Series B 274:713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grafen A (2007b). The formal Darwinism project: a mid-term report. J Evol Biol 20:1243–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grafen A (2007c) Inclusive fitness on a cyclical network. J Evol Biol 20:2278–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grafen A (2008) The simplest formal argument for fitness optimization. J Genet 87:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Houston AI, McNamara J (1999) Models of Adaptive Behaviour: An Approach Based on State. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Kennedy JS (1992) The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Killingback T, Bieri J, Flatt T (2006) Evolution in group-structured populations can resolve the tragedy of the commons. Proc R Soc Series B 273:1477–1481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirkpatrick M, Johnson T, Barton N (2002) General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics 161:1727–1750Google Scholar
  39. Lande R (2007) Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection. Evolution 61:1835–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lande R (2008) Adaptive topography of fluctuating selection in a Mendelian population. J Evol Biol 21:1096–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lloyd D (1977) Genetic and phenotypic models of natural selection. J Theor Biol 69:543–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Manolio T, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TFC, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461:747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maynard Smith J (1978) Optimization theory in evolution. Ann Rev Ecol System 9:31–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGregor PK, Krebs JR, Perrins CM (1981) Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). Am Nat 118:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meszéna G, Kisdi E, Dieckmann U, Geritz S, Metz J (2001) Evolutionary optimisation models and matrix games in the unified perspective of adaptive dynamics. Selection 2:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moran PAP (1964) On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies. Ann Hum Genet 27:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ohtsuki H, Hauert C, Lieberman E, Nowak M (2006) A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441:502–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Postma E, Spyrou N, Rollins L, Brooks R (2011) Sex-dependent selection differentially shapes genetic variation on and off the guppy Y chromosome. Evolution 65:2145–2156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Price GR (1970) Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Price GR (1972) Extension of covariance selection mathematics. Ann Hum Genet 35:485–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ridley M (1983) The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Rousset F (2004) Genetic structure and selection in subdivided populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  54. Segestråle U (2000) Defenders of the truth. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Taylor PD (1990) Allele-frequency change in a class-structured population. Am Nat 135:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Taylor PD (1996) Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. J Math Biol 34:654–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor PD, Frank SA (1996) How to make a kin selection model. J Theoret Biol 180:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410–433. This journal was renamed Ethology in 1986. The paper has been reprinted as Tinbergen (1985)Google Scholar
  59. Tinbergen N (1985) On aims and methods of ethology. Animal Biology 55, 297–321. This journal was renamed Ethology in 1986. The paper is a facsimile of Tinbergen (1963)Google Scholar
  60. van Doorn G (2009) Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1168:52–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. West S, Griffin A, Gardner A, Diggle S (2006) Social evolution theory for microbes. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. West SA (2009) Sex allocation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright S (1969–1978) Evolution and the genetics of populations (Four Volumes). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St John’s CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations