Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 813–835 | Cite as

Righteous modeling: the competence of classical population genetics

  • Peter Gildenhuys
Original Research

Abstract

In a recent article, “Wayward Modeling: Population Genetics and Natural Selection,” Bruce Glymour claims that population genetics is burdened by serious predictive and explanatory inadequacies and that the theory itself is to blame. Because Glymour overlooks a variety of formal modeling techniques in population genetics, his arguments do not quite undermine a major scientific theory. However, his arguments are extremely valuable as they provide definitive proof that those who would deploy classical population genetics over natural systems must do so with careful attention to interactions between individual population members and environmental causes. Glymour’s arguments have deep implications for causation in classical population genetics.

Keywords

Natural selection Population genetics Fitness Causation Evolutionary theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to an anonymous referee for many helpful comments that greatly improved the quality of the paper. Thanks also to Gillian Barker for one single extremely helpful suggestion.

References

  1. Abrams M (2007) How do natural selection and random drift interact? Philos Sci 74:666–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brandon R (1990) Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandon R, Ramsey G (2007) What’s wrong with the emergentist statistical interpretation of natural selection and random drift. In: Hull D, Ruse M (eds) Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 66–84Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen FB (1975) Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population. Am Nat 109:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cresswell JE, Sayre CF (1991) Can evolutionary stable strategies exist? Oikos 60:382–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gildenhuys P (2009) An explication of the causal dimension of drift. Br J Philos Sci 60:521–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glymour B (2006) Wayward modeling: population genetics and natural selection. Philos Sci 73:369–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glymour B (2008) Stable models and causal explanation in evolutionary biology. Philos Sci 75:571–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grant P (1986) Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s finches. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant B, Grant P (1989) Evolutionary dynamics of a natural population. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  11. Grant P, Grant B (1997) Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7768–7775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haug MC (2007) Of mice and metaphysics: natural selection and realized population-level properties. Philos Sci 74:431–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedrick P (1990) Genotypic-specific habitat selection: a new model and its application. Heredity 65:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hori M (1993) Frequency-dependent natural selection in the handedness of scale-eating cichlid fish. Science 260:216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laland KN, Odling-Smee J, Feldman MW (2001) Cultural niche construction and human evolution. J Evol Biol 14:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Levene HL (1953) Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am Nat 87:331–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Matthen M (2009) Drift and “statistically abstractive explanation”. Philos Sci 76:464–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matthen M, Ariew A (2002) Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. J Philos XCIX:55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Millstein RL (2006) Natural selection as a population-level causal process. Br J Philos Sci 57:627–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Perspective: evolution of flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: Wright revisited. Evolution 55:1269–1282Google Scholar
  21. Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2007) Spatial differentiation for flower color in the desert annual Linanthus parryae: was Wright right? Evolution 61:2528–2543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephens C (2004) Selection, drift, and the “forces” of evolution. Philos Sci 71:550–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turelli M, Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Stable two-allele polymorphisms maintained by fluctuating fitnesses and seed banks: protecting the blues in Linanthus parryae. Evolution 55:1283–1298Google Scholar
  25. Walsh DM, Lewens T, Ariew A (2002) The trials of life: natural selection and random drift. Philos Sci 69:452–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lafayette CollegeEastonUSA

Personalised recommendations