Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 153–159 | Cite as

Philosophy and the microbe: a balancing act

  • Maureen A. O’Malley
Article

The cover of Biology and Philosophy features a trilobite, a fruit fly and an orchid; in other words, two animals and a plant. Until fairly recently, much of the content of the journal reflected this cover. As deep and interesting—in fact, as field-defining—as the many papers in Biology and Philosophy have been since the journal’s inception, they were predominantly about the biology of animals with the occasional plant thrown in for good measure. Other journals that published philosophy of biology stayed within those same organismal boundaries, as did books that were about the field as a whole. Eukaryotes other than plants and animals, such as fungi and protists, did occasionally gain a mention (e.g., David Hull discussed slime moulds in his classic 1976 paper on species as individuals), as did prokaryotes (e.g., Sterelny and Griffiths mentioned Bacteria and Archaea several times in 1999). But overall, these examples can be noted primarily for being exceptions and for the remarkably...

Keywords

Evolutionary Transition Scientific Practice Biological Entity Explanatory Strategy Multicellular Eukaryote 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I can’t thank enough Editor-in-Chief of Biology and Philosophy, Kim Sterelny, for suggesting this special issue, and the numerous referees (scientists and philosophers, working in tandem for every paper) who gave detailed and constructive reports on all these papers often within very tight time-lines. The production team and editorial office at Springer has been super-helpful and efficient—special thanks to Malgosia Slowinska and Bhavani Sridhar. Finally, I owe a debt of gratitude to all the authors who made such wonderful contributions despite so many other claims on their time, and who even managed to give considerable feedback on this introduction.

References

  1. Bapteste E, Dupré J (2013) Towards a processual microbial ontology. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9350-2
  2. Cleland CE (2007) Epistemological issues in the study of microbial life: alternative terran biospheres? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:847–861Google Scholar
  3. Cleland CE (2013) Pluralism or unity in biology: could microbes hold the secret to life? Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-013-9361-7
  4. Cryan JF, Dinan TG (2012) Mind-altering gut microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doolittle WF (2013) Microbial neopleomorphism. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9358-7
  6. Dupré J (2011) Emerging science and new conceptions of disease; or, beyond the monogenomic differentiated cell lineage. Eur J Philos Sci 1:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dupré J, O’Malley MA (2007) Metagenomics and biological ontology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:834–846Google Scholar
  8. Ereshefsky M, Pedroso M (2013) Biological individuality: the case of biofilms. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9340-4
  9. Franklin[-Hall] LR (2007) Bacteria, sex, and systematics. Philos Sci 74:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert SF, Bolker J (2002) Ecological developmental biology: preface to the symposium. Evol Dev 5:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals? Syst Biol 25:174–191Google Scholar
  12. Love AC, Travisano M (2013) Microbes modeling ontogeny. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-013-9363-5
  13. Lyon P (2007) From quorum to cooperation: lessons from bacterial sociality for evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:820–833Google Scholar
  14. Malaterre C (2013) Microbial diversity and the ‘lower-limit’ problem of biodiversity. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9356-9
  15. McDonald D, Vasquez-Baeza Y, Walters WA, Caporaso JG, Knight R (2013) From molecules to dynamic biological communities. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-013-9364-4
  16. Müller-Wille S (2007) Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: from nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:796–806Google Scholar
  17. O’Malley MA, Dupré J (2007) Size doesn’t matter: towards a more inclusive philosophy of biology. Biol Philos 22:155–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Malley MA, Simpson AGB, Roger AJ (2013) The other eukaryotes in light of evolutionary protistology. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9354-y
  19. Parke EC (2013) What could arsenic bacteria teach us about life? Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9338-y
  20. Pradeu T (2012) The limits of the self. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Rohwer F, Barott K (2013) Viral information. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9344-0
  22. Sapp J (2007) The structure of microbial evolutionary theory. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:780–795Google Scholar
  23. Shapiro JA (2007) Bacteria are small but not stupid: cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 38:807–819Google Scholar
  24. Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Velasco JD (2010) Species, genes, and the tree of life. Br J Philos Sci 61:599–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zarraonaindia I, Smith DP, Gilbert JA (2013) Beyond the genome: community-level analysis of the microbial world. Biol Philos. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9357-8

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations